Reply With Quote
Okay, let's try this again: Duncan is only playing 3 more years.5 6 7 maybe 8 les if Fabbs is at the helm in the Dunkan era.
5 6 7 maybe 8 les if Fabbs is at the helm in the Dunkan era.
Okay, let's try this again: Duncan is only playing 3 more years.5 6 7 maybe 8 les if Fabbs is at the helm in the Dunkan era.
fifyOriginally Posted by FromWayDowntown View Post
Assuming the Spurs brought Bowen back for next season, who would you propose sits during crunch time: Parker? Ginobili? Jefferson? Duncan?
If none of those guys, then if the Spurs bring back Bowen to be a meaningful part of this team, are you proposing that the Spurs go small in crunch time?
Assuming the Spurs brought Finley back for next season, who would you propose sits during crunch time: Parker? Ginobili? Jefferson? Duncan?
If none of those guys, then if the Spurs bring back Finley to be a meaningful part of this team, are you proposing that the Spurs go small in crunch time?
crickets.
or rather you having a mouthful of Fins per usual.
Either way silence, and that's good.
Real slowly:
Duncan has been on the Spurs 12 years.
This will be his 13th.
Sorry, how do you figure he'll get 8 les?
total up to date.
Not 4 more, altho we agree that would be sweet!
He says with benefit of 20/20 hindsight
Continues with the false dichotomy that the Spurs chose Finley over Bowen
The delusions reach truly grandiose proportions.5 6 7 maybe 8 les if Fabbs is at the helm in the Dunkan era.
I'm suggesting that when there is someone on the other team that is torching us, (like I'm already predicting there will be) and noone on our team can stop them, then we should have Bruce to call on to go in and calm them down.
Btw, Bruce has closed out games for us for years, I don't see how this is a new concept.
And FWD, don't insult my intelligence, do you honestly believe that I think we could go 6 on 5? Do you think that I think that? I figured you'd bring a better arguement than that. Nice attempt to make people laugh, but that's it.
There's only crickets because I have a life and have things to do other than checking in on here as much as you do. You still have no idea what the your talking about, it's amazing, cuz you never have.
actually, I'm saying that neither Finley nor Bowen would play. And that's my basic point. I think the Spurs are better with Jefferson and I think the carping about Bowen's fate is largely irrelevant because Jefferson will be playing late-game minutes with the Big 3, making either Finley or Bowen mostly a spare part. I would have had no problem with the Spurs trading Finley in the deal for Jefferson, but given the realities of contracts, that wasn't possible. Given that the Spurs absolutely had to improve their wing scoring and athleticism, it was worth what it took to make that deal. You can ignore all of those realities and pretend that the Spurs made a choice between Bowen and Finley in making the Jefferson deal, but I don't see that as having been remotely true.
And I was clamoring for Bowen to play more last season, so don't try to paint me as some Bowen hater.
still crying about bowen being gone? get over it already.
lol Fabbs. I don't know that I have ever seen anyone bring blind Pop hate like he brings it...and with the frequency he brings it.
If our only chances of winning a le rest on a 38 year Bowen then we're in trouble.
I wish he was coming back but it doesn't sound like it's happening. The Spurs are moving forward and Bowen is the first casualty.
Not quite how you put it. Bruce would just be that missing piece to a larger puzzle.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
