Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 64
  1. 10-25-2009 #26
    MannyIsGod
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Jesus how can you not find it?

    http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/

    On the left side of the page under Obama Approval Ratings on Oct 21.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote MannyIsGod is offline
  2. 10-25-2009 #27
    Viva Las Espuelas
    Orange Whip? Orange Whip? Viva Las Espuelas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Post Count
    19,497
    mmmm. mmmm.mmmmm
    barack hussein obama
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Viva Las Espuelas is offline
  3. 10-25-2009 #28
    ChumpDumper
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    mmmm. mmmm.mmmmm
    You're an idiot.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote ChumpDumper is offline
  4. 10-25-2009 #29
    MannyIsGod
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Out of those who voted for McCain - Obama maintains 10% approval rating. Those who voted for him of course he still maintains a 6% disapproval rating. We should call those the Darrins, btw. Among those who voted for someone else or "don't remember" his approval rating is 32%.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote MannyIsGod is offline
  5. 10-25-2009 #30
    hope4dopes
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    1,476
    Quote Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
    Ruh roh....


    October 24, 2009


    Obama Has Won Over More Than He's Lost

    Public Policy Polling notes President Obama's approval rating with people who didn't vote for him is 14% and his disapproval rating with people who voted for him is 6%.

    "So he's won over twice as many people as he's lost since he got elected. Who in the national media is going to write that story? Not bad for someone whose support is supposedly falling apart."
    Oh yeah manny,.... the people LOVE the LEADER that's why ron emmanuel, and obama are in smoke filled back rooms taking a rubber hose to congressional democrats to get on board and show a united front.
    Yeah for some reason the DNC doesn't share your rosy outlook for the future....and it's only going to get worse for them.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote hope4dopes is offline
  6. 10-25-2009 #31
    ChumpDumper
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    Quote Originally Posted by hope4dopes
    Oh yeah manny,.... the people LOVE the LEADER that's why ron emmanuel, and obama are in smoke filled back rooms taking a rubber hose to congressional democrats to get on board and show a united front.
    Yeah for some reason the DNC doesn't share your rosy outlook for the future....and it's only going to get worse for them.
    Quote Originally Posted by Winehole23
    micca goes straight to meltdown mode and free associates, almost 100% of the time.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote ChumpDumper is offline
  7. 10-25-2009 #32
    Wild Cobra
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Quote Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
    Jesus how can you not find it?

    http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/

    On the left side of the page under Obama Approval Ratings on Oct 21.
    OK, I was looking for a 10/24 poll, but 10/23 was the last date listed.

    Still, the poll has 49% voting for Obama, 42% voting for McCain and 9% other. The poll didn't limit itself to those who actually voted. Only 33% of the registered voters voted for Obama.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Wild Cobra is offline
  8. 10-25-2009 #33
    spursncowboys
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    19% <65?
    That's not accurate. Especially when BHO is trying to take their healthcare. Thats the largest voting bloc in elections.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote spursncowboys is offline
  9. 10-25-2009 #34
    RandomGuy
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Quote Originally Posted by Ignignokt
    What the?

    So the way the blog worded it was, Obama has a 14 percent approval rating amongst people who didn't vote for him, and 6 % amongst people who did?

    SO that brings his net approval rating at 20%! lol.

    ty poll.
    Your lack of both reading comprehension and ability to think logically is painful to watch.

    Please stop posting stupid things like this, my brain can't take the exposure to your brand of stupidity.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote RandomGuy is offline
  10. 10-25-2009 #35
    spursncowboys
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    PPP conducted a national survey of 766 registered voters from October 16th to 19th. The
    survey’s margin of error is +/-3.5%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and
    weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.
    How did it poll? If you look at the 2004 election map, by counties, Conservatives get their base from mostly small towns. Did they do a poll at a popular corner of a big city? Was it by phone?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote spursncowboys is offline
  11. 10-25-2009 #36
    MannyIsGod
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
    OK, I was looking for a 10/24 poll, but 10/23 was the last date listed.

    Still, the poll has 49% voting for Obama, 42% voting for McCain and 9% other. The poll didn't limit itself to those who actually voted. Only 33% of the registered voters voted for Obama.

    You seriously fail at looking at cross tabs. You continue down this path when I gave you the information you needed from the poll which was located in the cross tabs and you continue to use irrelevant information of how many registered voters voted for Obama.


    Here, I'll hold your hand

    http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/p...ional_1021.pdf

    Page 3. Top left corner.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote MannyIsGod is offline
  12. 10-25-2009 #37
    MannyIsGod
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Quote Originally Posted by spursncowboys
    How did it poll? If you look at the 2004 election map, by counties, Conservatives get their base from mostly small towns. Did they do a poll at a popular corner of a big city? Was it by phone?

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote MannyIsGod is offline
  13. 10-25-2009 #38
    MannyIsGod
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Quote Originally Posted by RandomGuy
    Your lack of both reading comprehension and ability to think logically is painful to watch.

