Reply With Quote
LOL@ this thread
Why do you let the mavs bother you anyway? it's all they got, why not let them have their bottle?FIXED
Sad, sad soul. WHO GIVES A FAT ABOUT 2000-2007. JUST BEND OVER AND CONTINUE TO LET THE HORNETS POUND YOU "UP 2 LOSE 4 AND BLAME THE REFS" GOTS IN THE ASS. WE HAVE WON, WHAT, LIKE 11 OF THE LAST 14 VS. THE #1 SEED UPSET BY THE #8 SEED.
CP3 OWNS YOU AND YOUR PATHETIC CHOKING TEAM.
LOL@ this thread
WHY ARE YOU SHOUTING? ONLY 14 YEAR OLD GIRLS, CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ON EZ MACHINES THAT THEY BOUGHT FROM WAL-MART TYPE IN ALL CAPS.
It's 10 out of the last 14. You can own us all you want. Just like the Warriors own us. Doesn't matter since 121-63 is a one-man team and isn't anything more than first-round fodder for the likes of the Lakers, Spurs and Nuggets.
B/C THEY GIVE HORNETS' FANS MORE ABOUT 121-63 THAN ANYONE, AND IT'S IRONIC SEEING AS WE OWN THEM MORE THAN ANY OTHER TEAM. IT'S LIKE ME BASHING THE JAZZ ABOUT SOMETHING ANOTHER TEAM DID TO THEM WHILE THEY CONTINUE TO OWN US.
I can't wait till 2013 when Chris Paul is wearing a green and gold Seattle SuperSonics jersey.
Hey, Stephen A. Smith is a 121-63 fan. Props on the win the other night when we blew all those free throws. I know that's a big milestone in franchise history for 121-63.B/C THEY GIVE HORNETS' FANS MORE ABOUT 121-63 THAN ANYONE, AND IT'S IRONIC SEEING AS WE OWN THEM MORE THAN ANY OTHER TEAM. IT'S LIKE ME BASHING THE JAZZ ABOUT SOMETHING ANOTHER TEAM DID TO THEM WHILE THEY CONTINUE TO OWN US.
Would you say the pinnacle of 121-63's history is losing to the Spurs in the second round on your home court in Game 7? That must have been an exciting season for you guys.
my caps lock is ed up. im happy it bothers you though. our one-man team owns your "complete team" and we always will. btw, mavs aren't going to get anywhere near the 2nd round this year. they are going to lose in the 1st round, just like we will. mavs are a 1st round fodder as well dude. maybe this year, you will actually have to face a healthy team in the 1st round. do you honestly think the mavs will do in the postseason? no, they won't, and if we are fortunate enough to draw the mavs in the 1st round, we will win in 6 games or less, easily.
almost as exciting as losing the finals in 6 games after being up 2, to the worst team to ever win an nba le. or being the only #1 seed to lose to an 8 seed in a 7 game series(didn't even make it to that 7th game, eh). or november 4, 2009.its funny how you talk like the mavs have done better. they know better than anyone that having the best regular season record doesn't even land you in the 2nd round.
Okay, Stephen A.my caps lock is ed up.
Just like the Mavs were going to "always" own 121-63 after beating them 21 straight times? Listen son, these things go in cycles. I know you've only been a 121-63 fan since May of 2008, but sometimes you eat the bar and sometimes the bar eats you. The worm will turn again at some point.our one-man team owns your "complete team" and we always will.
We'll find out one way or another in April.btw, mavs aren't going to get anywhere near the 2nd round this year.
I have no idea. It's November. There will be trades and February buyouts. I know that you've never followed a team from training camp to 2nd-round exit before, but rosters are fluid and there are also things called injuries. It's impossible to predict what will happen in April and May at this point. Nobody predicting the Lakers to make a Finals before they traded for Gasol. Nobody could've seen Dirk getting hurt and them losing to an 8-seed as a result. Or Garnett getting hurt and the Celtics failing to return to the Finals. When you've followed basketball for more than 2 months, you figure these things out for yourself.do you honestly think the mavs will do in the postseason?
The 4th seed doesn't meet the 7th or 8th seed in the first round. You guys will most likely end up playing the Lakers or Spurs.if we are fortunate enough to draw the mavs in the 1st round, we will win in 6 games or less, easily.
