So it's entirely possible he didn't.
Tell me how common it is, Serpico.No, actually you don't. Ticket fixing is not nearly as common as you and others in here seem to believe.
Why speculate?Why not speculate? The U. S. Attorney refused to tell the judge why he requested the dismissal.
I will speculate that you did it all the time and are covering it up. I have as much proof as you do with Sullivan.Yeah, I didn't participate...and, if it happened with others, it must not have been much because, I wasn't witness to it.
I would welcome an explanation from the U. S. Attorney.
So common I've never personally been aware of a case of ticket fixing.
It's what we do here.
Be my guest. I'm betting no one will be as interested to find out if I fixed tickets as will be interested to find out if Sullivan received a favor from the Obama administration.
Write them.
I speculate you are lying.So common I've never personally been aware of a case of ticket fixing.
Hey, you're the one who questioned it.It's what we do here.
You're right that no one has any real interest in you. All the same, I'll speculate that you are corrupt. You have proven to be a liar, so the evidence is actually stronger than anything on the US Attorney.Be my guest. I'm betting no one will be as interested to find out if I fixed tickets as will be interested to find out if Sullivan received a favor from the Oba.ma administration.
I think others will find an answer before the U. S. Attorney would respond to me.
Speculate away...
Funny how that works, isn't it.
Okay...but, I still suspect no one will be as interested in my alleged corruption as much as they will be over the U. S. Attorney's alleged corruption. But, if that's on what you choose to focus, It won't bother me.
Yes, it is funny how you were the one who questioned the speculation of other people on this board when you say it's what we do here.
I'm pretty sure virtually no one is going to care about this either, except as a pretense for eliminating some stupid drug laws and prosecution policies.Okay...but, I still suspect no one will be as interested in my alleged corruption as much as they will be over the U. S. Attorney's alleged corruption. But, if that's on what you choose to focus, It won't bother me.
You must have missed the thread where I admitted my hypocrisy about that and gave props to Shastafarian for calling me out. My saying, "it's what we do here," was an homage to that thread. Catch up Chump.
And, you're en led to your opinion. I think it'll be a bigger deal than you think it will be.
I know all of it. It's fun to repeat the mocking. It's what we do here.
So you speculate. Not everyone is as slavishly devoted to blogs as you.And, you're en led to your opinion. I think it'll be a bigger deal than you think it will be.
Okay. Have fun with that.
Yep. You don't?
What does that mean?
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Not the same as you, no.Yep. You don't?
That means not everyone is as slavishly devoted to blogs as you.What does that mean?
Hey Chump. Have you ever noticed that other posters quit participating in a thread when you and I get into one of these silly flame wars? Maybe that's your intent, I don't know but, frankly, I don't understand your obsession with forum personalities over the political issues we try to discuss.
That's one of the reasons I put you on ignore in the past. These threads get so tedious with you trying to provoke a response of personal ad hominem attacks.
I'd rather talk about the issues instead of about me -- of which, as you pointed out, not many people -- if anyone at all -- is interested.
What do you say, can we stick to the topic or not?
We are talking about the topic.
Feel free to not respond if my posts trouble you so.
What's there to discuss? Radosh's "allegation'' is just as flimsy as your own. Conjured from the thin air. The judge's own complaint does no more than allege the appearance of impropriety, no actual wrongdoing.
Yet you go on and on about corruption.
No dude, you got it all wrong. It's of grave importance. Right up there with the New Black Panther Party and the AF1 photo op. The patriots of the blogosphere are not done with those yet!
Actually, we're not longer talking about the topic. You're talking about me.
eh, it's an OCD I have. Trust me, I will when it gets too tedious.
No, you're talking about me now. I was talking about the topic and you. Try to keep up.
Then quit whining.eh, it's an OCD I have. Trust me, I will when it gets too tedious.
Right on cue...
Speaking of which:
Obama Administration Stonewalls U.S. Civil Rights Commission on Black Panther Case.
You did know there was a federal inquiry into the matter, right? Maybe not since it's been ignored by the media. Blame my slavish devotion to blogs.“The Justice Department won’t cooperate with an inquiry into why they helped the New Black Panther party avoid the legal consequences of voter intimidation.”
Instapundit speculates:
You know, this case is a puzzlement. Perhaps there was fear that a prosecution would open up evidence of wider misconduct that would be more politically damaging than this scandal? Because that’s the only thing that makes sense here.
Winehole, it was the judge's court. It would seem his opinion on the matter would carry some weight. And, he does more than allege an appearance of impropriety. He's pissed because the U. S. Attorney flatly refused to answer the question of why they requested the dismissal.
Right on cue!
That and a pathological hatred for all things Obama.You did know there was a federal inquiry into the matter, right? Maybe not since it's been ignored by the media. Blame my slavish devotion to blogs.
No one cares.
Still.
I speculate no one cares. I speculate if the Republicans get control of one or both houses of congress they will pretend to care, but no one else will.Instapundit speculates:
What else does he do?
I disagree. You don't care. And, granted, there are a bunch of people who don't care. But, it's far from being a cir stance where no one cares. , a federal prosecutor is investigating the incident. Obviously, someone cares.
Right on cue!
That and a pathological hatred for all things Obama.
No one cares.
They have control of neither and there's a federal investigation. Someone cares. Someone more important than you or me.
Not enough to matter.
I said "if." You are bad at reading.They have control of neither and there's a federal investigation. Someone cares. Someone more important than you or me.
It still won't amount to anything.
And still no one will care.
That's your opinion and you're en led to it. I don't share it.
No, I read it. I was ignoring your statement and pointing out that someone caring (pretending or otherwise) wasn't contingent upon the Republicans regaining power. There's already an investigation...and, being under a Democrat ruled Congress and White House, I very much doubt the interest is a pretense.
Why speculate?
That's already a demonstrably false statement. At least one federal prosecutor cares.
Does some point of the law require the US Att'y to explain?
If not, the judge's demands are beside the point. The decision to prefer or withdraw charges in this case would seem to be discretionary. Perhaps no one is owed an explanation as to why.
What is your great hope here, Yoni? That this gets Obama impeached because his AG failed to prosecute a black man with a stick who didn't prevent anyone from doing anything?
I now expect you to say you won't speculate.
Nope. That his Justice department be required to explain their actions and, if inappropriate, that they be held accountable for them.
And, you'd be wrong.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote