You really don't know what you are talking about.
Did you finally figure out that they weren't real underage Salvadorian pros utes?
You really don't know what you are talking about.
you think your witty?My remarks add to the discussion. Yours do not. writing a sentence about your disdain for the way I word my posts are a personal attack. It is going after me and not my post.
![]()
When I try to be.
No they don't. They're 100% sarcastic.My remarks add to the discussion.More than yours do. I say what I actually think more often than not.Yours do not.
No it's going after your post because you think 100% sarcasm and hyperbole actually add to discussion. They don't.writing a sentence about your disdain for the way I word my posts are a personal attack. It is going after me and not my post.![]()
I'll take that as a, "no I think the fake pimp and pros ute were talking about bringing in real underage Salvadorian pros utes."
I already told you. You don't know what you are talking about. Geez.
So you do realize they were imaginary underage Salvadorian pros utes?
Good news for all us that 83 congressmen/congresswomen do get it. Cut those pigs off. That dumbass never will. Now go use that big brain of yours and work out the brain muscles bag.
That was probably just for a soundbite. Bet they will sneak them back in somehow.
Noway. They are cooked.
Do they get that they were imaginary underage Salvadorian pros utes?
For the uninitiated:
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthre...23#post3683323
You missed the target then.
Not 100%. I do use hyperbole but I still instill factual statements, arguments. You make fun of someone's punctuation, physical attributes of the subject, or question their intelligence.No they don't. They're 100% sarcastic.
[quote]More than yours do.You never say anything constructive. Are the one-liners and quips all you think about?I say what I actually think more often than not.
Say's who? My posts add real responses, hyperbole or not. Yours always lead to someone having to respond to you attacking them or belittling them. Also the child pros ution was real to the ACORN workers.No it's going after your post because you think 100% sarcasm and hyperbole actually add to discussion. They don't.
Please defend that. Explain to me how that's taken out of context or he's being sarcastic.
Michael J. Fox's response.
I'll have to take your word for it.
Pretty close.Not 100%.
You instill statements?I do use hyperbole but I still instill factual statements, arguments.
I only question their intelligence when they think imaginary underage Salvadorian pros utes are real underage Salvadorian pros utes.You make fun of someone's punctuation, physical attributes of the subject, or question their intelligence.
If I have any input on the subject itself I usually render it.You never say anything constructive. Are the one-liners and quips all you think about?
They're responses to hyperbole. Not exactly constructive.Say's who? My posts add real responses, hyperbole or not.
I only belittle the ones I love.Yours always lead to someone having to respond to you attacking them or belittling them.
Also the child pros ution was real to the ACORN workers.![]()
MJF was being exploited by the Democrats. I don't think that its wrong to question if MJF did that in a political season, but Rush should have checked to find out that people with that disease do that. Rush did apologize for it.
Huzzah Michael J. Fox can forgive him!
About Michael:
I also seen footage of him with the disease, and it does look exaggerated. I'd say Rush is right again.
You just defended someone for acting like a junior high school kid in ridiculing someone with a detrimental disease. My grandfather has Parkinson's and had shakes that would make the ones in the ad by Mr. Fox look relatively sedate. At times he could not even communicate with us because he had absolutely no ability to reasonably control his motor functions.
What you said was de able, and I really have nothing more to say to you, about anything on Spurstalk.
Last edited by Cry Havoc; 09-19-2009 at 02:20 PM.
On friday. Rush said MSM won't even know where to begin to put things out of context for friday...I guess you had to be there.
MJF was completely involved in the politics at that time. He worked with every Democrat he could to get elected. Are saying that because your grandfather had parkinson, that MJF did not fake it? Do you know MJF? Did Al Gore's kiss with his wife in 2000 look normal to you too?
You think a man with Parkinson's Disease FAKED tremors in order to get people to vote for a Senator in Missouri? You really think this?
Listen very carefully. This is my last post to you concerning this dead horse you keep beating. Your lame attempt at debate has failed. Your miserable reasoning wouldn't impress the ambulance chaser lawyer. The greatest part of this story when it comes between you and I is.....Congress sees it my way. The country as a whole sees it my way. Anyone with morals sees it my way. Not your way. Listen carefully again. Not your way. Understand. Most of the country doesn't agree with you. ACORN is done getting money from us, the tax payer.
Now there are a ton of threads here you can try your used car saleman tactics again. This case is closed. Do you finally get it? Is that big brain of yours working now. There has been resolution to this underage illegal pros ion ring ACORN was advising. Really, there has been. That is what should make it easier for you to understand. No more tax payer money goes to ACORN. Both Dems and Republicans agreed. Now sit back and watch the charges to be filed and when the get the books open.....people will be going to jail.
End of discusion. The story is dead. Get over it. Seriously. Move on. Our country is.![]()
You still don't understand my posts have nothing to do with supporting ACORN.
What is your point then?
I do not think you realize the incredibly devastating effects of Parkinson's, and more so, the blow it would do to someone's ego in order to fake the disease for political gain. To do so would have catastrophic effects on a person's psyche, and would call the character of Michael J. Fox into serious question. I'm not entirely sure how you can accuse me of not knowing MJF, but side with Rush based upon his equally uneducated (and hateful) viewpoint. Considering Rush has himself abused medication before, who is he to be casting stones?
I find it unbearably sad (and petty) that you would rather choose to believe someone is faking Parkinson's symptoms rather than disagreeing with someone just because they share your political affiliations.
So I ask you: Do you know MJF? Are you a doctor or someone with an extremely versed background in Parkinson's? If not, how can you possibly validate what Rush said? I've had personal experience with the disease that I used to ascertain that MJF's tremors could absolutely be real. I also have a degree in Psychology, so I would like to think I do have an educational ground to stand on here. I have seen people with shakes much worse even than my grandfathers. To say that there is no correlation suggests that you have some expertise to share on the disease? Was Muhammed Ali faking his symptoms as well?
And comparing this to a kiss is monumentally ridiculous. Just stop.
Last edited by Cry Havoc; 09-19-2009 at 02:20 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)