Reply With Quote
i love the way she pulls the mike away from the guy. (okay, okay...that's enough stupidity for now. we have to go to camera now).
Last edited by spursncowboys; 11-20-2009 at 12:47 PM.
i love the way she pulls the mike away from the guy. (okay, okay...that's enough stupidity for now. we have to go to camera now).
I want the last 2:27 of my life back.
was that school in china ? all they needed to add was chairman barrack to make that complete.
"I don't see anything in here about tax cuts" He said in the 80's.
I always wondered where they got the mmm mmmm mmmm B H O.
which one is 12 y.o.a? both looked like adults--ignorant adults, but adults nonetheless.
I thought you claimed that Media Matters takes things out of context? It's good to know that you now accept them as a legit site.
The young girl in the first video.
I wonder if the Obama kids are going to be on rush limbaugh.
So she wasn't 12 years old.
So were you outraged when Bush had schoolkids sing his praises on the White house lawn too.
she appears to be older, and I didn't hear her age mentioned on video. Do you have any info on her age, or are you misleading us with the thread le?
I found it hilarious that Odonnell picked out a little kid to interview errr ambush. It was also amusing how she had, coincidentally, cue cards filled with Palin propaganda. If only she had facts instead of innuendos.
Really does she appear to be over the voting age? Would a drive by apologist like yourself atleast be able to describe her as a kid? If so, then why did this non liberal ideologue attack a kid? Since she is a non partisan media personality, why this kid and not an adult in a room full of Palin supporters? Why start the interview off with the anti palin tidbits?
Again, how do you personally know her age?
maybe he likes 12 year old girls.
she appears to be voting age (18 y.o.a). I would describe her as a kid in relative terms (like she's a kid compared to me) but she's most likely an adult according to statute. I don't agree that Nora is a "liberal ideologue," nor do I agree that she "attacked," nor do I agree (or, at least it hasn't been established) that the subject is a "kid."
because she and her friend are wearing pro-Palin and anti-government shirts one could conclude that they were palin supporters, and they would be likely candidates to interview since the topic was palin and her supporters. the adult man standing next to her was interviewed as well and he represented you palin supporters quite skillfully, didn't he? To what anti-palin tidbits are you referring? that she supported something her ill-informed supporter didn't know she supported? that she took a photo that she now disagrees with? what exactly is anti-palin about recalling the things palin either supported or did as an adult?Since she is a non partisan media personality, why this kid and not an adult in a room full of Palin supporters? Why start the interview off with the anti palin tidbits?
I'd be willing to bet she's in college. Maybe one with a religious bent.
on a tangent i really am curious as to when drive-by became a part of the american vernacular.
Rushbo. I find it hilarious since all those who uses that term fit the definition themselves.
I'm a drive-by apologist for someone or something. I'm kind of fuzzy on how I'm an apologist for asking SnC to clarify his thread le.
Last edited by Oh, Gee!!; 11-19-2009 at 05:02 PM.
ah, sheep language.
IS outrage!
Where's Manny? Somebody has projected. Call Manny, this forum needs him badly!
i said "maybe", G.
Manny is gonna have to pull out his book of penal codes on this one.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
