Did Christianity Cause the Crash?

**Blake** · 11-20-2009

Not when I do it, I do it because they are overwhelmingly stupid.

naw. It's easier to just ignore without actually pressing a button.

That's a fail......and you're not the only person that has me on ignore.

I don't really care.

Judging by your post count, I have no reason to doubt that.

It's not up to me to dictate who is involved or who isn't...anyone that wants to be involved can be involved, anyone that doesn't shouldn't have too.

Of course it's not, but you brought up the point about having the rich meet the poor to work it out.

I would say to the middle class that want the Universal Healthcare, go over and ask the rich to give it to you. And if they give a yes, contratulations,. And if they give a you a no...oh well.

are you drunk?

Because the only other people to get it from would be the middle class that don't want it, to recieve it, or to pay for it. And since they are the same as you, not richer, not poorer, you have absolutely no basis for taking anything from them.

I'm guessing yes.

Anwersing that would make me a pastor,

You could answer it and I can pretty much guarantee you nobody but you will think "pastor"

and since I have no desire to be one, I'll let someone else make that interpretation for you. I imagine you will have no problem finding the answer you want to hear.

I'm betting nobody else here thinks Jesus was maybe "on to something".

You are referred to as an idiotic, fluff filled poster.......by at least one poster

**ChumpDumper** · 11-20-2009

Originally Posted by whottt

The author is Jewish, and she's a liberal. I don't know if it's funnier that she doesn't see her own bias, or that you don't. Or ...that Marcus Bryant doesn't.

Yes I have checked that information out. No I didn't before making the original statement.

Nor does she seem to realize that:

A. Organized religions have always been about financial prosperity. That's what they do, they harness the financial power of religion. Judaism pretty much invented the concept.

B. She doesn't even realize that it's the turn towards Judaism that bothers her the most.

C. Christianity is less materialistic than either Judaism or Islam...they just happen to be wealthier inspite of that. Maybe Jesus was on to something...

In any case, just about every other religious movement does something similar, nice of her to keep eye on the christians and let them know if they are doing a good job or not though.

So Jews can never write about Christians?

K.

**whottt** · 11-20-2009

Originally Posted by Blake

naw. It's easier to just ignore without actually pressing a button.

That's a fail......and you're not the only person that has me on ignore.

I bet they have you on ignore for the same reason I do, it's not because of your arguments, it's because you are overhwhelmingly stupid.

People saying the ST basketball forum has been overrun by idiots? They aren't saying that because of the challenging and insightful discussion being held therein, they are saying that because it legitimately has been overrun by idiots.

Seriously.

And it's always funny when someone on ignore gives me their opinion about being on ignore...if I cared about your opinion, you wouldn't be on ignore.

Don't let the fact that I had any sort of a discussion with you confound you here...does being on ignore mean I never read? No. Every once in a while I do, sometimes a debate happens...because not everyone stays stupid. But in this case it was just cir stance, I probably would not have clicked to de-ignore. I was logged out.

**whottt** · 11-20-2009

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

So Jews can never write about Christians?

K.

K yourself.

**Marcus Bryant** · 11-20-2009

Why is it verboten to agree with a ''liberal Jew,' Herr whottt?

**ChumpDumper** · 11-20-2009

Well, according to whottt every Christian here is now disqualified from posting about any other religion or lack thereof.

That might be a good thing.

**whottt** · 11-20-2009

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Well, according to whottt every Christian here is now disqualified from posting about any other religion or lack thereof.

That might be a good thing.

Originally Posted by Marcus Bryant

Why is it verboten to agree with a ''liberal Jew,' Herr whottt?

Links? I never said anything of the kind.

**ChumpDumper** · 11-20-2009

Sure you can post about them, but your bias is too strong for you to be taken seriously.

**Ignignokt** · 11-20-2009

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Sure you can post about them, but your bias is too strong for you to be taken seriously.

So you agree with WHott?

**whottt** · 11-20-2009

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Sure you can post about them, but your bias is too strong for you to be taken seriously.

I don't know, my impression when I read that article was that it was biased and biased in a fashion I have seen before, I concluded it was written by a liberal jew and lo and behold I was right. It was a generalization and I certainly could have wound up looking like a dumbass for making it...however, I was right.

I then gave a basis for why it was biased, what it overlooked, both about historical Christianity(and relgion) not to mention Judaism.

It was biased, it had exactly the source of bias I claimed it did, I don't see any sort of bias impacting my opinion. I see my conclusion was right and it stands to reason my reasons for drawing that conclusion were also right. Ignorance and denial(hers, not mine).

You tell me, what is my bias, what is the source of my bias chump?

Show me how it is skewing my perception...I genuinely don't like having a skewed perception so you can count on me to be truly open minded here.

Let's see if your conclusion turns out to be anywhere near as accurate as mine was. It won't. In spite of the fact you know more about me than I did about the author of that article as I was reading it.

I am capable of being biased, I wasn't biased in any conclusion I made regarding this article though. The known facts bear out I was accurate, not biased.

**ChumpDumper** · 11-20-2009

I would have preferred to see the full results of the poll, but the link was broken. I don't think she drew any hard and fast conclusions, so the question mark in the le was justified and instructive.

**Ignignokt** · 11-20-2009

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

I would have preferred to see the full results of the poll, but the link was broken. I don't think she drew any hard and fast conclusions, so the question mark in the le was justified and instructive.

Latino Osteens caused the crash! No hard conclusions there! lololololololololololololololol

x1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000

**ChumpDumper** · 11-20-2009

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

Latino Osteens caused the crash! No hard conclusions there! lololololololololololololololol

x1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000

Show me the quote where she said that.

**Ignignokt** · 11-20-2009

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Show me the quote where she said that.

She focused her data on Latino prosperity gospel believers to prove her thesis. Most Latino's are catholics, and Latinos are not known for controlling vast amounts of wealth in proportionate to other affluent minorities.

Fail!

**ChumpDumper** · 11-20-2009

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

She focused her data on Latino prosperity gospel believers to prove her thesis. Most Latino's are catholics, and Latinos are not known for controlling vast amounts of wealth in proportionate to other affluent minorities.

Fail!

So you don't have a quote.

Fail!

**Ignignokt** · 11-20-2009

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

So you don't have a quote.

Fail!

Don't have to, Latino Osteens is my own word to describe what she meant by Latino christians believing in the prosperity gospel.

SO you didn't read the article.

Fail

**ChumpDumper** · 11-20-2009

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

Don't have to, Latino Osteens is my own word to describe what she meant by Latino christians believing in the prosperity gospel.

SO you didn't read the article.

Fail

I definitely read the article. She never said Latino Osteens caused the crash and you can't find a quote where she said that.

Fail