Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 60
  1. #1
    Silence surpasses speech. duncan228's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    27,693
    Hairston, Williams hold own
    Jeff McDonald

    For the Spurs' Malik Hairston and Marcus Williams, D-Day has almost arrived. Five days remain before the NBA's roster deadline Monday, and they have almost certainly begun to do the math.

    There is one likely spot up for grabs. Two legitimate contenders for it. One preseason game left.

    Put together, that's not a lot of time to make a closing argument.

    Hairston, a 6-foot-5 second-year forward, and Williams, a 6-foot-7 third-year wing, both have fans throughout the Spurs' organization.

    Both are former second-round picks, and both are former Development League All-Stars. Spurs coach Gregg Popovich doesn't seem eager to cut either.

    “They've steadily improved since the day they became a part of the program,” Popovich said. “They've put in their time in the D-League in Austin and summer leagues with us. They've both continued to develop nicely.”

    Hairston was obtained in a draft-day deal with Phoenix in 2008, part of the same trade that also gave the Spurs the No. 37 pick used to select rookie DeJuan Blair this year. He appears to be a front-runner for the Spurs' 15th and final spot after following a successful run in the Las Vegas summer league.

    Williams, who lost time during the summer due to a wrist injury, has played more sparingly this preseason. He did not play against Oklahoma City on Tuesday.

    The Spurs could save some money by declining to keep a full complement of 15 players. Popovich intimated earlier this offseason that a non-guaranteed player would have to wow him to make the team.

    Whatever happens to Hairston and Williams, Popovich is confident that cut day won't be the last he sees of them.

    “They're both going to have a place in the league,” Popovich said. “They're good enough to be in the league and will make a team.”

    Work in progress: Popovich released some semblance of a regular rotation during the 119-102 win over Oklahoma City.

    The result? The Spurs hit 14 of 19 3-point shots, had five players score at least 13 points, and eclipsed the century mark with 10:08 to play.

    Not bad considering many of the combinations Popovich used were playing together for the first time.

    “It's like every timeout there's still a lot of questions being asked, a lot of things needing to be explained,” new small forward Richard Jefferson said. “Sooner or later, it's going to be a matter of everybody knowing their job and just needing to go out and execute it.”

  2. #2
    Ballin' is a habit... TIMMYD!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    6,170
    Hairston better make it.

  3. #3
    Just agree, and shut up! celldweller's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    815
    No brainer!?! Hairston > Williams. So we all think.

  4. #4
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Anyone care to guess on the likelihood of the 3 possible outcomes?

    I'd say:

    Malik: 40%
    Neither: 40%
    Marcus: 20%

  5. #5
    Just agree, and shut up! celldweller's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    815
    With Finley gone next year, Malik is ideal for his spot. IMHO. Common Pop, don't blow this one.

  6. #6
    Reppin' Timmy's homeland. VI_Massive's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    960
    Anyone care to guess on the likelihood of the 3 possible outcomes?

    I'd say:

    Malik: 40%
    Neither: 40%
    Marcus: 20%
    If neither, who takes the spot of the one who otherwise would make it?

  7. #7
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    If neither, who takes the spot of the one who otherwise would make it?
    Nobody? I think the minimum is 13 players on the roster, 15 max (Please somebody correct me if I'm wrong)

  8. #8
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Nobody? I think the minimum is 13 players on the roster, 15 max (Please somebody correct me if I'm wrong)
    You are correct. You only have to carry 13, but can carry anywhere from 13 up to 15. If the Spurs cut both, they'll likely go with 14.

  9. #9
    Reppin' Timmy's homeland. VI_Massive's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    960
    Nobody? I think the minimum is 13 players on the roster, 15 max (Please somebody correct me if I'm wrong)
    Duncan
    Parker
    Ginobili
    Mason
    Jefferson
    Blair
    McDyess
    Ratliff
    Haislip
    Bonner
    Finley
    Mahinmi
    Bogans
    Hill

    Presuming these guys are the 14, why would we not take a 15th? That means the decision comes down to, as the article suggests, Hairston vs. Williams. So its gotta be one or the other, right? Unless we want to drop one of the above 14....

  10. #10
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Duncan
    Parker
    Ginobili
    Mason
    Jefferson
    Blair
    McDyess
    Ratliff
    Haislip
    Bonner
    Finley
    Mahinmi
    Bogans
    Hill

    Presuming these guys are the 14, why would we not take a 15th? That means the decision comes down to, as the article suggests, Hairston vs. Williams. So its gotta be one or the other, right? Unless we want to drop one of the above 14....
    Not keeping either player results in a savings of slightly more than 1.5M in salary and tax.

  11. #11
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Duncan
    Parker
    Ginobili
    Mason
    Jefferson
    Blair
    McDyess
    Ratliff
    Haislip
    Bonner
    Finley
    Mahinmi
    Bogans
    Hill

    Presuming these guys are the 14, why would we not take a 15th? That means the decision comes down to, as the article suggests, Hairston vs. Williams. So its gotta be one or the other, right? Unless we want to drop one of the above 14....
    Money. The Spurs are in heavy tax territory, and footing a 1.5 or 1.6 million tab for a 15th player who will almost never see the floor might be more than they want to pay. I don't think it's one or the other, I think it's one or none.

