Posting an article doesn't mean he voiced his oppinion on it, and he turned this whole thread into micca.
Posting an article doesn't mean he voiced his oppinion on it, and he turned this whole thread into micca.
You started a whole thread to turn it into me. My screen name is in the le.
And since when is an opinion required on every subject here?
Is that part of an oath I was required to rap when I joined the forum?
Yeah i did, But it wasn't about you personally , it was a thread asking your specific oppinion. I must have missed where clambake did that to micca in this thread.
When you claimed to have voiced one and didn't.And since when is an opinion required on every subject here?
We were only talking about journalist and News Networks being bound to that , and voicing your oppinion is against one of those rules in that oath. So unless you're a journalist, which you haven't disclosed that to me, or unless i said we were bound by those points to join this forum, then you can take this whole conversation to chumpdumper strawman levels never been reached before.Is that part of an oath I was required to rap when I joined the forum?
this is a bad day for G.
I believe many threads are started with a poster in mind, stated or not. You want to force people to be explicit about that all the time?
Really? Required?When you claimed to have voiced one and didn't.
Expect they aren't bound by that.We were only talking about journalist and News Networks being bound to that , and voicing your oppinion is against one of those rules in that oath.No I said nothing about my rapping a journalist oath.So unless you're a journalist, which you haven't disclosed that to me, or unless i said we were bound by those points to join this forum, then you can take this whole conversation to chumpdumper strawman levels never been reached before.
I was asking if there was an oath for the forum that I was required to rap and follow in order to be able to post here. You appointed yourself the arbiter of what is required in the forum, so you are the one to ask.
Let me know if there is a forum oath rap for us to take.
This is sure to be a highly effective jihad recruiting tool, proving to the jihadists that US is making religious war on Muslims.
I rather doubt they would have done something this bold without some really good evidence.
No .
The believers of secularism love to destroy God's house.
It's interesting to see folks defend someone like David Koresh for purely partisan reasons. I think he was an dangerous, evil nutjob and would think the same if the feds raided his place under the Bush administration.
Well done again.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)