Exactly!!
Truth is we're too scared of nudity in this country. Kids naked in a tub does not equal child porn. I hope Wally World ends up making these folks millionaires in their settlement.
I thought you were talking about the OP i.e. the law that the parents were initially accused of violating.
Exactly!!
Truth is we're too scared of nudity in this country. Kids naked in a tub does not equal child porn. I hope Wally World ends up making these folks millionaires in their settlement.
Statutory rape goes state by state. The large majority of states have the age of consent at 16. But, there are a few that I believe are 15 and maybe even 14. I don't think there are any states that have the age of consent older than 16, but there could be a few that have it at 17.
The problem really arises with the language of some of the laws where it doesn't matter what age the alleged "offender" is so teenage couples where the boyfriend is 17 and the girlfriend is 15 could be a problem under the law. But it's really only a problem when it's fanatic, militant parents trying to persecute and prosecute the boyfriend for "tainting" their teenage princess.
uhh, i never said they should have been turned in for it or that they did anything wrong. I just think it's ra ed for parents to use bathtime as a photoshoot.
And people that are "enamored" with being new parents need to get over themselves and their little "accomplishment".
so if the photo guy makes some copies for himself and sells it to freaks he's not breaking the law cause its not porno?
good point trainwreck. mommy and daddy are exposing their children to perverts everywhere by submitting their cute little bathtime photos to STRANGERS working at WALMART that can easily reproduce and distribute them anywhere they like.
That's pretty creepy. All the more reason to do it yourself. All the more reason to never go to Walmart. I think someone posted it's almost like God shook trailer parks into walmart to create a new world.
Some people get their jollies from all kinds of things that don't qualify as pornographic. It's not the parents fault that there are sick people out there. I don't think of pics of kids taking a bath as porn, so I'm not sure if the guy copying the photos is breaking a law other than invasion of someone's privacy. If the kids were involved in some sexual act, then you'd have a child porn issue I think.
The parents definitely should have controlled the pics a little better, but they haven't done anything that millions of other parents haven't done over the years. They ended up losing custody of their kids for a little while, and they were put through , which was truly the crime in all of this.
your a jackass
I actually have no problem with the person in Wal Mart. I believe that they are taught that they have to report anything even remotely su ious, or they could get in a lot of trouble. He or she did as they were told. Then, it is up to law enforcement to decide what to do with it, and that is the place blame should be placed.
I do not agree. I have no photos like this of my child after the age of about 1, and these girls were 4 and 5 years old. 99% of people do not have naked bath photos of their 5-year old kid."Ninety-nine percent of the families in America have these exact same photos."
That's the same point I made, I'd be interested in the opinions/experiences of other parents as well.
Depends what you are doing in the nude.
Granted not all nudity is pornography, but I would guess that the majority of pornography involves nudity.
feel bad for the parents...if they really were innocent. Nothing worse that ppl saying your a pedo for your own child. A real parent could not even think of such horrible things. A good parent anyway..
You obviously don't have kids. It has nothing to do with the "accomplishment" other than the accomplishment of the feeling of love and vulnerability that the parents heretofore didn't know they were capable of. Enamored indeed.
i doubt anyone in the history of the internets has been told this more than thispegoYou obviously don't have kids
The only pics I have of my kids like that are in bubblebaths and nothing shows but their faces. I have one full nude of my oldest once when he escaped and streaked across our backyard; he was about 2 and none of his baby bits show.
It's sad that people have to be careful about such things, but this is the world we live in and no one's gonna look out for us but us!
yup. the methods you go through to have kids are pornographic. no pego there.
I don't have kids yet, but reading the couples' story makes me want to NEVER take any bath time pictures of my kids- no matter how young or bubble covered the kids are.
The pictures are not worth the risk- period.
this +10000000
no, just chances are you were a emotional pussy before you had kids too.
doesn't take kids to know what it's like to have kids. being a parent does not give you some special ability too feel extraordinary love and vulnerability, it just gives you an excuse.
then cry havoc = pussy
you = pussy +10000000
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)