  12. #12
    Reppin' Timmy's homeland. VI_Massive's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    960
    Not keeping either player results in a savings of slightly more than 1.5M in salary and tax.
    But at this point, when we've already committed to spending a lot, and have invested a lot of time and money into both guys, arguably more into Hairston, but still, why wouldn't we carry one of the two into the regular season? That amount of money, given the decisions the team has made to spend for a championship in the immediacy, doesn't seem cost prohibitive.

  13. #13
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    But at this point, when we've already committed to spending a lot, and have invested a lot of time and money into both guys, arguably more into Hairston, but still, why wouldn't we carry one of the two into the regular season? That amount of money, given the decisions the team has made to spend for a championship in the immediacy, doesn't seem cost prohibitive.
    How many season tickets have you bought?

  14. #14
    Reppin' Timmy's homeland. VI_Massive's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    960
    Money. The Spurs are in heavy tax territory, and footing a 1.5 or 1.6 million tab for a 15th player who will almost never see the floor might be more than they want to pay. I don't think it's one or the other, I think it's one or none.
    But isn't one or the other the same as one or none? We're talking about a 15th man on a maximum 15 man roster. I'm just saying that since the team has already committed so much money to winning this year, don't you think they'll make a (admittedly hard) decision to pick either Williams or Hairston for the 15th slot?

  15. #15
    Reppin' Timmy's homeland. VI_Massive's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    960
    How many season tickets have you bought?
    As many as I can find.

  16. #16
    obligatory troll smasher Flux451's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    1,311
    If only I had money to buy a sign dragged by a plane just as Pop is leaving his favorite winery. "Spurstalk majority thinks Hairston should make the team."

    How Pop would make his decision right then and there.

    We are Pop.

  17. #17
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    As many as I can find.
    Have you spent money on tickets for games you will not attend?

  18. #18
    Believe. barbacoataco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    1,519
    I hope Hairston makes it.

  19. #19
    Believe. barbacoataco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    1,519
    Another thing to look at is the investment they've made in the Toros. The Spurs want to show fans that it is worth their time to watch them and follow the players. Isn't there a possibility of cutting either Bogans or Haislip?

  20. #20
    Reppin' Timmy's homeland. VI_Massive's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    960
    Have you spent money on tickets for games you will not attend?
    I'm not sure what this has to do with the topic. I guess it goes to a "1.5 million is not an insignificant amount" argument, but given that the team has already committed to spending a lot over the next year or two, and has invested time and money in developing both Hairston and Williams (again, probably more in Hairston), why would they not fill the 15th roster spot with the guy they felt was best equipped to help the team? I'm not sure of the DLeague implications but are either or both of them eligible to return to Austin? If not, then that adds to the stakes of the 15th slot decision.

    I'm not in the tank for either one, I'm just saying it seems to make sense to me to fill that 15th spot rather than leave it open.

  21. #21
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    1.5 million is a lot of money for a players that might simply not see the floor at all, IMHO.
    Plus if they get waived the Spurs could hire them later on during the season if the need arises (unless another team takes them first, which I would argue is unlikely given the current state of the economy. A gamble nonetheless).

  22. #22
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    1.5 million is a lot of money for a players that might simply not see the floor at all, IMHO.
    Plus if they get waived the Spurs could hire them later on during the season if the need arises (unless another team takes them first, which I would argue is unlikely given the current state of the economy. A gamble nonetheless).
    This is pretty much it. There is some risk that Hairston could wind up on another NBA team, but I would say that possibility is quite small. It's also possible that he goes to Europe for a year and then we don't see him again until Summer League.

    I want them to keep Malik, but I'll understand it if they don't.

    If they keep Marcus over Malik, I'll be scratching my head.

  23. #23
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    But isn't one or the other the same as one or none?
    Actually, no, it isn't. One or none allows for a 14 man roster as the end result. One or the other does not.

    It's really easy for us in the forum to say "it's only 1.5-1.6M", but that's actually a of a lot for a player that may get into 15-20 total games at garbage time. I'm not going to bag on Holt if he doesn't want to pay it. Caterpillar isn't doing too well this year. He stepped up big already in taking on the tax burden for this year.

  24. #24
    Straya AussieFanKurt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    8,065
    hurry up and give Hairston the place

  25. #25
    Reppin' Timmy's homeland. VI_Massive's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    960
    This is pretty much it. There is some risk that Hairston could wind up on another NBA team, but I would say that possibility is quite small. It's also possible that he goes to Europe for a year and then we don't see him again until Summer League.

    I want them to keep Malik, but I'll understand it if they don't.

    If they keep Marcus over Malik, I'll be scratching my head.
    I think you're right. I think Hairston is the more valuable commodity. Assuming that's the case, if there is little risk of losing Hairston to someone else, it makes sense to preserve an open 15th slot for whatever need may arise. If the need is for a Hairston-type player, we can sign him (assuming he's available). If we need someone else or want to swing some kind of trade that would fill our 15th slot, we retain that flexibility.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •