Chump stated he is for removing the phrase altogether.
After all, it was tradition.
Sorry, gtown.
You already know, since you agree with her and whott.
Chump stated he is for removing the phrase altogether.
After all, it was tradition.
Sorry, gtown.
Tell me what it is, and your definition too.
I did ask for that as well.
So he does?
Well, let chump log back on under his own moniker, because you've been on the same page with whott throughout this time.
Don't rob Chump of his iden y.
I think you have proved you can't read.
Now quit stalling and tell me your definition of tradition and Palin's.
IRONY!!!!!!!x1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000
Yes, I am showing the irony of your not answering questions.
What is your definition of traditionalism and Palin's?
I don't know yet. Haven't looked anything up, or read past the article.
I do find it real disturbing that you are willing to post an article about about an article. Did you bother checking to find if the allegation is even true?
Even if she actually said that, and as implied, what makes a person like you so stupid to think people of the same party all agree with each other?
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 11-13-2009 at 04:45 PM.
I checked.
It's true.
Even funnier per Fox News: In 2007, the Democrat controlled Congress changed the location of the phrase on the dollar coins back to the face.
Does that return to tradition by Democrats calm her claims of disturbance?
thank god the democrats are trying to preserve this tradition.
I don't think the new tradition had a fair 140-year shake.
Did the other networks get scooped by Fox on this greatest of news stories? Seems like the other networks would be chomping at the bit to get another dagger in her.
Who can tell? Nobody watches them.
So just because the decision was made during the time of the Bush Administration, it makes her question stupid? All she did was ask "who makes a decision like that?" So who actually did make the decision?
And evidently it wasn't a very popular decision, because it was reversed last year. So why in the world do we have 3 pages of arguing about this? Of course, since Chump is one of the main posters in this thread, it's going to be long because all he ever does is ASK questions.
yeah, well, war will make you do crazy .
So basically, Bush was acting like a liberal the Democrats were acting like conservatives, Sarah Palin was acting like a conservative, which she claims to be, and all the Democrats in this thread agree with Bush?
Got it.
Nice job Sarah. And props to you for being what you appear to be, unlike Bush and the Democrats(in congress and in this thread).
you didn't get it.
Congress. It's so easy to find out I think even you could do it.
There have been plenty of declarative statements by me in this thread.And evidently it wasn't a very popular decision, because it was reversed last year. So why in the world do we have 3 pages of arguing about this? Of course, since Chump is one of the main posters in this thread, it's going to be long because all he ever does is ASK questions.
Oh I get it alright, you guys call her stupid when your own congress agrees with her.
Yes, she appears to be quite an idiot from that speech excerpt.
no, you see, we don't give a about the coin or the phrase.
I call her stupid because she didn't know it had been changed again.
I call her stupid because she didn't know that Congress makes those decisions.
I call her stupid because she thinks "internets chain email" is a speechwriter.
Bob Woodward should write a book about this. That is, if he's not already too busy wrighting a tell-all book on the deep political thoughts of Carrie Prejean.
so, her book doesn't include all that?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)