But you have to admit, this is a re ed idea. Shop him to see his value. How exactly are you supposed to gauge someones value by doing this?
But you have to admit, this is a re ed idea. Shop him to see his value. How exactly are you supposed to gauge someones value by doing this?
By looking at the average offer. And if someone is stupid enough to offer something like Greg Oden (starting to live up to expectations) + Martell Webster (damn good at shooting) + Jerryd Bayless (this guy is good) + 1st round pick 2010 unprotected, you take it and run.
I said if Oden lives up to expectations. Which is supposed to be Dwight Howard second season-like. And Bayless and lock down a PG if he wanted to.
So.......
"if someone is stupid enough to offer something like Greg Oden (starting to live up to expectations) + Martell Webster (damn good at shooting) + Jerryd Bayless (this guy is good) + 1st round pick 2010 unprotected"
you actually would not "take it and run"
Got it
Too scared to admit Oden may just become a great center of this generation and deleted your previous post. Got it.
I quoted the wrong post and moved the comments to respond to your post. I stand by my remarks. You were the one who said you would "take it and run" and then changed it to "if Oden improves".
Trading Parker for the package you suggested lessens the Spurs chances in 2010 and improves the Blazers.
I would not make the trade today.
Would you?
These are the dumbest threads. Why would they trade a top 3 pg who gives your team the best chance to win it all next season? Just use your brain.
It would only even start to make sense if the Spurs had no chance to win a le any more. As of now, they do. If that changes drastically, then you may consider it if you get a no brainer.
This sentence alone discredits any opinion the guy has. One is a really good PG who's lightening fast. The other is a Top 3 PG, who's lightening fast, and is a Finals MVP.Devin Harris of the Nets was my initial thought, but that wouldn’t make much sense because in all honesty, I’d take Harris over Parker if I were starting a team today
Why would you choose Harris over Parker? There is no rational reason why someone would choose Harris over Parker in any sense.
Yea if you get a deal like that you take it and run. But again, is that realistic? Because there is a good chance we won't get a deal like that and a good chance that you'll create a distraction to the team. The Cons outweight the Pros mang.
"I’d take Harris over Parker if I were starting a team today."
that explains the whole article
haha i didnt see this post before i posted. you are totally right
Let's trade him to make room for Bowen.
The only way I would trade Parker is for someone like Brook Lopez.
What a terrible uninformed atricle! Even Portnoy, or whatever his name was, knows more about the CBA than this guy.
anyway, anyone who wants to make an article about the spurs and the strategy they should use should at least know how to spell the name of one of their best player. G.I.N.O.B.I.L.I and not Ginobli as he wrote the whole article.
I am confused. Brook Lopez is a good center but is racking up stats on a weak team where he is the 3rd option. On the other hand, Oden is in a position where his PER 36 is higher than Lopez's and is number 1 in the league in the Spurs' weakest department, offensive rebounding.
It only makes sense he's a Lakers fan.
I bet we could get Mutumbo and McGrady from Houston!
I think:
explains the whole article!![]()
Hey, don't blame the thread. I saw a hilarious article by some dumbass Lakers fan and felt like sharing.![]()
He's a Texas Tech student and self-proclaimed fan of the Hornets.
http://butthegameison.com/blog/about/
His words, not mine:
Mark also won a Twitter contest when met up with Andre Iguodala and Rudy Gay at a Cheesecake Factory in Las Vegas, after both players summoned their followers to hunt them down.
Mark plans on using this blog as a spring board to launch his journalism career after he graduates from college.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)