i don't think hindus or people of tribes (whatever the that means) force their religions into the US political landscape.
i think maher is full of himself. i watched this movie a long ass time ago and all i got from it was one hater seeking out the easiest of targets within said "faith" to break down and judge for what they believe in whether it be true or not. why just go after christians? why not hindus, people of tribes, people of... because maher might actually get exposed for the ass that he is.
would maher call maria sabina or timothy leary losers or dumb s who believe in something out of their grasp? no and you know why? because maria sabina and timothy leary both experimented with psychedelics to induce their higher perceptions of life and creation. and we all know the druggy maher is because he practically "preaches" his drug life.
maher!
i don't think hindus or people of tribes (whatever the that means) force their religions into the US political landscape.
Sadly, I don't think we do. Huckabee, for instince, said this.
"[Some of my opponents] do not want to change the Cons ution, but I believe it's a lot easier to change the cons ution than it would be to change the word of the living God, and that's what we need to do is to amend the Cons ution so it's in God's standards rather than try to change God's standards."
You didn't indicate the context in which that was said and, it's probably not something I would have said but, in my opinion, not much different that this...
Or, this:When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God en le them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation...
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
He said it in the context of wanting to change the cons ution to reflect what he thinks god wants, Christian values. For example, he wants marriage consitutionally defined as only between and man and a women.
I meant, where and to whom were his remarks directed? Was it part of a longer speech or a remark/response? That's cool...I'll google it and, if I have anything further to add, I'll post it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)