Reply With Quote
Phil is probably happy that he at least played at a Will Perdue level.Bynum was freaking awesome in the playoffs, btw. You guys couldn't have done it without him.
LOL of all people, it's you typing this? Mr. "75 win ecstasy" and "I joined before the Gasol trade"?
Phil is probably happy that he at least played at a Will Perdue level.Bynum was freaking awesome in the playoffs, btw. You guys couldn't have done it without him.
And Derrick Rose is not a clutch leader.
And "Anthony Randolph will never improve"
Randolph is one of those "he is what he is" kind of players at this stage in his career. He had 82 whole games to demonstrate growth and he couldn't do it.
Good to see you mono. I'm actually calling "83 win ecstasy" this year. Let's not forget my other gems from last year
Allanon, I agree Bynum might be the best center in the west right now.
And Bynum being overrated has nothing to do with his salary, he's overrated because he's deemed the next great Laker center when he's only had small glimpses to give people that idea.
I personally like Bynum. From what I've heard he's a hard worker, and if I were him I'd chill at the playboy mansion. I just think he's a tad overrated and he's immature, but he'll grow out of that.
Randolph was role player and still is a role player, let me know when he becomes a star player mono.
I'm serious on the props here. You've learned to take a joke.
Baby steps.
Do you think he's reached his ceiling as a player?
A very reasonable post in the middle ground.
He's over-rated when compared to other great Laker Centers.
I think he's a role player and will stay a role player. I clarified that in the original thread. I don't think he's becoming a star player.
Look at his pre all star break and post ASB numbers and tell me he didn't improve.
Okay. Glad we settled that.
lol are you gonna hide behind that next year when Randolph is averaging close to a double-double? technically, Pau Gasol is a "role player". So what is your statistical ceiling for Anthony Randolph since according to you he's already peaked?
Randolph may never develop into what he could be bc of the dysfunctional situation in Golden State, but he's an All Star talent.
He's improved alright, but he's still a role player. I know lots of you think he's a star player, but I don't think he has what it takes to become a star.
In all seriousness, you do usually have good posts
I'm serious on the props here. You've learned to take a joke.
Baby steps.
I want to know Allanon's definition of role player. He could easily hide behind "role player" since technically, outside of about 10 players in the league, everyone else is a "role player".
He was a rookie last year. Nobody here says he deserved to make an All Star team or make one of the All-NBA teams. And he may or may not put it all together, but his talent is undeniable.
Agreed. Big men can never fully develop under Mike D or Fatass Nelson.
Anthony Randolph is a role player.
Anthony Randolph's ceiling is a 15 and 10 guy average. He won't be the next Brandon Roy, Rudy Gay, Keven Durant, etc.
But hey, if I'm wrong I'm wrong. I like his game and wouldn't mind if he proves me wrong.
Nelson is a fine coach when he wants to be. He's developed Biedrins just fine. For whatever reason he had a problem with AR last year.
A double-double is not a role player.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions