Quick creationists! Come up with something!

[mouse]

Shastafarian

Do you have any idea how they came to the 60 million number?

[mouse]

Oh so if they evolved that was ok. You wouldn't care.

Why should I?
Is coming from snail or soup going to get me more money when income tax time comes?

I will say again, I am about science books in the "classroom" that are teaching unproven theories and lies what part of that did you miss?

Do you own these textbooks?

You bet I do my tax dollars pay for your kids to learn lies every day.

[ChumpDumper]

So what should they be teaching in school?

[mouse]

Just read the ice core stuff.

They don't visually date the ice. They date using gas molecules.

The bottom line they pulled out a long ice core and say on the "TV" channel we can now see how the weather was 20 million years ago and that is bull and I debunked it so just give me my props and lets move on to more of your half baked theories.

[mouse]

So what should they be teaching in school?

Well how about Nursing, or how to work on jet engines? when was the last time a wall mart employee's had to know Texas history or how man came about on earth? How does any of that help kids today get to be smart?

I used to make fun of China for teaching their kids how to load an AK47 at the age of 7 years old now I envy them.

You can still teach evolution just point out the gaps and holes in the theories why so hard to do?

[mouse]

I believe in floods.

Do you believe at one time maybe 6 to 10 thousand years ago the earth was flooded?

[Shastafarian]

What lies are being taught again? The ice core theory, which isn't even correctly represented, is something you yourself claim is on "TV". So what lies are being taught in school? What gaps are not being discussed?

[ChumpDumper]

Do you believe at one time maybe 6 to 10 thousand years ago the earth was flooded?

The whole thing?

Probably not.

[Shastafarian]

Shastafarian

Do you have any idea how they came to the 60 million number?

Maybe they asked the superior beings who created it.

[z0sa]

Why are these new findings between the time periods of long tail/short tail? In this same vein, what proof do we have concerning the time periods themselves? Why is one considered later in time than the other, and these in the middle of that timespan?

Why is one more 'advanced' than the other, while the newest find is in the middle in terms of 'advancement'?

How are their ages ascertained? Are only pterodactyls found?

What killed them, and why were they grouped together?

[ChumpDumper]

long ago super intelligent beings found a planet with water food and air and left many human life forms in different regions of the earth to monitor them and see how well they do. Some advanced and became smart while others never did developed enough intelligence and started to believe they evolved from snails.

When did they leave humans here?

[mouse]

The whole thing?

Probably not.

What regions of earth would you say was covered in water? America, UK, Africa? Any clue or personal guess on how deep?

[ChumpDumper]

Why are these new findings between the time periods of long tail/short tail? In this same vein, what proof do we have concerning the time periods themselves? Why is one considered later in time than the other, and these in the middle of that timespan?

Why is one more 'advanced' than the other, while the newest find is in the middle in terms of 'advancement'?

How are their ages ascertained? Are only pterodactyls found?

What killed them, and why were they grouped together?

Why did they fossilize?

Did you seriously expect all those questions to be answered in a CNN story?

I suggest you read the published journal article cited at the end if you really care that much. Something tells me you don't and these are just trolling questions.

[mouse]

When did they leave humans here?

Good question. I can't say for sure I can only say how long the earth could sustain life forms and air water etc.. I may not know when a person first drove their car but I can kinda can almost figure out how long their car has been around.

So if you look at the evidence w/o the blinders you can see many years the earth has been here, 60,000 years, or maybe to satisfy the mases a million years?

You see I can meet you half way, It's when you say billions of years that I have to say your full of .

[ChumpDumper]

Good question. I can't say for sure I can only say how long the earth could sustain life forms and air water etc.. I may not know when a person first drove their car but I can kinda can almost figure out how long their car has been around.

So if you look at the evidence w/o the blinders you can see many years the earth has been here, 60,000 years, or maybe to satisfy the mases a million years?

You see I can meet you half way, It's when you say billions of years that I have to say your full of .

Why is a million more acceptable than billions?

[z0sa]

Did you seriously expect all those questions to be answered in a CNN story?

As I expected. You have no clue. You just full-frontally bought everything the article stuffed your mouth full of without a shred of hard, real details to go along with it - except for a few pictures of pterodactyl fossils Good thing those scientists don't have any bias or anything.

What if the pterodactyls were discovered in the wrong type of rock? What if they were discovered with creatures from a different time period? You don't even think of these things because you're brainwashed into thinking they got it all covered without your inquiry, Dump. Hence lies the problem: we don't have enough information, and what information is given is vague and biased.

