You don't have to read their books or watch them on TV. I know I won't.
Please. Even CrooksShanks isn't stupid or gullible enough to buy that book.
You don't have to read their books or watch them on TV. I know I won't.
Did Prejean weasle out of completely expected questions of did Larry King ambush her with questions he promised she would not be asked?
I won't either. But when they melt-down and it comes to my attention, I'll mock the out of them for their stupidity and hypocrisy. Do you really think anybody cares about Carrie Prejean as a public figure? Or that this is about her celebrity status? That she's anything but a microcosm?
lol, this is nothing but a blatant example of why conservatives are so full of .
You'll read anything others post about her here and then bump the thread ten times to prove how much you don't care.
I didn't realize she had written a book. That was quite quick.
That was my response. Maybe I need to write a book, it seems in vogue right now
You're right on that - I don't plan on buying it or reading it. But here's my summary of the woman herself:
She should've never been asked such a politically charged question at a beauty pageant, especially by a person who is a militant sexual. She gave her opinion (which is the same as Obama's), and then has been villified and criticized ever since. She would've never had any problems with the Miss California Pageant people if not for that question. It's a well-known fact that these beauty pageants are run by gay men - and they took offense at her answer and decided to punish her for it.
Maybe she didn't handle things as well as she could have - but she is still pretty young and was totally unprepared for the backlash. I admire her for stating her beliefs and not backing down in the face of all the criticism and persecution. The video tape is an unfortunate development, but she's apologized for it and I think it may serve as a good teaching tool for other young women.
She probably would've been better served if she'd just stayed out of the spotlight for awhile - she's a lightening rod right now, and it's not doing her or her cause any good. I wish her well and I hope this whole experience will serve to change the way beauty pageants are run.
And Perez Hilton should just shut up and go away. Is there anyone who really likes him? He's loud, ugly and annoying.
Her cause (money and fame) is being very well served by her continually being an idiot in the spotlight.
good point. i was wondering if she used any tools.
CrookshanksAnd there you have it:She should've never been asked such a politically charged question at a beauty pageant, especially by a person who is a militant sexual. She gave her opinion (which is the same as Obama's), and then has been villified and criticized ever since. She would've never had any problems with the Miss California Pageant people if not for that question. It's a well-known fact that these beauty pageants are run by gay men - and they took offense at her answer and decided to punish her for it.
Yep. Notice none of them go after the boifriend. (Well they probably do "go after" him) but not to diss him for revealing such a personal video.
Ditto the Hollywood media. Not a word on Judas the boifriend.
nominee for ironic post of the year.
She's the one trying to sell herself as a political story.
One consistency about conservative/Repug/"Christian" wimmen, they're all ing stupid.
Take some Ridalin or get some more batteries for your Nintentdo DS and/or vibrator. Jeeez.
I would pay to see a one-on-one debate between ANY of the libs on this forum and Ann Coulter - she'd shread them without using any notes or reference materials.
How much would you pay?
I'm not really a lib per se, but if I debated her, can I use notes and reference materials?
This is sig worthy.
or spellcheck.
Crookshanks would shread you in a spelling bee without using any notes or reference materials.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)