No. Dr House was complaining about Spurs fans, when he is in a Spurs forums. It's not exclusive to the Spurs, but it is about the Spurs.
Without us, this place would be no better than lakerground, dumbass. The owners of this site has made it clear many times that any fan base is welcome. Now go back to the spurs forum and circle jerk each other some more.
No. Dr House was complaining about Spurs fans, when he is in a Spurs forums. It's not exclusive to the Spurs, but it is about the Spurs.
Why do you care? If i was posting at Lakers talk and went to an NBA forum (if they have one) I would ABSOLUTELY expect the majority of posts to be anti Laker. I thought that was the purpose of creating a seperate forum. I guess i don't comprehend so well.![]()
That's not what my original post was about. Go back and read.
stop crying.
I just saw Houdini try to shove a piece of cheap bond paper under Duncan when he jumped and Harry failed.
Who's crying?
No problem
Suns in 2005
Heat in 2005
Pistons in 2006
What's the name of the website?
Give it up folks... he can't grasp it.
I didn't have HDTV back then.
I'm sorry I missed that
I understand this is the NBA section, and I don't care if Laker fan rips on the Spurs. If you complain about the Spurs fans, you have to think of where you are. This is called SpursTalk. Again, if I went to LakerTalk and complained about the conversations of Laker fans it would be dumb. Why? Because it's called LakerTalk, not NBA Talk.
He's being obstinate & facetious. He still ain't over:
A. the Mavs beating his ass.
B. the Lakers beating everyone's ass.
If they were World Champions we'd be welcome here, and have to listen endless to their war stories.
If I ever get to San Antonio I'm gonna go Santa Ana on these wimps.
You really don't get it... but it's ok. Believe what you will...
A. I was over that a long time ago.
B. I don't care if the Lakers won the championship or not, it's not that big of a deal to me.
I never said Laker fan or any other fan is not welcome. All I said is that if you're going to complain about Spurs fan posting, you should realize that you're on a Spurs forum/message board, whatever you want to call it. But you guys can go on with your antics.
Sorry for hijacking the thread. I'm done with what website we're on.
well thank the damn juwan howard who by the way his mavericks almost got swept by the spurs without Derek Anderson there 2nd leading scorer
okay i was over exagerating on that part but anderson would have helped the spurs offense and defense probably winningthe first 2 games but getting our butt wooped over there and wouldnt have know what would happen over there
2002 if stephon jackson who was on the IR was playing we would of defintley beat LA in 2002 guarnteed but probably lose to the kings
Manufan10. If any fanbase doesn't like having loads of spurs fans saturating the conversation, GTFO. Don't complain because your pussy hurts from many more of spurfan having the exact opposite opinion on everything.
Kobe smells blood whenever he play against the spurs..he'd always step up a notch and take it right into their hearts! besides, who could/can stop kobe on that team?![]()
LAKERS is correct here,,,,Kobe does possess some ownage rights when it comes to the Spurs.
And this Manufan10 fellow, he must realize that we're here, we're stayin' here and last but not least,,,we're like World Champions. Perhaps next June that may change, probably not. God willing, and the creek don't rise, we'll be World Champions once again. So, he needs to get an at ude adjustment and learn to coexist with our Lakers Fandom. By & large we're a fair, but, a very firm bunch. We, as a group adhere closely with the Davy Crockett motto of life: "make sure you're right, then go ahead."
A regular season game is irrelevant. That 2001 Laker squad had Shaq who was just unstoppable. Kobe tore us apart as well, but the reason he was killing us was because of the double & triple teams Shaq was drawing. As Shaq declined, Kobe was a lot easier to contain (see the 2003 & 2004 series).
Laker fans just don't appreciate Shaq enough. He was so damn dominant from 2000-2002. Like it or not, Kobe wouldn't be the player he is if it weren't for Shaq.
We don't appreciate him because Daddy where he ate. Media siding him because it sold papers doesn't change that fact.
I think Kobe would have flourished no matter where he ended up playing. His skills transcend Shaq, and I think he proved that when he won a championship without him.
Spur fans just don't like admitting that Kobe is good and that he was one of the main reasons they never repeated in their run. So what they try to do is keep repeating the same tired mantra that Shaq was the only reason the Lakers won and Kobe rode his coattails to 3 rings. And then they repeated the same tired drivel for years that Kobe could never win a ring without Shaq. And he did.
And in the end you all look like fools and your team gets face ed in the 1st round by a pathetic Dallas team.
Now that you mention, Shaq and Kobe were both childish and helped them sell papers. BTW you can't discount Phil, he had to chip in to soothe his ego..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)