Reply With Quote
Because hypocrite you can't tell others to do their homework when you obviously don't!
sorry dueche bag, you already played this card w/ me. way to regurgitate nonsense.
Because hypocrite you can't tell others to do their homework when you obviously don't!
It's nonsense that the difference between marxism, socialism, and fascism is not pronunciation? Ya sure about that?
What do you mean "In the 1977 GLC election he was the International Marxist Group candidate for Lambeth Central." Mr. Corbyn's marxist" bone.. a.. feedes"make him and excellent canidate for a czar post in the Obama whitehouse
That's what I mean.
*yawn* This is like watching the special olympics.
There is no proof. A bunch of fools running around yelling "The sky is falling"
This just in. Phillies vs Rockies postponed because of snow.
Why are you so set on talking about the differences of three socialist ideologies in a global warming post? What are you trying to point out? Are you politicking for a socialist govt? Which one is the one you would base it on? China, Russia, Vietnam, Burma?
LOL...
My God man. Do you realize how stupid it is to judge a person's ability to learn by what schools they attend?
I choose not to waste my time. I'm an autodidact!
I would disagree, but it's obvious that you don't know enough of the basics to teach you the truth. It is a simple reality if you study enough of the geosciences to know that the alarmists are full of . Please note that a Climatologist is on;y one discipline of the geosciences, and in most universities, only require one or two more classes to get a BS in Climatology once you have the lasses to be a Meteorologist.
How often are Meteorologists right?
Yes, I hit the wrong key. I edited and corrected that.
Why? What other source of power is there that heats the Earth to any significant amount? There are two other sources of energy. They are tidal forces generated primarily by the moon, and radioactive elements in the earth. Both these are insignificant compared to the radiant energy of the sun. Even if we use 98%, it changes very little any calculations of solar changes. If you don't understand that, then you won't understand any facts that are contrary to your bias anyway.
For your pleasure, we will call it erroneous if you like. I don't recall all the facts except that it was Hanson was responsible for the calculations, he is a global warming alarmist, and he works for NASA. Gavin Schmidt is another alarmist that works for NASA. You know the site RealClimate that people like to reference? It's his! Funny how his co-authored and peer reviewed NASA work disagree with his RealClimate work...
Shindell et al. 2001:
Wow... That's at least half the global warming right there! Outside his job, he publishes alarmist material end de-emphasizes the sun, but if he lied for a NASA paper, he could lose his job!We examine the climate response to solar irradiance changes between the Blate 17th century Maunder Minimum and the late 18th century. Global average temperature changes are small (about 0.3° to 0.4°C) in both a climate model and empirical reconstructions.
OK, I did a quick search. Here's a bone on the temperature correction:
GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
Fox's Angle misrepresented NASA correction to claim 1934 is now "hottest year" on record; August 12, 2007 2:49 pm ET
I don't claim that CO2 does not warm the earth. Only that there are other causes to, and that at the most, it contributes to maybe 25% of the warming. If we didn't have warming from the sun, we would have less CO2 also because the ocean absorbs 98% of the CO2 we emit. Problem is, the ocean is not in balance when it is warming, so the equilibrium changes.
Judge attacks nine errors in Al Gore's 'alarmist' climate change filmWhat would those be?
My God Man!!! I'm not judging a person's ability to learn. I'm judging you pretending to be a scientist.
Like doing research. Waste of time that research.I choose not to waste my time.
We know you didn't go to college.I'm an autodidact!
So says the fake scientist.I would disagree, but it's obvious that you don't know enough of the basics to teach you the truth. It is a simple reality if you study enough of the geosciences to know that the alarmists are full of .
Says the fake scientist.Please note that a Climatologist is on;y one discipline of the geosciences, and in most universities, only require one or two more classes to get a BS in Climatology once you have the lasses to be a Meteorologist.
Probably more often than fake Meterologists.How often are Meteorologists right?
Yes, I hit the wrong key. I edited and corrected that.100% is > than 99.9%. Your designation is still unscientific.I use > 99.9%. The number is something like 99.998%
I guess I should've called this to attention earlier. We get the vast majority of heat from the sun, yes. But why don't you ever show how much heat retention we have now because of various gases in the atmosphere? You think that hasn't changed?Why? What other source of power is there that heats the Earth to any significant amount? There are two other sources of energy. They are tidal forces generated primarily by the moon, and radioactive elements in the earth. Both these are insignificant compared to the radiant energy of the sun. Even if we use 98%, it changes very little any calculations of solar changes. If you don't understand that, then you won't understand any facts that are contrary to your bias anyway.
No I mean call it "falsified" all you like. I just don't think an actual scientist will like it very much when fake scientists claim they falsified data.For your pleasure, we will call it erroneous if you like.