    Please stop posting stupid things like this, my brain can't take the exposure to your brand of stupidity.
    He owned up to the self ownage which makes it fine imo. We're all allowed to make stupid mistakes.

    Whats funny is when people don't own up to when its obvious like WC.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote MannyIsGod is offline
  14. 10-25-2009 #39
    RandomGuy
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Quote Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
    He owned up to the self ownage which makes it fine imo. We're all allowed to make stupid mistakes.

    Whats funny is when people don't own up to when its obvious like WC.
    He did indeed. Almost makes me feel bad for my post.

    Almost.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote RandomGuy is offline
  15. 10-25-2009 #40
    spursncowboys
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    Quote Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
    Why is that funny?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote spursncowboys is offline
  16. 10-25-2009 #41
    Wild Cobra
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Quote Originally Posted by RandomGuy
    He did indeed. Almost makes me feel bad for my post.

    Almost.
    Stupid mistake? By not seeing the poll until pointed out it was an earlier date than the article by 3 days?

    Or do you mean by pointing out it didn't exclude those who didn't vote in the election? The PDF file has no question asking if they voted or not.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Wild Cobra is offline
  17. 10-25-2009 #42
    ChumpDumper
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    Quote Originally Posted by spursncowboys
    How did it poll? If you look at the 2004 election map, by counties, Conservatives get their base from mostly small towns. Did they do a poll at a popular corner of a big city? Was it by phone?
    If you're really curious, you would have looked it up by now.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote ChumpDumper is offline
  18. 10-25-2009 #43
    hope4dopes
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    1,476
    whine holes
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote hope4dopes is offline
  19. 10-25-2009 #44
    ChumpDumper
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    Quote Originally Posted by hope4dopes
    whine holes
    You certainly are.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote ChumpDumper is offline
  20. 10-25-2009 #45
    MannyIsGod
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
    Stupid mistake? By not seeing the poll until pointed out it was an earlier date than the article by 3 days?

    Or do you mean by pointing out it didn't exclude those who didn't vote in the election? The PDF file has no question asking if they voted or not.
    Actually it does. Reading it hard. I ing spoonfed you the info and you still can't get it. Not much else I can do. You can lead the clueless poster to the info but you can't make him drink.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote MannyIsGod is offline
  21. 10-25-2009 #46
    Ignignokt
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    Quote Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
    You certainly are.
    jealous?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Ignignokt is offline
  22. 10-25-2009 #47
    ChumpDumper
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Ignignokt
    jealous?
    There you go again.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote ChumpDumper is offline
  23. 10-25-2009 #48
    Wild Cobra
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Quote Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
    Actually it does. Reading it hard. I ing spoonfed you the info and you still can't get it. Not much else I can do. You can lead the clueless poster to the info but you can't make him drink.
    Well then please point out the paragraph I missed. Polling registered voters is not the same as polling those who voted. When only 9% answered they voted for someone else, or didn't remember, I see the fallacy I pointed out earlier. Since 23% of the registered voters didn't vote, shouldn't question #5 reflect that? Please show me where they narrowed down registered voters to voters who actually voted. I must be stupid enough that I need my hand held.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Wild Cobra is offline
  24. 10-25-2009 #49
    MannyIsGod
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
    Well then please point out the paragraph I missed. Polling registered voters is not the same as polling those who voted. When only 9% answered they voted for someone else, or didn't remember, I see the fallacy I pointed out earlier. Since 23% of the registered voters didn't vote, shouldn't question #5 reflect that? Please show me where they narrowed down registered voters to voters who actually voted. I must be stupid enough that I need my hand held.
    Ok. Then obviously the poll is completely ed and has nothing of value to be seen because it doesn't meet WC's arbitrary benchmark that no one else cares about. PPP is an extremely reputable polling agency and they conduct accurate polls but you feel the need to pick apart this just the way you tried to do with party identification in the other thread (which you're absolutely wrong on also).

    Its not even a big deal and all any of you have to say is "its one poll" because thats all it is but I find it absolutely telling how afraid you guys get and how quickly you rush to discredit it with bull . When your bull is refuted you move some goal posts and just keep the game going.

    Its insanely amusing watching you scramble for anything that will make things fit your point of view instead of taking an objective look at the situation.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote MannyIsGod is offline
  25. 10-25-2009 #50
    Wild Cobra
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Quote Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
    Ok. Then obviously the poll is completely ed and has nothing of value to be seen because it doesn't meet WC's arbitrary benchmark that no one else cares about. PPP is an extremely reputable polling agency and they conduct accurate polls but you feel the need to pick apart this just the way you tried to do with party identification in the other thread (which you're absolutely wrong on also).

    Its not even a big deal and all any of you have to say is "its one poll" because thats all it is but I find it absolutely telling how afraid you guys get and how quickly you rush to discredit it with bull . When your bull is refuted you move some goal posts and just keep the game going.

    Its insanely amusing watching you scramble for anything that will make things fit your point of view instead of taking an objective look at the situation.
    LOL...

    I'm only pointing out the flaws, and you go ape ...

    My God man, get a grip!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Wild Cobra is offline
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules