Reply With Quote
Well, yeah. 3x against them. How do you think SD has padded their record to this point?
That Glazer report isn't true. Vic Lombardi said Orton was walking around in dress shoes after the game, looking alright. As tightlipped as the Broncos have been with some of their injuries so far this season, how would Glazer come to find something like this? He's reading into Simms' and McDaniels' quotes about preparing for next week.That phrase under your username is very ironic.
Jay Glazer just reported that Kyle Orton will miss next week's game against SD.
Eh I didn't think we had a chance with him, but now the game will probably be over before the half.
Well, yeah. 3x against them. How do you think SD has padded their record to this point?
Ahahahahaha...suuuuuuuuure you have.
I figured it would only be a matter of time before the Chargers will catch & eventually surpass the Broncos. Chargers, despite lack of running game, so-so D, are still have a better team than the Broncos.
I like the Broncos but I didn't necessarily buy into the hype after the 6-0 start.
I like the Chargers on the road next week. They're due for a loss but it may not be this game. Chargers appear to be peaking at the right time.
BTW, congrats to LT-just learned that he too will be a Dad in 2010!
I bought into it and now I'm just heartbroken and pissed off. The Broncos weren't as good as their record but they're still my team. Here's to hoping for another win against the Chargers. We ing need it.
You're always as good as your record in the NFL.I bought into it and now I'm just heartbroken and pissed off. The Broncos weren't as good as their record but they're still my team. Here's to hoping for another win against the Chargers. We ing need it.
I'm not going to argue with a fellow homer.
I never for one minute believed the Denver hype....not one bit.
lol broncos
lol baby belicheat
Oh, well, hey everyone - some guy named "LOL Texans" didn't believe the Denver hype. Good for you.
Don't get all butt hurt because I shared my opinion on Denver...don't be a .
No, being a is obsessing over beating the Texans.
No, being a is saying someone is obsessing over something when they are clearly not. Being a is making up like that.....I just making fun of them like Im making fun of the broncos 3 game skid. Quit being a and getting your panties tied up.
You're right. I don't know where I would have gotten that idea.
from making up because thats what s like you do
That's good, man. You really stuck it to me with that one. Keep up the good work.
I did, didn't I.
As long as you learned your lesson kid, thats the important thing. But keep your chin up, maybe the broncos will slip into the playoffs as a wild card. I doubt it, but you never know.
Ah - the "kid" line. Internet 101. Again, sharp work on your end.
Know what you should do?
You should tell me you're not obsessed with the Texans with a username like "LOL Texans", a "Crap>Texans" line under your username and scads of ridiculous posts in the "2009 Texans" thread, taking the time and effort to put down anything and everything Texan-related.
But yeah - you're not obsessed.
ing gobbler.
Oh Im sorry, I figured you were a kid since you had a comic book character as an avatar...my bad.
But your "internet 101" line is a bit contradicting. What with you using the ever so popular sarcasm shtick. You know the "You really stuck it to me with that one." line.
I believe one could find that in the "Internet for Dummies" hand book. Guess you have the book.
And I figured you were into dudes because you had a picture of two of them in yours. Maybe you're the Lucky Pierre.
LOL texans = J.T. ?
Say it ain't so.
I swear on Peyton Manning's right arm that LOL texans isn't me.
What about your ? Or your dope? Swear on those?
I swear on my and my dope that LOL texans isn't me.
Nah, JT's gay, but he's not THAT gay.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions