Reply With Quote
According to Chump.
Lying about ones achievement is worse than Lying and slandering somebody's character.
So it's a Moyeratic Oath.
Which no one actually takes.
According to Chump.
Lying about ones achievement is worse than Lying and slandering somebody's character.
I guess you didn't see that video of the J school students of columbia who took the oath while reciting a rap song about journalism.So it's a Moyeratic Oath.
Which no one actually takes.
And Bill Moyers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chumpdumper.
The Moyeratic rap oath?
You are damn entertaining today.
You can make fun of Bill Moyers or the way journalism students used a creative way to present journalistic principles while having fun all you want.The Moyeratic rap oath?
You are damn entertaining today.
That's not the point here.
The point is you're dishonest by saying lying about an accomplishment is worse than lying, misrepresentation, and slander.
You can thank me for keeping this on topic.
that's old news.
I will make fun of it, because there is no evidence anyone involved is bound by any such oath because some students rapped it.
An accomplishment?The point is you're dishonest by saying lying about an accomplishment is worse than lying, misrepresentation, and slander.
Whose accomplishement?
I really think they are equally reprehensible. I just thought more effort was put into the Fox deception. Tape libraries and such.You can thank me for keeping this on topic.
Tell me who was slandered by msnbc. Were they sued?
Contradiction in there eh?
You're such a liar. You earlier excused MSNBC's act.
And MSNBC slandered everyone at the rally by accusing them of inciting racial hatred.
Whose accomplishment? Mic e Balkman's rally of which Hannity claims credit and promoted, if you don't even know the background of the whole story why even argue. You're pitiful, comeback once you have actually seen both footages of MSNBC's and FOX's so you could have a proper context.
I've seen both.
Did you see anyone from either program rapping they Moyeratic oath?
No, I didn't. I just said that Fox's required more effort.
If that is your definition, you earlier excused Fox and continue to do so. Please contradict yourself in defense of that.
So they sued, right?And MSNBC slandered everyone at the rally by accusing them of inciting racial hatred.
It's such a clear-cut case, right?
I saw both programs violating them. ANd no i don't believe there's a formal version that one is required to take like doctors. Nevertheless, the point of the oath which Moyer insisted are points that are taught in journalism. So whether they existed or not, they are thing for which journalist should be held accountable in which they cover in journalism.
Journalists are required by gtown to adhere to something that may or may not exist and they may or may not rap.
silly chump. So if a girl gets raped and she didn't bring forth charges, there was no rape.
Way to go, rapist!
Journalists are required by gtown to adhere to something that may or may not exist.
Journalism school does exist.
Ok, who has standing in this case an on what grounds could they sue?
Way to go, rapist!
But do required rap oaths?
non required ones do. Your favorite Network can sleep better now.
As can yours.
I'm no judge, nor lawyer.
I didn't know we had to be lawyers to join this forum.
So you can't say with any certainty that slander actually occurred.
So people actually do watch MSNBC, as you've admitted it is your favorite channel.
? College football forum.
To be honest, I re-read my post and realized it was a (very small) practice in stating the readily obvious.
Total waste of (little) time.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
