Reply With Quote
Curious as to why you would say the refs are bad...
LoL stretch, man who took his handle name from his mom's stripper nickname.
Curious as to why you would say the refs are bad...
This game is not about bad refereeing...you wanna say they should have reviewed that fumble? That's fine...we got the ing ball back after the fumble, and picked it up past the first down marker...so we would have had the first down, instead of 2nd and 2. And you want to call the other fumble a fumble? Bull ..the whistle had blown the play dead and he was already being brought backwards..it's called forward progress...wake up.
I agree with gtownspur. One thing CBF is not is a homer. Well, a Duncan homer, but nothing else.
That non-review on the Kirkendoll fumble was total bull . It was a clear obvious fumble that they did not review. Gundy even called a timeout and no review was made. It was bogus, and that is the reason lesser big12 teams talk about UT constantly. I really wish that had not happened. But oh well. I do acknowledge the bull though.
I'm not sure which one was the Kirkendoll fumble..I remember two controversial ones..one was the one where he just took it away from the guy, and that one was blown dead before it happened..I remember hearing the whistle. The other one, we got the ball back anyway, so it wouldn't have mattered.
Irrelevant in a beatdown, although I didn't see the play
You can borrow some SEC officials next week if you'd like
And other teams in the big 12 talk about UT cuz they're jealous, and lesser
There was two fumbles...neither was reviewed...one of them wouldn't have mattered because Texas got the ball back anyway, and actually got two yards out of the fumble. The other one, about 5 Cowboys had him wrapped up, and forward progress had been called, and was being pushed back. The whistle had been blown, and then he fumbled.
The goodwin review was not a fumble.
The Kirk one was sometime in the 3rd Q. We were close to the OSU endzone and we passed it short ball to Kirk, he struggled, was being tackled by two people, would not go down, then a third came in, the ball popped out, and he went down. There was no review, the announcers were like whawhawhaaaattt, then gundy calls a timeout, still no review, then we go downfield and end up scoring a TD that drive.
It was BS, i fully admit it.
No..that's the one I'm talking about...the ball was blown dead. Whistle was blown because of forward progress...that's why it wasn't reviewed.
Forward progress wasn't called until after the fumble occured. That was shady. It should've been reviewed.
I disagree...I heard a whistle blow...could be wrong, but I'm standing by that..
Naw holmes I could be wrong too but i specifically remember the whistle and ref jumping in after the ball had popped out.
Haven't looked at it again, it's DVR'd so I will give it a look again.
But I remember freaking out because that fumble would have been H U G E.
yeah..like I said, I could have been wrong...but I know for sure forward progress had been stopped, so if the refs hadn't blown the whistle, they should have.
conference officials really shouldn't exist.
This.
If the NCAA had full time refs under their employ instead of having the conferences handle it....things would be better.
A couple bad calls that goes Texas' way in a blowout win doesn't even compare to the nonstop bad calls that go Florida's way in close games.
Oklahoma State got a mild prostate exam of a raping.
Meanwhile, Arkansas got raped by the dildo from Seven.
no comparison between the two.
your metaphors are phenomenal..
yeah it was a fumble
oh well. 1 call. like mono said, doesnt compare to the multiple weekly calls that florida gets
we take what we can get.
What?
That's idiotic.. if i remember correctly. THat fumble would have set up OKie st. for a touchdown inside the 20, with only two scores to make up. Plus Okie st needed that momentum because they had more yds, and T.O.P than UT.
THat play was a momentum killer and would have given okie st a great chance to pull the upset.
OU/UT/TCU/SMU/UNT/Rangers/Cowboys/Stars/Michael Phelps/Dallas Burn/Mavs/Whatever it doesn't matter. less Mavfan will always have some team to root for whenever he's with his New Era single color baseball cap wearing scrote posse at the local Buffalo Wild Wings.
With so many mediocre teams to follow.. when it comes to sports, Mavfan is the jack of all trades and master of none.
To me there were two horrible calls that went against okie st and none that I can think if that went against Texas. The 15 yrd unneccesary roughness call where the db threw his shoulder and not his head on Buckner I believe was bs. Looked like a clean hit. The 2nd was the fumble everyone here was already talking about - maybe it should have been blown dead but it wasn't and it was borderline whether it should be anyway. In a 41-14 raping though it might make the margins closer but Texas D owned Robinson and were way in his head. Doubt he has enough to get pts even with those two calls. Oh well, I'll take it.
So you're telling me the way Zac Robinson was playing that he would have definitely scored a TD there? Your assumption shows you're more re ed than any of the refs out there that night.
You remember incorrectly..it was close to the end of the first half...it was not inside the 20, but yes..it was two scores to make up. They did not have more yards at that time, Texas did, because Texas started the drive and the yards were exactly even. And it still didn't matter, because whether or not the whistle was blown, forward progress had stopped. So if they did call it a fumble, Texas would have been screwed over by the referees because they didn't blow the whistle. And if you really think Oklahoma State was winning that game, after what happened to UT last year against Tech on that same night...wow...just wow. Texas' D was in Zac's head from the beginning of that game.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