It's not like the Mavs would have been the best team to ever win an NBA le. I still can't quite understand what's so unbelievable about a team that had a top 3 player in the NBA, Shaq as his sidekick, a supporting cast that included 2 future HoFers + one of the most clutch 3 point shooters in the NBA, all the while being coached by Pat Riley, winning a championship. Maybe the Mavs choked, but Miami was pretty good.
Miami wasn't as good as you are making them sound. Wade was a one-man team that year. shaq was pretty much non-existant, antoine walker was half-decent, as was Po-Z and Zo. I think they were a weak team for an NBA champion. Miami was was easily the weakest team to win a le this decade.
The furthest 121-63 has ever made it in the playoffs is the semifinals. You must have been really excited to see them make it so far in 2008. I bet it was exciting. Props on that .
The Mavs were not in existence in 1978. Dallas was granted an NBA franchise and began play in 1980. The worst team to ever win a le was the 1977-78 Washington Bullets, who finished 44-38 with a point differential of 0.9. The Mavs lost the 2006 NBA Finals to the Miami Heat, which went 52-30 in the regular season, had a point differential of 4.2, beat the #1 seed Detroit Pistons (65-17) in 6 games, and were led by Dwyane Wade, who is universally acknowledged as one of the top 3 players in the league.to the worst team to ever win an nba le.
Yep. Our best player was hurt. No excuses though, Golden State just played better.or being the only #1 seed to lose to an 8 seed in a 7 game series(didn't even make it to that 7th game, eh).
I gotta give 121-63 props for an early-season win in November, you're right about that.or november 4, 2009.
Well they have. The Mavericks advanced to the Conference Finals in 1988, where they lost to the Showtime Lakers in 7 games. They advanced to the Conference Finals again in 2003, where they lost to the eventual champion Spurs in 6 games after Dirk dislocated his knee in Game 3. They also advanced to the NBA Finals in 2006, where they lost to the Heat in 6 after winning the first two games.its funny how you talk like the mavs have done better.
121-63 has advanced to the Semifinals on 5 separate occasions:
- 1993, when they lost to the Knicks
- 1998, when they lost to the Bulls
- 2001, when they lost to the Bucks
- 2002, when they lost to the Nets
- 2008, when they lost to the Spurs
Last edited by Findog; 11-06-2009 at 04:41 PM.
Mavs should've won that series, but they lost to a team with a HOF coach, a dominant center, an elite perimeter scorer, and a supporting cast of veteran role players that complemented their stars very well. Where did we see that before? Oh yeah, that's the same formula the Lakers used from 99-01. The Heat weren't as good as the Shaq/Kobe Lakers, but they modeled their team after them.
Miami went 52-30, had a point differential of 4.2, had one of the top 3 players in the league, Shaq was still a 20/10 force, Pat Riley was their head coach, and they had a supporting cast of veteran role players with lots of playoff experience. They beat two 60-win teams en route to the le. That's pretty impressive.
again, you are saying that you are already going to be the 4 seed and we will be the 7 or 8 seed right after saying that you never know at this time of the year what will happen(which is true). you contradict yourself too often to be taken seriously.
I'd take the Heat over the 2004 Pistons.
at mavs' fans validating their excuses while ignoring those of everyone else, (and actually believing that they are always right)
And Shaq was non-existent in the finals cause of all the double teams Avery was throwing at him. His stats weren't good but he opened up the floor for the rest of the team in that series.
What excuses? If you had reading comprehension skills, you'd see that I was giving Miami credit for winning that series. You need to learn how to read.
Hornets1. You little you. Jordan/Bulls fan and now you're a Saints/Colts fan.
Here's my question, who was better? The 04 Kobe-Shaq Lakers or the 06 Wade-Shaq heat?
The way Kobe was playing in 2004, undoubtedly the 2006 Wade-Shaq Heat.
I said the 4th seed won't play the 7th or 8th seed. The 4th seed will play the 5th seed. The 7th seed plays the 2nd seed. The 8th seed plays the 1st seed. It's best of 7 with a 2-2-1-1-1 format.
You do realize that the Hornets are not the best team in the league, right? You have the Lakers, Celtics, Magic, Spurs and Nuggets to choose from.been a season-ticket holder since they moved to nola. was a jordan/bulls fan before that.
stfu got. who am i supposed to cheer for when there is no hometown team? i loved watching jordan and the bulls from 87-98. i'm a saintss fan b/c i'm from nola, and i'm a colts fan b/c my aunt is a good friend of the mannings and i've gotten to meet peyton at least 10 times. u mad b/c my favorite football teams are a combined 14 or 15-0. suck it got.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions