Reply With Quote
come on whottt.
beg me.
i'm worried about the kid that she dumped.
come on whottt.
beg me.
Beg you to what? Stop using Palin's children to attack her?
Way I look at it...
You're either the kind of man(and I use that term loosely) that goes after kids or else you aren't...and you obviously are.
I am sure it is totally justified in your mind...it always is with people like you...clammy.
Watching Winehole clean house around here is just awesome.
This thread reminds me of why I visit this forum less and less these days. The arguments, save for a select few, just make my brain hurt with stupid.
So what do you have to add?
Does it matter? Anything worthwhile I have to say is going to be mocked, ridiculed, and strawmanned into oblivion anyway.
But if you really want to know, I think it's kind of an overreaction on everyone's part. Was the photo even that bad? She's wearing a of a lot more than most female runners I see during long-distance races (I've seen many runners her age that are wearing just a bit more than a bikini. It's part of running.). I don't understand how Sarah Palin can continue to pose for photographs and then whine when the press gives her attention. And I don't understand how she wants to be taken seriously when she quit her job.
Most of all, I don't understand why this country is so offended by sex. I mean, really? Isn't it all how we got here? ZOMG A WOMAN IS BEING PORTRAYED AS A SEXUAL CREATURE WHO'S ATTRACTIVE. There are far worse things to me than what is happening to Sarah Palin, and I really wish America would stop treating sex like a horrible thing. There are 6,000,000,000 people on the planet, so to act like sex is the evil abused pink elephant in the room is kind of sad, to me. So I guess I really don't understand her outrage. She chose to step onto the national stage, and she continues to enjoy making waves in the news, but the instant media takes her in a way she didn't intend, she gets upset about it. She's invites attention and then cries when she gets too much of it.
Ms. Palin -- perhaps if you don't want things wrote, said, or transmitted in any way by the media -- it might be a prudent idea to not publish a huge novel to cash in on your new found fame and then do an interview for a nationally published magazine. I'm a little confused that you seem to be upset for what essentially amounts to being called a hottie, and if you really had some political chops, you would likely have no problems swinging this around to your advantage, instead of sulking, as it appears that is what you are presently doing. Mr. Obama, who you have criticized so candidly, did not even bother to mention the shirtless photo of himself that was also published on a major magazine, and that was one he did not even voluntarily pose for. So I'm really curious what you are attempting to accomplish by this, unless it's just to get more attention. Which is kind of sad, really, since you purport yourself here to be about promoting a healthy women's image, and I fail to see how being an attention- could do that.
The "tl; dr" version: You want out of the media? Stop voluntarily putting yourself in a position where you're going to be talked about. Just stop. Period.
Just my opinion. You did ask.
Last edited by Cry Havoc; 11-19-2009 at 03:33 AM.
Almost everything ends up as strawmen and ad hominem attacks here while people push their party line like they are being paid to do so.
The offensiveness to sex and nudity is also hilarious. There are 3 billion other people on the planet with the same parts you have, yet you are taught to be ashamed of them. That is no small number. There are more genitals per square mile than there are murderers. How is something so common and natural vilified?
Also, the whole Palin "woe is me" thing is a deliberate political move IMO, and it is being used by most of the GOP. Their ranks are down and its easy to bring back the stray sheep and a few moderates by playing the victim card against the opposition. While she is polarizing, it isn't clear that she is actually unelectable or that her strategy harms her or the GOP. The left got a strong base established due to Bush and the war. This pulled a lot of people from the right and center; but many of the left's policies are disliked by the same group and it is easy for them to swing back.
I honestly don't think she wants out of the media. Her book wouldn't have sold nearly as well if she wasn't on the front pages every couple days. She also isn't nearly as hate-able as the left makes her out to be, especially to the general voting public. The GOP has no leader, but Palin has become a household name. The amount of dollars spent campaigning is proof positive that name recognition is important, and Palin is getting an enormous amount of it for free.
I personally dislike her and the left is playing into her hands by constantly attacking or replying to her. They have made themselves look like aggressors and are contributing to her attention whoring. Ripping apart Bush was a good strategy because of the widespread disenchantment of the war, but Palin has no such baggage other than some stupidity. Yet if history is any indicator, people do not mind electing the inept.
tldr: People are re s in politics, sex, and debating.
that was easy.
i just can't get enough of whottt's delusional relationship with palin.
No ...and you stand out among your peers like Obama at a KKK rally.
too easy.
I know you are but what am I?
Geez...I suppose you do it because you feel they are mental equals. And you are probably wrong about that.
throw a fit. you know you want to.
Go after the litttle children again. You know you want too...like you did earlier in this thread. The only person to do so.
how can i go after a little kid thats appears to have vanished?
what will she use for sympathy?
she's taking a lot of flak over this empty book.
i bet she breaks the kid out any day now.
Stupid question, the catfish that feel her kids are fair game are going to go after her kids to get to her whether they are in the picture or not.
Do you need a link?
Somehow...I actually think you do.
so, it's the baby's fault that it's mom uses him as a prop. gotcha!
I don't see Sarah Palin using her child as a prop...I do however still see you USING the child to attack her.
Plain and simple that is what you are doing, and that is the kind of person you are.
i'm trying to protect the kid.
any day now, she'll feel the heat and put the kid between her and the flame.
poor kid.
oh, i forgot.
2 e z
No you aren't...that's not what you are doing at all. You are a political bottom feeder who believes he can mask the obvious reality he is a political bottom feeder by hiding behing a mask of ty, unfunny and tedious glibness.
you should change your name to "palin's panty shield".
And you should change your name to...infants are fair game, and ez.
don't put me in palin's group.
i don't use my kid as a prop.
I understand that is a photo over 1o years old, from a photo shoot from 'Runners World' that the photographer did not have the permission to sell to Newsweek. They've recieved criticism for using this photo. As they should. I'm not a Palin fan and I dont think she's the answer because of a vareity of reasons, but I don't have the hate towards her that so many whack jobs seem to have. To describe her as 'evil' is ludicrous.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
