Nash's assist number has been the most highlighted and credited till the very present days, so I have to argue that Nash isn't a "pure" shooter. Indeed, Nash has many other works to do on court besides shoot the ball. Literally the "pure" shooter refers to someone who can't do crap other than shooting, in this case, Nash is definitely not even close to this le and easily gets overwhelmed by the names like Jason Kapono, Daquean Cook etc...
When a player has to creat his own shots but not pick the cheap ones from your up-doubled teamates, then he isn't actually a "pure" shooter but an all-round key role for his team. I concede Dirk doesn't shoot as wonderfully as Nash does presently, but it's undeniable that Dirk is better than Nash in terms of all-round skills, which include defensive skills.
Agreed. Before nominating someone for the le of "best athlete", we have to clarify the different meanings of athlete and athleticism. Athlete refers to a group of people working in the area relating to sports, say, a chess pro is an athlete even if he's crappy as .
In comparison, athleticism only a component of what a good athlete requires. Some athletes, like the chess pro mentioned above, can be athletes despite their lack of athleticism. Comparably, athleticism isn't bound to make someone a good athlete if he only has athleticism. Stromile Swift is a typical example for this case.
The amount and variaty of trashy words shouldn't be all measurements when you're estimating the pro in this area, superbly the effects and impacts of trash talking are also essential elements. In addtion, dirty words aren't very necessary ingredients in trash talking, that said, some naive words can very well be wrapped up into classic trash talks.
Meanwhile, the le of "best trash talker" isn't guaranteed for the players grown up in ghettos, like Ron Artest or Baron Davis, or Paul Pierce who usually ambles inside-out in those areas.
Matchable to his superb skills, Kobe Bryant's trash talk are also among the top class in NBA, even if it's not THE best. Even the notorious trash-talker Shaq O'Neal was outcompeted by him in 04 and ultimately got expelled from LA, which concretely depicted the efforts of Kobe's remarkable off-basketball skills. Besides, his trash talking was even developed and upgraded to an unprecedented level after shaq's departure, especially after Kobe achieved the bite at shaq's laid legacy, which made his mouth even more trashy than ever before.
If the size is considered before stats, then I argue Nate Ronbinson is a better rebounder than Chris Paul by any means. While on the opposite other end, Kidd prevails over Chris Paul. I admit Chris Paul is rebounding good for his size, but the 6-foot guy isn't worth this le since he doesn't touch either side of "little" or "best rebounder".
Agreed, additionally Dirk's also superb in other categories among the big guys, probably the only where where Dirk isn't a top is just the clumsiness. Oh yeah, and the taste of females as well.
Battier, Bowen and Kobe are all excellent team defenders, specially Shane Battier who is almost the best help-defender in the league. But none of them is as good in one-on-one defense as Ron Artest is. (I disagree, when Kobe wants to play man-to-man D, I've never seen anybody better. In fact when plays that kind of D it's as fun to watch as his offense, and more fun to watch than anyone else's anything.)
Agreed, closely followed by Shawn Marion.
Tony Longoria is undebatably a wonderful attacker, and more preciously, he usually gets scores in the paint dispite his below-average size. But I doubt he's got such a big heart to fulfill some big shots, like the "Fisher 0.4 second".
Rafer has always been the best dribbler since he became a pro in NBA, and it's almost impossible even for a prime-version Gary Payton to get a steal from Rafer's hands. Rafer's dribbling is the only piece of wood that he's grabbed to stay afloat in NBA sea, I mean, his shooting is even worse than a 's.
Leaving alone the thoughts of athleticism, I honestly can't find any spot shining on Ariza's 6-8 body. Dude was just lucky enough to play with some superstars who draws most of opponent attention, what he was requested was just picking some easy wide-open shots.
Brad Miller would have done a better assisting job if he had also got some nice surroundings like Manu and Longoria in subs ution for the craps of Hinrich, Deng etc...