I would go to the police if I thought a 15 year old was raped. I'm just saying. A sophmore in highschool tells me he/she went to the bus station and ed some 26 or older dude I would call the police. Not black and white, girl or boy.
http://www.school-counseling-zone.co...entiality.html
5. What are the limits of confidentiality for school counselors?ethically, school counselors are required to take appropriate action if students engage in behavior that presents clear and imminent danger to themselves and others. Legally, they're required to report known or suspected child abuse or neglect,-
This is not about young teenagers having consentual sex. Even though I am against the normalization of kids having sex, that is a different discussion. This is about a grown man getting close enough to and having sex with a 16 yr old. The man is a predator. If the teacher thought he was 15, what's to say that the predator didn't think the kid was 12 or 13? This goes against our culture's morals. Our country and especially school counselors should be protecting these kids.
School counselors must balance their ethical and legal responsibilities to their clients, clients' parents, and school systems. This complex balancing act is one reason that the topic of maintaining the confidences of student clients is raised in virtually every discussion of ethical and legal issues in school counseling. In attempting to weigh their legal and ethical obligations, it is helpful for school counselors to clearly identify those they consider to be "clients." School counselors are part of an educational community. As such, they consult with teachers, administrators, and parents. It is important for school counselors to clarify that their consultation is on behalf of students and that only the students are their clients
-http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KOC/is_1_6/ai_93700936/the ethical codes and the law are in agreement that confidentiality is to be broken in cases where child abuse is suspected, in cases of harm to self such as attempted suicide, and in cases where clear and imminent danger to others is threatened.
-http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KOC/is_2_6/ai_96194766/?tag=rbxcra.2.a.22
This czar post was created by Bush.And what proper process would that be?Obama should just fire them all and then appoint new guys following a proper process.
I merely want a direct quote from Jennings.
I couldn't help but notice you didn't give one.
So? How is that relevant? What's exactly your point? That the "czar process" shouldn't be eliminated because Bush had czars? Clinton had czars. Bush father had czars. Etc.
why don't you get your own czar?
My point is you didn't give a about the increase in czars under Bush or the process by which they came into office.
Now you care.
I didn't? I don't take accusations of hypocrisy lightly. I also have the principle of not discussing with people that use ad hominem arguments. Please, clarify your statement ASAP. Thanks.
it was pretty clear.
You're welcome.
you should put him on ignore.
how dare he speak to you this way.
Dude where's my Czar?
That is the only thing Chump does.
Find that quote yet?
The other thing I do is ask questions that board Republicans can't answer.
Makes them mad.
Well, I guess you're either going to prove your accusations or confess you're a calumnious liar.
Don't put me in the middle of your petty political guerrillas. That's not something I'm particularly fond of.
Ok, where are your posts denouncing the czars during the Bush administration?
I admit it was an educated guess. Now you can prove me wrong.
you may be too fragile for this place.
you should replace all these threads with new threads that go through a process.
I wasn't posting here during the Bush administration. But that's okay, as I've said I don't engage in conversations with a certain kind of person so no need to pursuit this particular argument.
If you want to retract yourself and have a discussion about the issue of the czars, I'd gladly take part. Stay well.
Is fragile finding if difficult to go through your idiotic posts?
would you like the retraction gift wrapped?
and it might damage your spelling.
You weren't posting anywhere?Which czars were you against during the Bush administration?But that's okay, as I've said I don't engage in conversations with a certain kind of person so no need to pursuit this particular argument.
Nah, I still believe you never gave a about czars until the Obama administration. You have done nothing to dissuade me from that belief.If you want to retract yourself and have a discussion about the issue of the czars, I'd gladly take part. Stay well.
I think that some czars are necessary and some aren't. Always have, always will.
Which Czars were you against when Bush was in office? before Bush? Did you think what they did to Josh Bolton was right? Should all Czars be confirmed by Congress?
As I said, I think some are quite necessary. If you want to produce a list of them, I could pick some out for you. I don't think a federal school safety czar is all that necessary, for example.What did "they" do to Josh Bolten?Did you think what they did to Josh Bolton was right?No.Should all Czars be confirmed by Congress?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
