Reply With Quote
I'm saying that this stuff needs to be investigated....that's why I want a completely independent investigation...starting with WTC7...
We post a video it's funny and fake you post a video it's real and fact, anyone notice a pattern here?
I'm saying that this stuff needs to be investigated....that's why I want a completely independent investigation...starting with WTC7...
Trying to get that through Chump's thick crow magnum head is like trying to get the 9/11 commission to write a book worth reading.
But after watching this clip it all makes sense now.
Seriously, we spend millions on ice we let melt on an airport runway...what's a reinvestigation gonna costs? 100 million? .... best damn $100 million we'll ever spend, provided that the committee isn't made up of political good-ole boys...
Pfff...
Every-time you make a prediction (based on your facts) you turn out to be wrong....like the time you predicted we wouldn't see $4 gas for 5 years, what'd that take, 1.5 years to prove you wrong....now your making predictions about a sluggish economy that will 'take a decade to recover from'.....while some of us who saw the bigger picture are basking in the profits of a 10000 Dow... your like the golden goose.....keep it up and I'll keep betting against you....
Are you saying the videos you posted need to be investigated?
Seriously, that hurt my brain.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cro-Magnon
More recycled, disproven hash.
This is another one of those "no-planers". "all the video is faked" bla bla bla.
Never mind all the eyewitness accounts of large passenger planes, they are all in on it.
Never mind the media, they are all in on it too.
So many people are in on this conspiracy.. why have none of these people who are in on it come forward, even anonymously?
GMAFB.
Here we go again.
New is being thrown against the wall to see if it sticks.
Yay.
I actually didn't predict that thing about the gas. I do believe that gas will get more expensive on a fairly sustained basis for the rest of my life.
Feel free to post a link to the comment you think I made regarding that.
You keep your money in the Dow, Dan, it is a fairly good investment long term. I stand by my predictions about the economy. You might want to stop equating the dow withe the economy, though. The two are linked but not synonymous.
Eye-witness accounts are trustworthy, but the corporate media in this country isn't worth . It definitely indoctrinates people, whether it's beating the drum for the invasion of Iraq, constraining the healthcare debate so that logical options like Medicare for all are never discussed, always acting like at worst, the Iraq fiasco was good intentions gone wrong instead of military aggression, and so on.
Good Lord! This crackpot is a Texas A&M professor? That's embarassing.
Shameless self serving bump #1,497
Worthy.
The combination of high productivity due to low employment and stimulus spending is a investor's dream...You keep your money in the Dow, Dan, it is a fairly good investment long term. I stand by my predictions about the economy. You might want to stop equating the dow withe the economy, though. The two are linked but not synonymous
Eat this.
Some light reading.
Some more lite reading
Link
Oh man. A heiwa link?
Oh man. A heiwa link?
The Missing Jolt
Why are shipbuilders and professors of religion the only people writing papers about 9/11?
OK, the shipbuilder's theory is that if you dropped the upper block of the WTC on the rest of the building from an al ude of as much as one mile, the lower part of the building would simply catch it and it would still be up there to this day.
He actually tried to liken it to a collision of two ships. "Both ships are damaged, and after a while the local destruction is arrested, etc."
He's a laugh riot.
Care to address Tony Szamboti?
Yes, and his theology professor partner -- don't forget him.
A normal video simply does not have the frame rate required to measure the brief deceleration that would occur in such a collapse. Had they bothered to model the collapse, they could have figured this out.
Also, it is well known that the tower tops tilted when they fell, so the impacts on the lower floors were never going to be uniform.
The Bazant paper and the NIST never really addressed exact points of acceleration or deceleration or impact. They didn't have to. All they had to find out if collapse was going to happen with the forces involved. They simplified their model with a rigid upper block that fell straight down to show this, and nutters thought they were saying this is officially what happened.
Bazant and Zhou actually made a model that would have been the best case scenario for a collapse that would have a chance of resulting in the bottom block's "catching" the top block and arresting the collapse: a rigid top block falling directly and uniformly down onto the lower block.
And it still collapsed.
Neither Bjorkman, Szamboti or MacQueen could ever figure that out.
Bažant suggested that heat from the fires was a key factor, causing steel columns in both the core and the perimeter to weaken and experience deformation, before losing their carrying capacity and buckling.
...next...
Bažant suggested that heat from the fires was a key factor, causing steel columns in both the core and the perimeter to weaken and experience deformation, before losing their carrying capacity and buckling.
...next...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
