Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 63
  1. #26
    boring is a quality
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    6,436
    It seems that you are new in this forum, so any threads about trading Manu are not welcome in this forum, Manu is untouchable.

  2. #27
    Veteran spursfan09's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Post Count
    4,315
    Manu is the intangible. He is the x - factor. So no thank you

  3. #28
    The Wemby Assembly z0sa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    15,772
    I would not do it, but from a "talent" standpoint, people need to quit acting like Boozer is some scrub.

    Is he a massive ? Yes. Does he play very poor defense? Yes. But he has talent and has been a ~20/10 guy for a while. Most of the league or GM's would put Manu on the same tier as Boozer value wise when both are healthy. Some may put Boozer much ahead.

    Spurs value Manu for his hustle, heart and intangibles. He is a good guy and easy to root for when he is on your team. But people need to quit flaming the OP like it is some ridiculous idea.
    ... maybe we all took a look at our big man situation and realized we need a 2005 ben wallace, the opposite of a 2009 Carlos Boozer, if we're going to shore the situation up further. Scoring and rebounding down low should not be a problem now, and those are the two primary advtanges Boozer brings to the table. Additionally, if he played passably well on D, there'd be much more motivation to get him. Problem is, he doesn't much and even when he's 'on' defensively, he doesn't block or alter many (read:any) shots.

    Besides the fact moving Manu for yet another big leaves gaping holes in the backcourt.
    Last edited by z0sa; 08-05-2009 at 03:07 PM.

  4. #29
    Believe. 760Spursfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    500
    Healthy Manu-Healthy Boozer..... no

    Injured Manu-Healthy Boozer.... yes

  5. #30
    Ballin' is a habit... TIMMYD!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    6,170
    I just thought of something even if Tim plays at center next year he can still make the all-star team because Yao Ming won't be there.

  6. #31
    GFY I. Hustle's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    13,196
    I doubt Manu would do any good as a GM and RC just doesn't look like a baller to me. Maybe when he was younger but this makes no sense to me.

  7. #32
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    712
    llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

  8. #33
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    7
    No way.

  9. #34
    Double facepalm...
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,842
    injured manu > healthy boozer
    +1

  10. #35
    '99/'03/'05/'07 MmP's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    1,021
    Also Boozer health is just as bad as Ginobili's. I would trade Jefferson for Boozer and Korver, not Manu.
    As bad? Wherer did Manu got the fcking reputation of an Injury prone??
    The guys has had only 1 serious injury in his carreer and he's soft. I don't get it.
    From 25 to 30 he's been as healthy as few in the league, give him a rest.

  11. #36
    Silence surpasses speech. duncan228's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    27,693
    I just thought of something even if Tim plays at center next year he can still make the all-star team because Yao Ming won't be there.
    Duncan has played Center to some degree (or more) for years. He'll stay listed as the Power Forward for all Spurs games and as a Forward on the All-Star ballot.

  12. #37
    The Great Eight Ocotillo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,029
    Boozer is not a Spur.

    He is short on character.

    The Spurs look at more than simply talent, age and potential, they look at the intangibles and Boozer falls short there.

  13. #38
    Spurs are Lottery Bound. SequSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    20,887
    yeah...I would definitely trade Manu for him. It's not even a tough sell or hard to think about... , Tony Parker for Boozer also.

  14. #39
    Don't stop believin' Dex's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    27,659
    The best player in the NBA for a drunk?

    Sounds like somebody here is the boozer.

    Yuckity yuck yuck.

  15. #40
    www.YouTube.com/ClubSpurs DynastySpurs210's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    289
    WTF!!! LOLZ

    uh nah were fine wut we got!! we dont need more pf!!
    were only missing 2 pieces to our puzzle and its Raja Bell/ Marcus Campy

  16. #41
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Boozer is just a post scoring version of Bonner. He doesn't do anything else to make his team better, and is a turnstile on defense.

  17. #42
    In Manu we STILL trust! rayray2k8's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    5,635
    I liked you better when you didn't talk.

  18. #43
    WooooWeeee!!!! Pucho!!!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    270
    Get Boozer for a yr, watch him miss defensive assignments and definitely lose him next summer to a suitor with a larger money bag or keep Manu for a yr, have him go off this season becuz he feels he's got sumthing to prove and prolly have him 2-3 more years after while he shows r new SGs (de Colo for one) the ropes...I'd rather have Manu!

  19. #44
    Veteran Sisk's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    6,709
    yeah...I would definitely trade Manu for him. It's not even a tough sell or hard to think about... , Tony Parker for Boozer also.
    pretty sure this oozes with sarcasm..

  20. #45
    We'll Be Back Spursfan092120's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    20,390
    lol @ the baited thread.

  21. #46
    Veteran spursfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    3,698
    LOL parker for him. LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO

  22. #47
    Veteran spursfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    3,698
    No. Boozer plays no defense once so ever and we are already stacked on big men.

  23. #48
    Chunky Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    30,520
    yeah...I would definitely trade Manu for him. It's not even a tough sell or hard to think about... , Tony Parker for Boozer also.
    have you forgot ? TP is the best player in the nba

  24. #49
    You Belinelli Believe It! dougp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    2,443
    Seriously you , respond in the ing thread.

  25. #50
    Chunky Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    30,520
    I would not do it, but from a "talent" standpoint, people need to quit acting like Boozer is some scrub.

    Is he a massive ? Yes. Does he play very poor defense? Yes. But he has talent and has been a ~20/10 guy for a while. Most of the league or GM's would put Manu on the same tier as Boozer value wise when both are healthy. Some may put Boozer much ahead.

    Spurs value Manu for his hustle, heart and intangibles. He is a good guy and easy to root for when he is on your team. But people need to quit flaming the OP like it is some ridiculous idea.
    ^that

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •