More detainees released

[LnGrrrR]

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwa...ion/index.html

This week, two more Guantanamo detainees -- Khaled Al-Mutairi from Kuwait and Mohamed Jawad of Afghanistan -- were ordered released by federal judges on the ground that there was insufficient evidence to justify their detention. The Washington Independent's Daphne Eviatar notes this amazing fact: "In 28 of 33 Gitmo detainee cases heard so far, federal judges have found insufficient evidence to support keeping them in prison." Virtually all of those detainees were held for many years without charges and with no opportunity for judicial review. Once they finally got into a court, federal judges (including Bush-43 appointed judges) in the vast majority of cases concluded there was virtually no credible evidence ever to justify their detention. Just consider what that fact, standing alone, means about what our Government has been doing.

I'm so glad we're imprisoning the worst of the worst. Remember, even if we have no evidence to prosecute these men, it's morally acceptable to hold them until we see fit to let them go. Because that's how America's justice system works!

[Winehole23]

The wounded dignity of a nation after 9/11 authorized the vindictive brazenness of a multi-tiered system of justice that Obama now seeks to normalize. The shame of our own shamelessness lies on us like a satanic curse, and underscores the resounding success of terrorist tactics. Not that the terrorists defeated us, but that the American people have willingly and cravenly discarded their own liberty, irreversibly strengthening the hand of our own government against us in pursuit of an illusory security.

[Winehole23]

Fortunately for ourselves and our posterity, our judges seem to have temporarily rediscovered their spines.

[LnGrrrR]

I'm surprised no board conservatives have commented on this.

[DarrinS]

Whew! What a relief. Now I can sleep at night.

[fyatuk]

The wounded dignity of a nation after 9/11 authorized the vindictive brazenness of a multi-tiered system of justice that Obama now seeks to normalize.

That's BS. Obama is just trying to do enough to put on a show. He's still planning on keeping a bunch of people locked up without trial or tribunal on flimsy (if any) evidence.

It's a disgrace to American ideals, but don't think that Obama is really working to correct it.

[Winehole23]

That's BS. Obama is just trying to do enough to put on a show. He's still planning on keeping a bunch of people locked up without trial or tribunal on flimsy (if any) evidence.

It's a disgrace to American ideals, but don't think that Obama is really working to correct it.

We agree. Maybe the word normalize threw you off. It means to make the norm, i.e., to continue or make the custom.

[Winehole23]

Whew! What a relief. Now I can sleep at night.

God you're so trite. It's a miracle your head doesn't float away like a balloon.

[fyatuk]

We agree. Maybe the word normalize threw you off. It means to make the norm, i.e., to continue or make the custom.

I viewed the the use of "normalize" to mean to move towards the norm, but you used it to express the norm changing to match it. Usually, "normalize" is used to expressed movement by the subject towards what is considered the norm.

I'm especially annoyed about the prospects under Obama's plans to indefinitely incarcerate people found not guilty (if another country is unwilling to accept them).

[Viva Las Espuelas]

eh. who care's about this. if our government don't care about where or what happens to these people then why should i? i just hope they believe they are doing the right thing. that's all i can say.

[Winehole23]

eh. who care's about this. if our government don't care about where or what happens to these people then why should i? i just hope they believe they are doing the right thing. that's all i can say.

Uncompromisingly low standards. Could the bar possibly be set any lower?

[Viva Las Espuelas]

Uncompromisingly low standards. Could the bar possibly be set any lower?

i'm watching the bar. the government is setting it. i'm not seeing how my standards are being compromised. did i somehow miss the voting day for this?

[hater]

good for them

[Winehole23]

i'm watching the bar. the government is setting it. i'm not seeing how my standards are being compromised. did i somehow miss the voting day for this?

Not at all. I don't think I suggested your standards, low as they are, were being violated. Carry on.

[Viva Las Espuelas]

Not at all. I don't think I suggested your standards, low as they are, were being violated. Carry on.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A

[Spurminator]

The wounded dignity of a nation after 9/11 authorized the vindictive brazenness of a multi-tiered system of justice that Obama now seeks to normalize. The shame of our own shamelessness lies on us like a satanic curse, and underscores the resounding success of terrorist tactics. Not that the terrorists defeated us, but that the American people have willingly and cravenly discarded their own liberty, irreversibly strengthening the hand of our own government against us in pursuit of an illusory security.

