Nah, Republicans have just as many.
Tell me Yoni, do you believe Obama was born in the US? That's about as unambiguous as I can make that.
Birthers, Deathers etc
Hurricane Katrina consipracists, 9/11 conspiracists or any other Bush/Cheney conspiracists etc.
That figure makes sense to me, "believe (or believed)" I would be with you if she didn't include past tense.
Nah, Republicans have just as many.
Tell me Yoni, do you believe Obama was born in the US? That's about as unambiguous as I can make that.
Really? Name 'em.
Yes, I do. Equally unambiguous.
Obama is not a citizen.
Obama is a Muslim.
Obama was educated in a madras.
Death panels.
Forced end of life counseling.
Forced abortions.
Forced euthanasia.
Pain pills instead of pacemakers.
Old people should accept their conditions rather than treat them.
Swine flu broke out under Carter.
Saddam was behind the 9/11 attacks.
ACORN's activities resulted in thousands of fraudulent votes.
Just off the top of my head.
Great, ask me an unambiguous question about Bush next time.Yes, I do. Equally unambiguous.
Really? How many of these items get any traction with the Main Stream Media vs. liberal attacks?
They get plenty of traction insofar as they are reported. Then people with a bias against the mainstream media can conclude that the conservative attacks must be true.
Do you believe Obama was born in the US?
Wow, how easily you forget. Yes, he was born in Hawaii.
so you're ok with lying about the bill? I thought you didn't like liars?
No, name leading Republican politicians that support idiotic conspiracy theories. Coulter named just about every leading Democrat currently serving.
Why?
, there was a video where people asked a bunch of Republican congressmen on their way to the Capitol if Obama is a US citizen. Only about one out of ten answered in the affirmative.
I knew you couldn't do it.Why?
Post the video...let's identify them.
Got any more examples?
Why would I?
I'll post it when I get back.
There are plenty of examples of Republicans who would rather let the lie spread unabated if it suits their purposes. , you still think Saddam was behind 9/11.
Exactly what I am talking about. It suits your purpose not to ask me an unambiguous question about Bush and 9/11.Why would I?
Barack Hussein Osama is US citizen.
I want to see a Republican leader on the level of a Pelosi, Reid, McAuliffe, and the others listed in my post.
Once again, you perpetuate a lie.
I don't have any questions to ask you about President Bush or September 11.
I don't remember if they were on the video, but I don't really give much of a about what you want.
Do you believe Saddam was involved in the 9/11 attacks?Once again, you perpetuate a lie.
Yes or no.
You did when it was ambiguous; now you just became a pussy when the actual questioning starts. It's not unexpected.I don't have any questions to ask you about President Bush or September 11.
Well, if you're going to claim Republicans engage in conspiracies at the same level as do Democrats, you should support that claim. It's not about what I want, it's about supporting your lame argument.
But, if you can't, I understand.
I have no idea. He had a demonstrated relationship with terrorist organizations, including al Qaeda. But, asking me if he was involved in 9/11 is different, again, from the statement you made in the previous post that I thought he was behind it. And, that, I don't believe. I believe Osama bin Laden was behind it.
Really? When was that?
, the death panel came straight from the keyboard of Sarah Palin.
Tax-funded abortions came from Boehner.
I have no idea. He had a demonstrated relationship with terrorist organizations, including al Qaeda. But, asking me if he was involved in 9/11 is different, again, from the statement you made in the previous post that I thought he was behind it. And, that, I don't believe. I believe Osama bin Laden was behind it.You still can't bring yourself to admit it.
This thread. Damn, you're stupid.Really? When was that?
I forget the Orwellian name of the committee created by this legislation but, it does, in fact provide financial incentives to doctors to steer patients away from curative and toward palliative care.
She's a mother pissed about the consequences that would be suffered by her child. I'd call it a death panel too.
Will abortions be paid for under this plan?
Admit what?
Must have been rhetorical.
You're both absolutely right, except for the fact it's total bull .
With tax money?Will abortions be paid for under this plan?
They're still translating the do ents!Admit what?
Must've been stupid. I'd try to forget about it to if I were you.Must have been rhetorical.
"Section 1233," writes Charles Lane of the Washington Post editorial board about the health care bill, "addresses compassionate goals in disconcerting proximity to fiscal ones," as he writes about the discussions doctors are to have with patients about end-of-life treatment.
"Though not mandatory, as some on the right have claimed, the consultations envisioned in Section 1233 aren't quite "purely voluntary"," Lane writes.
"What's more, Section 1233 dictates, at some length, the content of the consultation," he adds.
You can read Lane's weekend column at http://bit.ly/n4Zsx
If they're available under Obama's "public option," that would be tax money, no?
Could be. There were millions of them.
Okay...it made such an impression you can't recall it either. Let's move on.
Which reports state that?
Not mandatory.
Thanks for refuting the death panel for me.
No. Clever accounting perhaps, but no.If they're available under Obama's "public option," that would be tax money, no?
Why didn't they just ask Saddam -- you know, the prize pig of the whole invasion and occupation?Could be. There were millions of them.
I recalled it to you, dumbass. It's up there.Okay...it made such an impression you can't recall it either. Let's move on.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)