See above.
If you think it's because he's Republican, you would have to show that all the other owners are not Republican supporters, which simply isn't true.
What is it then?
See above.
If you think it's because he's Republican, you would have to show that all the other owners are not Republican supporters, which simply isn't true.
Has he committed a crime?
Should NFL players be kept out of the hall of fame for making any kind of provocative public statements?
"Look, let me put it to you this way: The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it."
"I mean, let's face it, we didn't have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: Slavery built the South. I'm not saying we should bring it back. I'm just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark."
"The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies."
--
Yep. Nothing racist about Rush.I can't even believe this is a debated issue.
Some involving prescription drugs, probably -- though he seemed to have settled them without being convicted.
They could conceivably be kept out of ownership groups, which is what we are talking about after all.
I'm pretty sure the first quote can be attributed to him. Do you have any audio or video links to the other two?
I agree that they conceivably CAN. But SHOULD they?
Depends on what they say. I'm sure the NFL owners have a lower tolerance for this kind of thing than you or I, but when that kind of money is involved, many prefer to play it safe.
The owners never voted. It was Sharpton and Franken strong arming goodell. They should have let the owners voted.
sharpton and jackson are for the most part useless..rush's chickens have come home to roost
^ the vehicle of choice for the Revs Jackson and Sharpton.
I completely agree with you there.
Rush is going to up now.
Good game by the clowns though.
I thought Limbaughs partners told him he was out.
lol... Rush is throwing a ing tantrum.
I actually listened to Limbaugh today. This is as untrue as the made up quotes.
Disappointed? Sure. "Throwing a ing tantrum?" Hardly. He was pretty sanguine about the whole thing.
I'd like to hear you describe the behavior, in which he engaged, that led you to the conclusion he threw a " ing tantrum."
In fact, he told the listeners today that he warned his partners this would happen. They assured him that his involvement in the deal was a done deal and that it had been discussed among the league without any dissenters.
Limbaugh said his partner called him Tuesday evening and asked him to withdraw from the partnership. Rush refused and said he was going to have to fire him. He called back Wednesday and did just that...saying it would be announced this morning. It was leaked to ESPN Wednesday.
I never detected anger in his voice and I certainly never thought he was approaching an Olbermannesque temper tantrum.
Do you just make up?
he was blubbering today.
So, you listened?
At what point was he blubbering? I never heard his voice break with emotion or rise in anger. It was a pretty matter-of-fact telling of the events from his perspective.
yes, he's blubbering.
i don't know why. he couldn't have lost any investment.
In fact, you're right, he didn't lose any money...something else he noted today.
Again, please describe the blubbering and temper tantrum.
he was bawling in private.
i thought he showed some real restraint.
too bad he didn't invest. he could have sued his wimpy partners.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)