I suggest you read the published journal article cited at the end if you really care that much. Something tells me you don't and these are just trolling questions.

They're definitely leading questions - to make you question the integrity of the writer/researchers and the proposed factuality of the findings.

[ChumpDumper]

As I expected. You have no clue. You just full-frontally bought everything the article stuffed your mouth full of without a shred of hard, real details to go along with it - except for a few pictures of pterodactyl fossils Good thing those scientists don't have any bias or anything.

What if the pterodactyls were discovered in the wrong type of rock? What if they were discovered with creatures from a different time period? You don't even think of these things because you're brainwashed into thinking they got it all covered without your inquiry, Dump. Hence lies the problem: we don't have enough information, and what information is given is vague and biased.

So you haven't looked at the journal.

They're definitely leading questions - to make you question the integrity of the writer/researchers and the proposed factuality of the findings.

So you aren't interested in looking at the journal.

Troll.

[z0sa]

So you haven't looked at the journal.

So you aren't interested in looking at the journal.

Troll.

It's fairly obvious where I was leading:

If you can't answer the questions, you were facefed supposed facts without even checking the journal, Dump. You let the writer of the article form your opinion for you.

Therefore, we can assume you don't actually know about the subject at hand.

[ChumpDumper]

It's fairly obvious where I was leading:

If you can't answer the questions, you were facefed supposed facts without even checking the journal, Dump. You let the writer of the article form your opinion for you.

And yet, you have done nothing to refute or even challenge anything presented in the article, much less the journal.

I only have a passing interest in the subject. It is obviously more important to you.

But all you did was troll.

[z0sa]

And yet, you have done nothing to refute or even challenge anything presented in the article, much less the journal.

It should be easy for you to answer the questions then.

I only have a passing interest in the subject. It is obviously more important to you.

You can foresee what's about to happen, don't you?

Coward.

But all you did was troll.

Those leading questions have a purpose - unlike yours.

[ChumpDumper]

It should be easy for you to answer the questions then.

My answer is this: I bet everything you are looking for is in the journal, since CNN articles don't usually go into such detail for anything.

You can foresee what's about to happen, don't you?

Absolutely.

Coward.

Nah, you haven't refuted anything yet. You aren't good at this.

Those leading questions have a purpose - unlike yours.

They serve no purpose because you won't even look at the journal. You care enough to and troll, but you won't even try to answer your own questions which are mostly matters of fact that are readily available to you and anyone else who purports to care so deeply about this.

Have you looked at the journal?

[mouse]

What lies are being taught again? The ice core theory, which isn't even correctly represented, is something you yourself claim is on "TV". So what lies are being taught in school? What gaps are not being discussed?

[z0sa]

My answer is this: I bet everything you are looking for is in the journal, since CNN articles don't usually go into such detail for anything.

So you admit to not actually checking the facts behind the article.

Nah, you haven't refuted anything yet. You aren't good at this.

Then answer the questions.

You aren't fooling anyone, Dump. You've trolled your way throughout this entire thread with various questions and assertions, yet you have no actual knowledge concerning the subject.

You're simply trolling. Therefore, I humbly ask you to not respond to my replies.

They serve no purpose because you won't even look at the journal.

You haven't. We can be very sure of that, and even if you go back and look now, it won't matter. You're a phony, a troll posing as a knowledgable poster. If you have nothing to do other than troll, just admit it and be done with it.

I care enough to and troll, but I won't even try to answer your own questions which, according to my ignorant ass, are mostly matters of fact that are hopefully readily available to you and anyone else who purports to care so deeply about this.

Where did I purport to care so deeply? Judging from the apparent criterion, you care more deeply, considering you have more posts in this topic than I do.

Have you looked at the journal article?

Oh yes. I studied it and several articles before even attempting to post in thread. I check my facts and develop a sort of thesis when heading in to these topics.

You have derailed my inquiry twice now, please stop troll.

[mouse]

Why is a million more acceptable than billions?

The moon is drifting further away from the earth each year so 20,000 years can be believable, it would only bring the moon closer the earth a few miles a million years can maybe be possible, But Billions of years? That would put the earth and the Moon touching each other and not to mention the huge tides it would cause. The earth would completely food over twice a day.


Comets! they have a life span of 10,000 years. how can a comet stay burning over millions of years?

[Shastafarian]

So the most recent example is from 1999. You're disproving "lies" from 10 years ago. Thanks.

Where are the lies in these?