Why are liberal journalists and I suppose most white liberal effite men obsessed with Obama's "shape"?
http://www.nba.com/2009/news/10/08/o....ap/index.html
President Barack Obama and a few members of his Cabinet played basketball Thursday night at the White House with a handful of House members, two of them Republicans.
"We ran into a president with some serious game," said Rep. Jay Inslee, D-Wash.
Obama had "a sweet crossover move" and appeared to be in great shape, Inslee said. "He put a real nice move on me and beat me along the base line."
On the president's team were Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Education Secretary Arne Duncan, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan. Also playing with Obama was his personal assistant, Reggie Love, once a forward for the Duke Blue Devils.
Why are liberal journalists and I suppose most white liberal effite men obsessed with Obama's "shape"?
don't ask so many questions
Obama gettin busy beating 60 year old white guys at basketball because he can't handle the presidency.
I'm pretty sure you have a reason why...
He's playing basketball to help create his new policy on Afghanistan. Over a month now and no strategy.
What are all the golf games for .......the economy?
Can't the man take a break from saving the world to play some ball?
Bush never did any athletic activities and still managed to everything up.
I'm starting to think the more breaks he has the greater the worlds chances are.
the ankle-biters are swarming.
It would be fun to play Obama in basketball.
One of the Republicants who was invited is the same worthless asshole who walked out of Obama's healthcare speech. I'm not a good person, so I'd just have assumed see the guy publicly hung with a meathook. But Obama's a good person, and consequently, according to everything that is good and holy and empathetic, it's nice to see Obama turn the other cheek.
He's a much better person than most republicans. Much better.
How long did it take Bush to adopt a new strategy in Iraq when his was clearly failing?
Years.
Did you about it then?
No.
Now you are saying that Bush's failed strategy in Afghanistan needs to be changed immediately.
OK.
Bush gave up golf
Except he didn't -- not for the troops.
He definitely didn't give up clearing brush.
That. At least Obama doesn't have to fly back from basketball in AF1, or take days to do it.
I don't recall Bush being without a strategy. His strategy was doing alot better than Obama's (even though BHO doesn't have a strategy). Bush, privately looked into different ways to fight Iraq and Afghanistan. That is not what BHO is doing.
In State of Denial, it talks about Bush setting up, and creating new strategies. How he told his CMD Gen Casey at the time (the book puts alot of blame on Casey) that they are playing to win, and to let him know what he thinks would help them win.
Every post you do the same thing, "Did you complain when Bush did it", even( for this instance) when Bush didn't do the same as BHO. BHO would have pulled US troops out of Iraq, win or lose, and now he wants to cut and run on the country that attacked us.
Do you have a link of that?
If Obama doesn't have a new strategy in Afghanistan, then we are still working with Bush's strategy. What part of that do you not understand?
Right. How many years did it take to implement a new strategy?In State of Denial, it talks about Bush setting up, and creating new strategies.
It was four years into the war.
Four years.
Why the do you think it was called State of Denial?
I read the book. It puts a lot of blame on Bush.How he told his CMD Gen Casey at the time (the book puts alot of blame on Casey) that they are playing to win, and to let him know what he thinks would help them win.
BHO is not pulling out of Iraq at all right now. You're just lying.Every post you do the same thing, "Did you complain when Bush did it", even( for this instance) when Bush didn't do the same as BHO. BHO would have pulled US troops out of Iraq, win or loseThere is no evidence of that. In fact his administration said pulling out was not an option.and now he wants to cut and run on the country that attacked us.
Why do you have to lie all the time?
The strategy that he said was the wrong strategy to get elected? So a year into his presidency, after a year of campaigning against this strategy, he still doesn't know what to do differently?
What strategy are you referring to?Right. How many years did it take to implement a new strategy?
It was four years into the war.
Four years.
You're sharp. Did you read it or just watch his interview on pmsnbc?Why the do you think it was called State of Denial?
I read the book. It puts a lot of blame on Bush.
What are you saying I lied about? Evidence of what?BHO is not pulling out of Iraq at all right now. You're just lying.There is no evidence of that. In fact his administration said pulling out was not an option.
Why do you have to lie all the time?
Bush was the fastest runner we've had in the white house.. but who gives a if our presidents play golf, ball or run. they need the exercise.
Nine months is not a year. You lied.
Besides, Bush didn't even start discussing a new policy on terror after dismantling that of the previous administration until September 8. so according to your logic, you blame all the deaths of 9/11 on Bush.
You don't know? Sounds about right.What strategy are you referring to?
I read it.You're sharp. Did you read it or just watch his interview on pmsnbc?
nine months = one year.What are you saying I lied about? Evidence of what?
I agree. They also need vacations every once in awhile. It will always be a working vacation, so there is little cause to .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)