Which makes you pretty stupid to be in a thread discussing it.
Well, we know someone who has time to be the arbiter of what is important on a message board certainly isn't busy.
Which makes you pretty stupid to be in a thread discussing it.
this thread is about her stupidity.
you'd have to be pretty stupid not to know that.
I don't really get that from it, I think she was talking about the intent to move it to the side or remove it...people that want to do like that.
I see nothing to indicate, I think she was clearly asking what kind of people want that.I call her stupid because she didn't know that Congress makes those decisions.
Link?I call her stupid because she thinks "internets chain email" is a speechwriter.
No, I think it's clearly about yours.(in th collective sense)
Oh well hey, we don't all get to spend 25 hours a day on the Spurs talk political forum educating ourselves.you'd have to be pretty stupid not to know that.
Of course you really didn't get that.
Of course you think that.I see nothing to indicate, I think she was clearly asking what kind of people want that.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/dollarcoin.aspLink?
I fully expect you to "not get it" from that link and try to emphasize that Palin was more accurate than the email in stating what happened to the phrase on the coin.
Someone posted on YOUTUBE the audio of what she really said. Sounds like her recounting a story from years back, considering the side imprint only had a short life due to mis-strikes.
I would like to know the context before and after. It might be a story of what lead her into higher politics. To have more political input against things she disagrees with.
Of course I do.
And I fully expect you to show me the part where she thinks that internet chainmail is a speechwriter.I fully expect you to "not get it" from that link and try to emphasize that Palin was more accurate than the email in stating what happened to the phrase on the coin.
Near as I can tell Palin's name isn't mentioned anywhere on the link you provided and neither is the word(s) speech writer or any variation thereof. Much less any sort of quote by her saying she thinks it is one.
Your mind can't accept any possibility other than the one where your imaginary girlfriend is the smartest bestest imaginary girfriend ever.
Her parroting the subject of an internets chain mail is proof enough she used it or something very similar as her source.And I fully expect you to show me the part where she thinks that internet chainmail is a speechwriter.
Where else did you think she got it? An actual friend showing her shiny coins? What kind of people talk about and listen to and repeat such discussion about shiny coins?
Are you that kind of person?
Of course her name wouldn't be in it; it's the source of her speech. It's recycled faux outrage from several years ago. She knows it will still play with the ignorant and lovelorn.Near as I can tell Palin's name isn't mentioned anywhere on the link you provided and neither is the word(s) speech writer or any variation thereof. Much less any sort of quote by her saying she thinks it is one.
Mission accomplished.
What gets me is the attempt of lib s to try to frame this as a conspiracy that Palin believes in. No such evidence.
However, the dollars now have the phrase of the front again because of the difficulties in stamping them without the phrase. hundreds, if not thousands or millions, actually went into circulation without "In God We Trust!" A simple mis-striking of the coin, not intentional. Now with that in mind, it's easy to see why people might think conspiracy.
Now, anyone who spots one of these, hold on to it. It is a collectors item! It will be worth serious money at some time, if not already.
I never said she was the smarters.
Oh well , I'll start worrying when she starts sounding like a bumpersticker. Right now I'd say that just makes her well read compared to the average lib, at least on this forum.Her parroting the subject of an internets chain mail is proof enough she used it or something very similar as her source.
And I still don't see any indication she think it's a speech writer. Probably never will.
Governors?Where else did you think she got it? An actual friend showing her shiny coins?
What kind of people talk about and listen to and repeat such discussion about shiny coins?
Actually I am, and so are you.Are you that kind of person?
Apology accepted.Of course her name wouldn't be in it; it's the source of her speech. It's recycled faux outrage from several years ago.
I'll let you tidy that up a bit.
Pussy.
Liberals just keep showing us who you don't want to run against.
i fully intend to vote for her at the primaries.
then again, do i hate america?
You got me there. You never said she was "the smarters" -- brava.
Of course you'd say that.Oh well , I'll start worrying when she starts sounding like a bumpersticker. Right now I'd say that just makes her well read compared to the average lib, at least on this forum.
It certainly contributed mightily to that speech.And I still don't see any indication she think it's a speech writer. Probably never will.
She's not a governor, and I doubt other governors sat around talking about the shiny coins they just got.Governors?
I never heard anyone discuss this in my life. I heard Palin's description about one.Actually I am, and so are you.
Apology never given. Internets chain email wrote that part for the speech.Apology accepted.
I got tired of waiting for you to correct the "the smarters" thing, so I went out to eat.
Um...correct the smarters thing? Why I would I need to do that? You know what word was intended to go there, at least I think you do. So what then is the point in my putting out the effort to do so? Totally wasted effort. I hardly ever correct my minor typos, and if anyone should know that it's you.
I edit my posts to add thoughts and make sure the quote boxes line up and even on occassion correct a totally ed up word or sentence(as in you cannot understand it at all) and for no other reason.
I'm more concerned with the overall essence of points than I am impressing my teacher. In fact I actually consider typos to increase the artistic value of message board posts. They add a certain ambience or quality that sets them apart from cookie cutter posts.
Additionally, there are plenty of totally ing stupid people that don't make typos and have a great grammar skills and actually think those indicate intelligence and a can be used in place of a challenging or logical argument. Which is not true.
Besides, anyone stupid enough to not understand what happened there, I want them to call me out you see. For a variety of reasons.
If you actually need me to put the right word there, that actually says a lot more about you than it does me.
It's not the only typo in that post either...and I expect there are some in this one as well.
I don't see what Whott's complaining about. Chumpdumper already agrees with Whott and Sarah Palin, he just demands proper grammar and spelling, since he was voted #1 subs ute teacher of the year.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)