Nevermind, you're right. Everything's just peachy.
So what evidence do you have that any of this has affected his job performance in the past six months?
Nevermind, you're right. Everything's just peachy.
he'll never quit.
He should get fired for being an embarrassment/distraction but that probably won't happen either.
It's not even worth trying to talk to them. They're still in a state of Obama induced utopia. Everythng is just fine in their minds.
![]()
Well, I hope the rest of us have learned a very valuable lesson.
ELECTIONS HAVE ING CONSEQUENCES, PEOPLE.
I hope we survive this one.
Yoni explained to me that Clinton has nothing to do and then jumped to the scariness of the czars. I then asked:
Yoni then tells me everything's peachy.. can you figure out the correllation between Clinton, the czars and foreign affairs?Are these czars handling foriegn affair matters?
The number one czar on the list was Holbrooke who was hand picked to run affairs in Afghanistan.
He may answer to Clinton on paper but, he's an Obama hire.
Look, I just don't want to waste my time pissing into the wind that is the SpursTalk.com forum, today. Maybe another day.
Seriously, I never heard of a czar working in the USA. What does that mean?
Van Jones will kill us all!
Common sense. Goes along way.
Do you think he should keep his job? Are you asking me questions to learn more about Van? What is your opinion about Van the Man? Do you think he should have been hired in the first place? Do you think a known racist,communist,truther should work in the White House?
You know my opinion. What's yours?
It means you haven't paid attention in the past thirty-five years.
You have yet to produce any evidence that his job performance has been lacking these past six months.
My opinion is if he's done a bad job, he should be fired. You have shown no evidence he has done a bad job.
You're a cat now?
That actually makes some sense.
Suddenly ChumpDumpy thinks 911 twoofers being part of the administration is a good thing?
I'd have to hear exactly what his views were. There were parts of that statement that weren't entirely unreasonable.
I would like Darrin to explain how it has affected his job performance in the past six months.
Without using YouTube.
Van Jones needs to stick around to spite Beck and all the hypocrital, lying, sliming Repug haters and hatchet men.
He has shown he shouldn't have been hired.
Obama has shown he either does not know who he hires or he wants radical communist in his White House.
Get off your pedestal. You have zero clue this guy does a good job. All fingers point that he CAN'T do a good job believing in what he believes in working for the U S of A.
You keep looking for your proof.
No, they don't.
I said if he's done a bad job he should be fired.
It's up to you to prove he has done a bad job.
You simply haven't and now you're whining about it.
Stop whining and how me how he has done a bad job.
Why don't you read his words yourself?
He went and talked to prisoners at San Quenten back in March. If I were the head of "green jobs", I know that's the first place I'd go.
Anyway, the San Quenten News did a story on it. Interesting read.
http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/visitors/docs...ION_2009v3.pdf
You know how some companies do a background check on you before you get hired, especially if you are going to have access to sensitive information or be invovled in an area of public safety? Why do you suppose they do that? I would think that the WH of all places would do EXTENSIVE background checks. I think they did. I think they know everything about Van Jones and wanted him anyway.
He hadn't even started his job then.
Darrin, please explain how he has done a bad job. In your own words.
Darrin, please explain how he has done a bad job. In your own words.
What if, by some act of complete incompetence, a day care center hired a registered sex offender? If I had zero knowledge of how that person was doing on the job, I still wouldn't want them to have that job.
Got it?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)