Why didn't he play in the preseason? Team docs and his doc cleared him to play... The FO and entire team was getting uneasy with him not even practicing... my point is that what I saw was him getting easy buckets with a lot of looks against a rookie that had never played a single NBA game before...
you're really showing off your critical thinking today.Ducking behind semantics.
By your definition, anyone who posts a topic and expects responses is trolling.
By your definition, trash talking between two fans and 'inciting' responses because two team are about to play eachother is trolling, as opposed to good old fashioned trash talking.
By my definition, you're ignorant.
sons, okafor beasted blair on a handful of plays. Blair was implementing the Bonner post-defense. God bless
During the telecast, the analysts mentioned that Scott wants the Hornets to play a more uptempo style, run more at given opportunities, rather than be the walk-it-up, setup, team they were last year. That sounds odd to me because Okafor is not the running big man that Chandler was. In other words, the style Scott wants to play this year is better suited to Chandler's game, while the style they played last year would've been more suited to Okafor's game. Am I the only one who was confused with that paradox?
On a message board? Yes, it's both. Don't try to wiggle out of it by pretending they're completely unrelated.
By anyone with half a mind's definition, you're trollable. No use denying it.
I am the opposite of trollable. It's a fact.
Second, I've been trolling you this whole thread. Fact.
Dancing like a puppet to BRHornet and Culburn's posts makes you trollable. Fact.
LOL why are you so offended by me not being trollable? Some are born with the gift, some aren't. You obviously, were not.
because you're being a dumbass hater for some unknown reason, even responding to supposed trolls makes me trollable, apparently.
Wow, great logic there. As great as saying only trolls post topics and expect responses. Or saying trash talking between fans on a message board when their two respective teams play is 'trolling.'
at you ducking the fact that the Non-Spurfan posters in the NBA Forum pretty much have you dangling on a string.
tee, hee.
I have you dangling on a string.
tee, hee.
BTW, since I'm the opposite of trollable, its impossible for NBA forumers to have me 'dangling', even when I'm tiptoeing through the tulips tee hee.
at you putting words in my mouth and trying to twist what I said.
I'm a dumbass hater now? Better than a poster who jumps at any post uncomplimentary of the Spurs, yet still considers himself not trollable.
So you're reduced to going on tangents and parroting what I said, now?
Yeah, since only trolls do that, right?
that's still trolling.I'm pretty sure it was all in good fun,
And trolling the poster who made the original troll post is still responding.The failure continues.lmao at you putting words in my mouth
Whether or not the responses were in his original thread or in this one, you still accept to the bait by encouraging them.
I can't make it any clearer.
You have been trolled by me this whole thread. Hope you enjoyed.So you're reduced to going on tangents and parroting what I said, now?
yea I have heard that too. really not sure man wtf they are thinking with that.
yo dumbass anakha, br is actually discussing his team in his supposed troll thread and defending them from people who *gasp* are calling him out for being so y.
You just don't get it.
Yeah, since only trolls do that, right?
The failure continues.
I can't make it any clearer.
If you're going to cherry-pick my posts, do it right.
As per the link I posted, the definition is: Posting derogatory messages about sensitive subjects on newsgroups and chat rooms to bait users into responding.
So yes, BR trolled. And you attempting to wiggle your way out of it by claiming that anybody who posts is then a troll conveniently forgets the definition I posted, which I notice you never referenced. Ignorant, much?
And by trolling (or by your definition, 'trash-talking') him, however you may describe it, you still responded directly to what he posted. Which makes you trollable.
Sure, you might be trolling me now. When have I claimed I wasn't trollable? Only you were. And your sad history of asking 'how high?' when posters like BR and Culburn say 'Jump' proves you utterly wrong.
You moron.
His discussing his team now doesn't make his original post in the other thread any less of a troll post. Regardless of his motivations, the post itself was inflammatory and designed to incite responses.
son calm the down. enough of this nonsense just chill out ...
You moron.
His discussing his team now doesn't make his original post in the other thread any less of a troll post. Regardless of his motivations, the post itself was inflammatory and designed to incite responses.
I made the original thread like I always have in the past whenever the Spurs play the Hornets. it stirs up friendly smack talk and normally I am out numbered like 60 to 1 to begin with ... but of course it never fails there is always one or two dumbasses who get so worked up over a post and they take it too far.
I'm cool with it. I know you normally do this stuff and was amused by z0sa rising to the bait while calling himself non-trollable.
Watching him twist and squirm to justify himself is the most amusing part of all this.
son lets all be friends.
Your holier than thou at ude is on constant display, y, but I didn't expect such a royal undertaking after the Spurs just beat some ass. Pathetic really
If you're going to cherry-pick my posts, do it right.
Would you consider the Hornets playing the Spurs to be a sensitive subject?As per the link I posted, the definition is: Posting derogatory messages about sensitive subjects on newsgroups and chat rooms to bait users into responding.
No, he didn't. And even using your definition to say he did, I never even responded in that thread til ing late and only to laugh at the Hornets, stupid.So yes, BR trolled.
I didn't reference it because *gasp* it doesn't have any meaning here except to you. Ignorant, much?And you attempting to wiggle your way out of it by claiming that anybody who posts is then a troll conveniently forgets the definition I posted, which I notice you never referenced.
Where did I say trolling is the same as trash talking?And by trolling (or by your definition, 'trash-talking') him,
Where did I respond directly to what he posted?however you may describe it, you still responded directly to what he posted. Which makes you trollable.
Yep.Sure, you might be trolling me now.
Where have you? I was meaning to ask why you have a quote from me, from weeks ago, when I have never entertained a conversation with you or even paid much attention to you, attacked you, anything. You're some no name with no life stalking me, apparently.When have I claimed I wasn't trollable?
If you can find one post from the NBA forum, ever, where I was directly trolled by BR, I will gladly admit defeat. (it's never happened)Only you were. And your sad history of asking 'how high?' when posters like BR and Culburn say 'Jump' proves you utterly wrong.
Culburn trolls everyone, even the opposites of trollable like myself. Not that I was trolled, he just tries very hard.
SON calm the down
Where did I rise to the bait? Quote specific posts and demonstrate how it was me "rising to the bait"
he just can't understand that you trying to raise up friendly smack talk is not the ing same as trolling. apparently this kid has no friends with different favorite teams or players. Maybe he just has no life, because you can't be this ignorant
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote