Reply With Quote
Anal Procedure
Awesomeness
Damn 40 yr old dude having to stick with what works to his demographics
Anal Procedure
Awesomeness
Damn 40 yr old dude having to stick with what works to his demographics
Stewart hit on President Obama's single payer stance hypocrisy as well right???
lol beck
Just goes to show that Fox News may as well be Comedy Central, but at least Stewart is funny.
Actually, yes.
Enjoy.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/we...g-me-to-health
You guys are absolutely sick. What happened was not funny except to someone who likes seeing people in pain. From Hospitals Gone Bad:
He doesn't say what went wrong when he woke up during the surgery, he moved and got cut deep. Then the heavy pain killers they had him on gave him other serious problems.Now, this is where it starts to go awry. Starts to go awry after the surgery. The anesthesiologist told me later, he said, I didn't want want to say anything but this is the worst case I've ever seen. He said, and I've never had anybody wake up on the table before. He said, as soon as I turned you off, as soon as I turned all the juice off because we were done, he said, you woke up and turned around and said, I'm in pain. He said, so I turned everything back on. It took three hours to stabilize me on pain.
How about watching this in context:
geez. where would stewart's career be if there was no beck.
The Spin-Zone at it's best!
lol Beck.
Funny ...Beck is such a hypocrite...
I see you didn't watch the 2nd YouTube video I posted. You're a moronic pundit Propaganda Dan.
What he mentions in the 2nd video is really what most people are concerned about. If going to a doctor TODAY is anything remotely like going to the DMV or your local tax office, WTF do people think it will be like when the govt completely takes it over?
There are problems with health care, but why not address those problems rather than overhauling the entire system?
It's funny because he was such an attention about it:
"Nobody cared about me! I felt like a number! Boo-hoo-hoo. Poor me!"
(and it's even funnier now because you're getting all butt hurt about it, too).
Everyone will feel less like a number when govt completely takes over and adds almost 50 million people to the health care buffet. It will also reduce cost and no one will see a tax increase.
No, the govt. death panels will bring that number way down, so we can get back to the highly personalized care we have now.Everyone will feel less like a number when govt completely takes over and adds almost 50 million people to the health care buffet. It will also reduce cost and no one will see a tax increase.
Why do you believe the govt can run it better?
Well, we all know how government gets partisan.
What if we have a republican health Czar placing the decision makers across American hospitals, and they slant the treatment of who lives in dies by political affiliation? You liberals still on board with that possibility?
What if, like in France, only half the care is paid for by the government. Well the poor now get inadequate treatment?
I guess you were saddened to hear that Palin won that debate and the "death panel" provisions are being struck from the bill.
But, without the savings that rationed care promised -- and, don't kid yourselves, that was the intent of the provision to begin with -- I wonder what the CBO will say about the cost of ObamaCare now.
Where did I say that?
Yes, that would be awesome. Then people would have extra motivation to stay out of the hospitals, which would drive costs down even further. It's a win/win situation.
lol death panel.
It's in quotes for a reason, you moron.
Hey, Slate's Mickey Kaus and the Washington Post's Charles Lane, have argued that the end-of-life provision in the bill is problematic--acknowledging in effect (and, in Kaus's case, in so many words) that Palin had a point.
I posted an op-ed from another proponent of single-payer healthcare that called it Obama's "Euthanasia Mistake," or something like that.
It's been pulled from the bill because it could be misinterpreted or mis-implemented, according to the Republican member of the committee. I wonder what "mis-implemented" means.
When people on the left (consider the first three I quoted), and the committee writing the legislation, pulls a provision being highly criticized because it could be construed as ins uting a government "death panel," (I know, I know, it had some magnificent Orwellian name that I forget), I think Governor Palin can rightly claim to have won this debate.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
