Reply With Quote
Under the plans I've seen, unless they've changed it...you don't have the option NOT to have "insurance."
basically it's medicare for all citizens as an Option not a requirement, chill the out...
Under the plans I've seen, unless they've changed it...you don't have the option NOT to have "insurance."
no one is forced onto a federal insurance plan and if you pay for your own you'll have it unless who ever you have decides they don't want to offer that plan for you any more and that can happen now
Again...I'll repeat myself.
From what I've seen, unless it's been changed...you WILL be forced to have Health "insurance." There is no option to not have it.
Now, you and others may think people may be "insane," or "insanely wealthy" to not have health "insurance." But, I assure, there have been many, many reasons throughout this country's history, of people not wanting health "insurance"...for as many reasons as there are people.
Govt mandating you have "insurance"...is giving up your Freedom and Liberties.
You may not think this is a big deal...but, I assure you...it's a VERY big deal.
And notice one more thing...this isn't about real healthcare at all...it's about "Insurance."
And if you don't believe or agree with anything else I say, believe this...When the govt gets involved in anything, it's always about money and power.
They're not doing this for your well-being and welfare...they are doing it for the reasons above.
All the socialists keep bringing up medicaid. We don't have the money for medicaid. We still need to fix that before 2030. How can we afford this?
How do we pay for a nationalized healthcare?
Years of reading stories like this...
'Doctors told me it was against the rules to save my premature baby'
That is Jayden Capewell in the picture.
When Jayden Capewell was born, he needed intensive care.
British doctors denied him that care and Jayden Capewell die.
The National Health Service rules require doctors to do that.
It saves money.
And the British health system is all about saving money — not lives.
So what does this have to do with infant mortality rates?
You see, even though he was born alive, the British do not consider his to be a live birth.
His mother’s pregnancy was two days shy of the 22-week minimum to be considered a birth and therefore worthy of treatment.
So the British consider him to be a fetus, not an infant.
That is one way to keep the infant mortality rate down.
The rules aren't dissimilar in some of the other countries on your list.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
