Obama bored with economy, plays basketball with his cabinet

[MiamiHeat]

Are you saying WWI was not a conventional war?

Just say it.

We're waiting.

You said it was a conventional war.

Show me your definition so I may judge.

[MiamiHeat]

Sorry I owned you like that.

nah you're just trolling, i can tell a long time ago. you did a terrible job

[Shastafarian]

Are you saying WWI was not a conventional war?

Just say it.

We're waiting.

It's ok. His reply with such a swift moving of goal posts shows everyone he's wrong.

[Shastafarian]

nah you're just trolling, i can tell

So are you saying World War 1 was an unconventional war? Answer the question and I'll give you my definition of conventional warfare.

[MiamiHeat]

You lose, american assholes.

don't you have any pride hahahahah

[ChumpDumper]

Damn, you are getting spanked.

That WWI thing really threw you for a loop. You can't even argue against it's being a conventional war.

That's because you know you can't.

[Shastafarian]

Is this guy high or something?

[George Gervin's Afro]

Huh? I'm saying chemical weapons don't = unconventional warfare. You have yet to provide something that refutes that.

In a general sense I do. You don't seem to.

My source for knowing the difference between conventional and unconventional warfare? Are you joking?

he's not joking. he's an idiot.

[MiamiHeat]

So

Fallujah = unconventional warfare. Nobody has shown any proof to dispute it.


Thread over.

[George Gervin's Afro]

So

Fallujah = unconventional warfare. Nobody has shown any proof to dispute it.


Thread over... in my head.

[MiamiHeat]

Damn, you are getting spanked.

That WWI thing really threw you for a loop. You can't even argue against it's being a conventional war.

That's because you know you can't.

and 10 posts later, you STILL have ran away from posting your definiton of conventional warfare

because once you do, you know you lost.

[Shastafarian]

and 10 posts later, you STILL have ran away from posting your definiton of conventional warfare

because once you do, you know you lost.

Not really. I'm pretty sure you lost when you dodged the question about World War 1 being conventional or unconventional.

[George Gervin's Afro]

So

Fallujah = unconventional warfare. Nobody has shown any proof to dispute it.


Thread over.

so i guess using your logic WWII wasn't a conventional war. good luck selling that one..

[spursncowboys]

He said "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended."

That's the quote.

He was wrong.

You are wrong.

Less than a Battalion of Marines fighting a militia is not a "major" combat op.

[MiamiHeat]

Not really. I'm pretty sure you lost when you dodged the question about World War 1 being conventional or unconventional.

1) Show me your definiton of conventional warfare so I can judge if it's conventional or not.

and secondly, only AFTER you complete #1,

2) tell me why it is relevant to the discussion.

[MiamiHeat]

so i guess using your logic WWII wasn't a conventional war. good luck selling that one..

Do you have a problem with the US military and the world's definition of conventional warfare?

take it up with them.

[Shastafarian]

1) Show me your definiton of conventional warfare so I can judge if it's conventional or not.

Are you saying you're waiting on my definition to determine whether World War 1 was conventional or not?

and secondly, only AFTER you complete #1,

2) tell me why it is relevant to the discussion.

You're the one asking for it. It's not relevant if you ask me. Why can't you answer a simple question about World War 1?

[ChumpDumper]

and 10 posts later, you STILL have ran away from posting your definiton of conventional warfare

because once you do, you know you lost.

I'm just showing how much your definition sucks.

Mission accomplished.

[George Gervin's Afro]

1) Show me your definiton of conventional warfare so I can judge if it's conventional or not.

and secondly, only AFTER you complete #1,

2) tell me why it is relevant to the discussion.

it's relevant because logically that's what you are claiming now. you do have an understanding of the term logic ..don't you? logic is a if you aren't on the right side of it...

[MiamiHeat]

You're the one asking for it. It's not relevant if you ask me. Why can't you answer a simple question about World War 1?

YOUR SIDE brought it up.

YOUR SIDE made a claim "World War I was conventional war"

ok, show me your proof of this.

Dumper made the claim. Show me the proof.

[MiamiHeat]

I'm just showing how much your definition sucks.

Mission accomplished.

Ok. Where is your definiton then?

Show it.

If you can't show a definiton for it, then mine is still valid and I still remain unchallenged.

[ChumpDumper]

Less than a Battalion of Marines fighting a militia is not a "major" combat op.

Tell that to the marines. To their faces. Let me know how that goes for you.

And 2000 is more than a battalion. Tell them you think it isn't true as well.

[ChumpDumper]

Ok. Where is your definiton then?

Show it.

If you can't show a definiton for it, then mine is still valid and I still remain unchallenged.

Are you saying WWI was an unconventional war?

Yes or no.

If yes, I challenge that.

[Shastafarian]

He thinks World War 1 was unconventional.

[spursncowboys]

we used white phospherous on insurgents during the battle of fallujah. it's not a war and this just proves what an idiot you are.

How did we use them? Was it to illuminate, and flush out the enemy? Did we tell the civilians to watch out and clean their house afterwards?
"It is well within the law of war to use those weapons as they're being used, for marking and for screening... A bullet goes through skin even faster than white phosphorus does".[7] Gen Pace
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_phosphorus