Reply With Quote
I like Cornell better. I think he has more unique vocals with a greater range.
Discuss.
I like Cornell better. I think he has more unique vocals with a greater range.
Cornell
Definately Cornell
+1
also......bob schneider sucks
I've always been a fan of Scott Weiland. His music and his looks
Have there ever been two bigger disappointments in the music industry? Weiland with his drugs and Cornell with his longing to be the male version of Nelly Furtado.
Cornell has been pretty useless since "Down on the Upside"... he just doesn't have the voice anymore. Weiland is more of a performer than a real vocal talent. They both owe a great deal to the musicians behind them.
I agree Soundgarden needs to get back together. His solo stuff SUUUUUUCKED and Audioslave was crap too.
Maybe they can get Timbaland to produce.
Riiight. Because Weiland is the first and last artist to have addiction issues, thanks ever so much for showing us the light. And tell us again how his addiction makes his music worse? For what it's worth, he's supposidly been sober since 02. It's also funny that you made the Cornell/Furtado analogy because that's exactly who he reminds me of.
You have a real talent there, Mr.Music critic.
Cornell no brainer...
Cornell, not even close.
Cornell is the best rock singer of his generation, period. I'd kill to be able to sing like him. Whiskey sour with range. Amazing talent.
Cornell
Cornell is the greater 'talent.'
I prefer weiland's voice myself, though
Is this even a question. While I have always loved Weiland... he only has an ounce of the talent that Cornell has. No compe ion.
Cornell is the better vocalist. I thought his first solo single "She can't change me" from Euphoria Morning was a pretty damn good song, still on my mp3 player, but its the only song from his first solo album I heard. And I heard a solo song from his album a year or so ago on those music only channels in the 900's on cable and it sounded pretty cool.
But he's still a big piece of egomaniac. It's not like his vocals made Soundgarden anyways....i think alot of it was studio magic on the CD.
For instance:
Listen to "Pretty Noose" from DOTU. He sounds great. Then flashback to SNL, while promoting the album, they performed "Pretty Noose" and Cornell made the entire band sound like Pip farting on a snare drum.
How is this even a discussion? Cornel hands down.
Never go by an SNL performance to judge an act's live potential. SNL has a studio with horrible acoustics. Everyone sounds like on SNL.
Cornell. He had success with both Soundgarden and Audioslave. For the record, Kings of Leon sounded really good on SNL. Weiland had STP and Velvet Revolver. STP was pretty good and successful but Velvet Revolver isn't on the same level with Audioslave.
Weiland, with no doubt. But it all depends on your taste. Still get pumped when I hear,
I am smellin' like the rose
that somebody gave me on
my birthday deathbed
I am smellin' like the rose
that somebody gave me
'cause I'm dead & bloated
who vs. who??
even with the bar set low he sounded like crap
try to find a video of the performance
he wasn't even able to hit the high notes properly
the rest of the song sounded adequate
I guess I don't understand what you're saying here. Are you implying that his addiction made his music career better? And the Furtado analogy goes to their choice in producer in an attempt to get played on top 40, only with Nelly it worked. You would think that with the internet at your disposal, you would've figured that one out.Riiight. Because Weiland is the first and last artist to have addiction issues, thanks ever so much for showing us the light. And tell us again how his addiction makes his music worse? For what it's worth, he's supposidly been sober since 02. It's also funny that you made the Cornell/Furtado analogy because that's exactly who he reminds me of.
You have a real talent there, Mr.Music critic.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
