you a nerd harry potter? why you jockin this stat geeks nuts?
I believe that Jefferson's points per shot stat was slightly higher than Duncan's last year.
you a nerd harry potter? why you jockin this stat geeks nuts?
The problem with thuis type of analysis is that it doesn't look at the context that statistics are created in. Last year Jefferson was the #1 scoring option on a bad team for part of the year and he had to take more low percentage shots. This idea that Jefferson is a low percentage score like Iverson is ridiculous. He is a 35-40% 3 pt shooter, and his Points Per Shot is above average because he gets to the free throw line. Jefferson will get a lot more open looks this year than he did last year.
I wasn't saying Jefferson's game is like Iverson's, I was addressing ChumpDumper's contention that stats in general don't transfer between teams with the example that, at least in one case (Iverson's) it seems that they did.
His points per shot and TS% were both high last year. Jefferson is good at scoring, no debate there. But last year he was below his position averages in rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks, though. Poor TS% isn't the only way to be an inefficient scorer. A player can also be inefficient by having his success at scoring counterbalanced by too many weaknesses in other areas.
Hopefully in the new system he can be a spot up shooter and perimeter defender, and not a primary ball handler. I think that is the role that will best accentuate his strengths and hide his weaknesses.
Almost every sports fan I know uses favorable stats to back up arguments and than talks about how arbitrary and unreliable they are when arguing a point that the stats don't support.
^^ I concur.
Lies, damn lies, and statistics..
Well it is said that an statistician is a person who, having his head in the oven and his feet in the freezer thinks "on average, I feel very good"
lol. that just may become my new sig.
Why do geeks feel the need to try to apply their stats and algorithms and such to sports? You get this stupid trash
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)