Amazing what can be done with a few boxcutters...

[Nbadan]

People do shameful things when their scared...we sanctioned international kidnapping, torture, rape, and yes, even murder so we could all sleep better knowing that our government was doing everthing in its power and more to protect us....

[Nbadan]

...but these guys making these decisions never fought in a war, they've never placed their lives on the line for a cause or flag...we were the good guys, that's what Marines and all the other service personnel who have fought for us stand up for....we don't torture...we save people from being tortured...we took that dignity away from every person who has died so far....

[clambake]

...but these guys making these decisions never fought in a war, they've never placed their lives on the line for a cause or flag...we were the good guys, that's what Marines and all the other service personnel who have fought for us stand up for....we don't torture...we save people from being tortured...we took that dignity away from every person who has died so far....

yep, the shine came off of this pig.

[Clandestino]

yeah, they were just on the battlefield cleaning it up. they were trying to kill our soldiers

[clambake]

everywhere we went became a battlefield. you must of been one of those non-combat soldier tough guys.

[Rogue]

It costs mass money to keep them in prisons, that's the primary reason why those detainees are released in an unprecedented amount but not because we expect them to become moral citizens that can do something good for america. I heard it from JohnJeff show earlier in the morning that a 21-yr-old guy received a 1 year PROBATION for intimidating to take the life of president Obama. I mean a one-yr probation is too slim for a crime aimed at someone's life, even if Obama wasn't the sexing president of United States. The truth is the government need to scrimp on the prisons to save the money for paying the Obamacare bills and the salaries of police.

[hope4dopes]

Wow it sure does pay to have friends in high places doesn't it. Hey does anyone know how much money Eric Holder's firm made representing terrorists.I mean you know.....just ballpark.

[hope4dopes]

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwa...ion/index.html



I'm so glad we're imprisoning the worst of the worst. Remember, even if we have no evidence to prosecute these men, it's morally acceptable to hold them until we see fit to let them go. Because that's how America's justice system works!

our system isn't perfect, we are a work in progress, but I envision a day when we can just toast these assholes right on the battlefield and be done with it.

[Winehole23]

i'm watching the bar. the government is setting it. i'm not seeing how my standards are being compromised. did i somehow miss the voting day for this?

Of the 33 men who have received hearings in ordinary courts, under ordinary judicial standards, judges have found no credible legal basis for detaining 28 of them. They have been detained for up to eight years and interrogated, without any good reason. Setting them free is the right thing to do. Procedural fairness may seem quaint to you, but once others envied and looked up to us for it, and we were justifiably proud of it. No more.

Using torture to get confessions and other evidence for prosecution; using secret hearsay evidence against detainees with no cross examination allowed; binding over prisoners (Maher Arar) to third countries known to torture political prisoners; allowing agents of foreign countries to interrogate prisoners under our control (the Uighurs); using the lot of these in mosaic form to create an impression of guilt; and many other outrageous and morally bankrupt prerogatives -- have dented the credibility of the jailer. The contemptuous scorn our conduct pours upon the decent opinion of humanity, will return to us. Our reputation as good guys may not.

For you that's no big deal that we continue to detain men we know now to be no threat to us, and probably never were, except in our own minds. That we are beginning to allow our own government to, detain us at will and violate our privacy at whim, like Great Britain, only underscores your moral vacuity and your historical tunnel vision, VLE.

Becoming like Great Britain in terms of privacy, civil liberties and government secrecy is a bad idea.

The whole idea of multi-tiered justice is un-American. If they are really terrorists, bring evidence in court and convict them. American anti-terror laws grant wide amplitude for support of terrorism prosecutions and the like. It's been done plenty of times successfully.

Even by GWB. Even he didn't get everything wrong. All this extracurricular, kangaroo court stuff is bush league and an embarrassment. It brought dishonor on us. It still does. If anyone else was doing it we'd call them show trials and tinhorn tyrants.

Obama had a chance to put an end to this insane foolishness, but he has not. He promised to. He gets an F on this one so far.