Page 4 of 29 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 707
  1. #76
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    Dude your needle is stuck bump the turntable you can't wrap your head around this anymore than the snake handler can wrap his head around the ascent of man.
    You'd make a good senator the way you can say stupid and then spin.

  2. #77
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    687
    NO you ing wouldn't you're an ideolouge.There are tons of sites like the NOI you choose to ignore them in your unrelenting search for the truth.
    Some of the first and some of the present's most gallant and brilliant scientist have been men of faith, they found no problem with having both in thier lives. I don't see how lesser minds can not stop and ponder this before they start flinging arrows.
    I don't have a problem with them either. Most people like that didn't confuse their lives with nonsense you're willing to propagate.

  3. #78
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,642
    Ah yes.

    The enlightened, powerful, elitist mind of the non-believer.

    Condescending to the last.
    parting the Reed Sea
    fify

  4. #79
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,642
    It is no easier to prove there is no God. Try it.
    define God

  5. #80
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,642
    Evolution might as well be a religion since it is operated on faith.
    this gets my vote for best line

  6. #81
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,642
    When you open your mouth doesn't come flying out? That is proof matter originates from the creator.
    from you it does. I have proof.

  7. #82
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,642
    .....you can't wrap your head around this anymore than the snake handler can wrap his head around the ascent of man.
    wtf?

  8. #83
    Moss is Da Sauce! mouse's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    26,358
    Save us all some time answering you and look in the mirror. You seem to have all the God like qualities many look for in a Creator. Your strong,smart,and very talented. If only you could apply this same passion you use hating the Christians at ST and go to nursing school.
    Just think you can work in the X-Ray department and carbon date peoples bones as you check for cancer.

  9. #84
    Displaced 101A's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    7,711
    Evolution might as well be a religion since it is operated on faith.
    Evolution is not theory.

    It is verified, scientific fact - it happens.

    Darwin's premise of "natural selection" is what is theory.

    You don't help your cause by being ignorant.

  10. #85
    Displaced 101A's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    7,711
    How do you reason the "bible" is that source, (I'm assuming the new testament) more of an authority than the Torah, or Quran alone. How do you reason it compared to other religions? You can't.

    I'm not arguing against your "god". However, when you analyze the specifics of what your god's prescription in the bible, it doesn't hold much weight. Some things in that text are just flat lies, some can be construed as truths, but it takes some creative thinking.

    You have to keep in mind, all of these books are written by man. When you give credibility to that book and man (or woman) in doing so, you lose credibility. Man (or woman) is in imperfect

    Wow. I never thought of that!

    There's other religions? Who knew?

    It's not like I'm 41 years old, been through the very same logical, rational, very enlightened exercise you are going through now, and ultimately came out the other side with a different perspective.

  11. #86
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    rick ramashing and sir fred hoyle calculated the probability for one cell to evolve by chance. The atheist/agnostic team found to their disbelief that it is 1 chance in 10 to the 40,000th power years just for one cell to evolve. Hoyle said, "the chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that 'a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a boeing 747 from the materials therein.' "[3]
    3. Sir fred hoyle (english astronomer), 'hoyle on the evolution'. Nature, vol. 294, 12 november 1981, p. 105.
    http://www.trueauthority.com/cvse/fiftyreasons.htm
    Hoyle's Fallacy

  12. #87
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Sorry Cowboy, I have to agree with ElNono on this.

    The odds that one cell could change are so highly improbable, but when you throw in the mix of billions of star systems, billions of years, and countless molecules, etc, something remarkable can happen. Like the Poweball, but on a larger scale. The chances of any one ticket winning it is so ridiculously thin, but when you contemplate the hundreds of millions of games played, someone eventuality wins.

    I am a believe of both evolution and intelligent design. I believe a higher power, may it be God(s) or aliens, had an influence on the natural development.

  13. #88
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    Evolution is not theory.

    It is verified, scientific fact - it happens.

    Darwin's premise of "natural selection" is what is theory.

    You don't help your cause by being ignorant.
    Scientific Theory isn't theory in the sense that I have a theory about who you voted for. If you knew anything about science you'd know that.

  14. #89
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    You clearly stated you agreed that evolution is faith and now you're backpedaling because it's an incredibly stupid idea to try to equate scientific knowledge with blind faith.
    You are thinking of me. Evolution isn't based on facts. Show me how it is. It is theories and ideas.

  15. #90
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    You are thinking of me. Evolution isn't based on facts. Show me how it is. It is theories and ideas.
    Evolution is based on observations. Religion is based on a book of stories.

  16. #91
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    Evolution is not theory.

    It is verified, scientific fact - it happens.

    Darwin's premise of "natural selection" is what is theory.

    You don't help your cause by being ignorant.
    So there is factual data that shows humans coming from apes?

  17. #92
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    So there is factual data that shows humans coming from apes?
    Yeah. It's called genetics.

  18. #93
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    1,476
    Evolution is based on observations. Religion is based on a book of stories.
    ?religon is based on a book of stories?

  19. #94
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    ?religon is based on a book of stories?
    Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are based on books are they not?

  20. #95
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    Evolution is based on observations. Religion is based on a book of stories.
    Merrian Webster - evolution: a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations.

  21. #96
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are based on books are they not?
    Christianity isn't.

  22. #97
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    Yeah. It's called genetics.
    That is not factual data that shows any organism evolved to a more complex organism.

  23. #98
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    1,476
    judaism, christianity, and islam are based on books are they not?
    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh..... Nah.

  24. #99
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    ...many evolutionary propagandists are guilty of the deceitful practice of equivocation, that is, switching the meaning of a single word (evolution) part way through an argument. A common tactic, ‘bait-and-switch,’ is simply to produce examples of change over time, call this ‘evolution,’ then imply that the GTE [General Theory of Evolution] is thereby proven or even essential, and creation disproved. The PBS Evolution series and the Scientific American article are full of examples of this fallacy.
    Dr. Jonathan Safati

  25. #100
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    What's it based on then?

    That is not factual data that shows any organism evolved to a more complex organism.
    Partially it is. Then you could look at logous structures and the genes behind them. But you won't because you have no idea what I'm talking about

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh..... Nah.
    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh yeah

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •