Please somebody stop him before he posts again.
Noel IgnatievThe white race is a historically constructed social formation. The term "white" race originated with the advent of African Slave trade to colonies in the Americas and elsewhere. It consists of all those who partake of the privileges of the white skin in this society. Its most wretched members share a status higher, in certain respects, than that of the most exalted persons excluded from it, in return for which they give their support to a system that degrades them.
The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race -- in other words, to abolish the privileges of the white skin. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue, domestic and foreign, in U.S. society.
The way to abolish the white race is to challenge, disrupt and eventually overturn the ins utions and behavior patterns that reproduce the privileges of whiteness, including the schools, job and housing markets, and the criminal justice system. The abolitionists do not limit themselves to socially acceptable means of protest, but reject in advance no means of attaining their goal.
We do not hate you or anyone else for the color of her skin. What we hate is a system that confers privileges (and burdens) on people because of their color. It is not fair skin that makes people white; it is fair skin in a certain kind of society, one that attaches social importance to skin color. When we say we want to abolish the white race, we do not mean we want to exterminate people with fair skin. We mean that we want to do away with the social meaning of skin color, thereby abolishing the white race as a social category. Consider this parallel: To be against royalty does not mean wanting to kill the king. It means wanting to do away with crowns, thrones, les, and the privileges attached to them. In our view, whiteness has a lot in common with royalty: they are both social formations that carry unearned advantages
Please somebody stop him before he posts again.
I was just thinking how there weren't nearly enough threads about race here............
It really riles up the right wingers. I'm thinking about posting black nationalism articles next time.
Make sure to work fox news in there somehow. The righties and the lefties will go bonkers. That's a guaranteed 5 page thread there.
I am from one of the most racially segregated areas in the country, and race is never brought up as often as it is here.
segregated?
But you can keep your "black" "hispanic" "mexican" "asian" "el salvadorian" "indian" "filipino" "punjabi" "japanese" colombian," etc. The Europeans just can't be white. That's just not fair. No no no no. God forbid. Oh, and take away the affirmative action...never ever.
![]()
Please do it.
That's not posted anywhere. "Black" is also a racial term created by the creation of "white".
Sure, I'll go ahead and post it so you can use the race card card defense and legitimize anything you have to say.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/segregated
Main Entry: segregated
Function: adjective
Date: 1652
1 a : set apart or separated from others of the same kind or group <a segregated account in a bank> b : divided in facilities or administered separately for members of different groups or races <segregated education> c : restricted to members of one group or one race by a policy of segregation <segregated schools>
2 : practicing or maintaining segregation especially of races <segregated states>
i know what it means. just surprised with the way you described your area.
Well here's an idea that might appeal to you. Why don't you and some of your "rocket science" buddies get together and ride around in a car at night exposing your bare buttcoks to people, I thought it might appeal to someone of your "intelligence." Or perhaps that's all your threads really are...grow some balls dude and try doing it in real life, just wait for warm weather.
Oh, I understood the original post. It was getting back to the "color blind society" that the forefathers of the United States were so keen on.
My post was my opinion and my response.
it appears that micca has some interest in your balls.
So why do we need to get rid of cultures again?
I mean, I'm certainly not opposed to being "color blind" and taking individuals at their individual worth, however, to say that a culture should be abolished is questionable, to say the least.
But whatever, what do I know, my race apparently needs to be abolished.
Oh, I thought you were saying I spelled it wrong or something.
Dont be surprised, there is no way to sugarcoat the Detroit Metro Area.
Detroit City = 80-85% Black
Suburbs surrounding Detroit = 80-85% White
Thems' the facts. People, namely a friend of mine and his wife, have family in other places of the country (they visit South Carolina routinely). They always come back with stories of how un-segregated those areas are (basically, as naivé as this sounds, how many black people you see amongst white people on an everyday basis...not at a sporting event like here in Detroit). About how what a non-issue race is there, whereas here in Detroit, there is a palpable tension between those residents of the city and everyone else.
Last edited by DarkReign; 09-22-2009 at 01:17 PM.
Then you have a very idealized view of this nation's forefathers.
There was no such altruism to be had in their actions or words outside religious neutrality. Most, if not all our forefathers were very rich, happy, slave-owning land barons.
Beyond their goal of getting away from an all-powerful monarchy system and its influence (freedom of speech, press and firearms), their motives were selfish at best.
It's not a real race, it's artificially conjured up. Caucasian includes those from the middle east, but you would hardly find any person today who identified Arabs as white people. Sicilians (Italians) and the Irish were long never identified as white. It's not the culture you are speaking of.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)