I'm shocked!I don't recall all the facts
So you are claiming he knowingly falsified data. Fake Scientists Unite!!!except that it was Hanson was responsible for the calculations, he is a global warming alarmist, and he works for NASA.Ok.Gavin Schmidt is another alarmist that works for NASA.
Nope.You know the site RealClimate that people like to reference?
Good for him.It's his!
Not funny. I'd call it interesting.Funny how his co-authored and peer reviewed NASA work disagree with his RealClimate work...
Do fake scientists read the entire article or just the abstract? I'm curious.Wow... That's at least half the global warming right there! Outside his job, he publishes alarmist material end de-emphasizes the sun, but if he lied for a NASA paper, he could lose his job!
So basically Fox lied and this real scientist, Schmidt, was correct. Thanks.OK, I did a quick search. Here's a bone on the temperature correction:
GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
Fox's Angle misrepresented NASA correction to claim 1934 is now "hottest year" on record; August 12, 2007 2:49 pm ET
You're ok with contributing 25% of the warming to the earth?I don't claim that CO2 does not warm the earth. Only that there are other causes to, and that at the most, it contributes to maybe 25% of the warming. If we didn't have warming from the sun, we would have less CO2 also because the ocean absorbs 98% of the CO2 we emit. Problem is, the ocean is not in balance when it is warming, so the equilibrium changes.
So the first "error" is based on knowing the future. Gore said a 20ft rise in sea level could occur in the "near future" and this Judge (another fake scientist?) said it would take millennia.
Second error was Gore said some Pacific atolls have been evacuated. Judge says there's no evidence of that. Nothing to do with the science.
Third is Gore said the Gulf Stream would "shut down". It's likely he didn't mean there would be no more Gulf Stream but that it would cease to exist as we know it. Maybe he didn't mean it that way. It's impossible to know what exactly would happen. Judge says it won't shut down but might "slow down". Still, not a fatal error because even if it merely shifts, that would alter the global climate dramatically.
Fourth error is based on a graph Gore showed. I think he said it was an exact fit of CO2 concentration and aggregate temperatures. There was a correlation but the Judge says it doesn't show what Gore asserts. I would need to see the scene in question.
Fifth "error" is that Gore said the snows of Kilimanjaro disappeared because of global warming. Judge, like the genius he is, says there's no way to prove that's why the snow disappeared. No , really?
Sixth error is along similar lines. It's about Lake Chad drying up and the cause. He said, she said.
Seventh error was Katrina made stronger by global warming. It's entirely possible the hurricane was strengthened while it was over warm water. Is there any way to prove anthropogenic global warming caused that water to warm? No. But hey, let's use that non-proof as proof someone is wrong. Makes sense to me!
The eight error is about Polar Bears. Oh lonely and cuddly polar bears. Gore said there had been polar bears found dead that had drowned because they were swimming longer than usual distances because of melted ice. Judge claims there were no recent reports of that.
Whoops:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...icle767459.ece
The last error was about coral reef bleaching. Bleaching is caused when the photosynthetic organisms living inside the coral are ejected when temperatures are too high. Judge claims there's no way to tell what causes coral bleaching. He's full of .
Shasta either got a degree in english or psychology. He wants to put his diploma in his room but his mom wants it in their family room.
Wrong and wrong. You can keep guessing if you like.
It's actually in a cabinet in the dining room I think. Maybe I can get a fake scientist diploma too and flaunt it here!He wants to put his diploma in his room but his mom wants it in their family room.
physical education?
theatre arts?
Nothing but a tool to give government more control.
Ya'lls hearts are in the right places. I get it, I loved Captain Planet as a kid as well. Government is just doing what Government do; pulling at your heart strings for their own agenda.
Whatever though. Drive your prius, some of us will continue driving 10 mpg V8's. We will all be dead in 80 years. It really doesn't matter.
Nope and nope. Not even close.
There is no way you can convince me that Shasta is still not in high school or that Shasta is a sexually active adult.Just sounds too immature.
Your fantasy of 1) me being underage and 2) my sex life, is getting pretty disturbing.
god you're an idiot..i leave for the day and now come back to your idiocy..
You mean you woke up because your mom has come home and is cleaning up your mess and you are running to get your happy sock before she picks it up.
I'm not going to bother pointing out the irony here. I'm just going to quote it so that those who are capable of finding it do so.
You WC, are a treasure trove of bull and hilarity.
Feel free to continue.
Your cabinet, or Mommy's?
Why are the board republicans so obsessed with fantasies of underage boys?
I never suggested you were a boy.
So you regularly refer to other people's mothers as "mommy"? Creepy.
It's quite obvious that the 3% human contribution to a gas that makes up 0.038% of the atmosphere is reponsible for all the warming that were NOT observing.
Time to move to higher ground.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions