Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 107
  1. #1
    Veteran jack0fspeed's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    241
    The hype is totally out of hand. The Mavs picked up a player with roughly the same numbers.

    http://www.nba.com/playerfile/kris_humphries/

    http://www.nba.com/playerfile/dejuan_blair/

    Neither one is going to be an NBA starter so who cares?

    Rodrigue Beaubois on the other hand is going to be a big time player.

  2. #2
    NBAChamp..to be Continued SpurNation's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    1,473
    Neither one is going to be an NBA starter so who cares?
    So why post?

  3. #3
    "We'll do it this time" Bartleby's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    2,678
    If Humphries were a rookie the comparison might be somewhat valid, but he's not and what you're seeing from him now is probably the most you can expect. Blair, on the other hand, is just starting to adapt to his game to the NBA.

  4. #4
    Veteran jack0fspeed's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    241
    I've been hearing what geniuses Spurs management were for "stealing" Blair in the second round. Furthermore all offseason the talk was of how great the Spurs did. Where is it? Which of the offseason acquisitions looks great so far?

    Frankly I look at the Mavs and even if Shawn Marion looks a little shaky everything else the Mavs did in the offseason looks great.

  5. #5
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Post Count
    2,539
    Patience young grasshoppa

  6. #6
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    I've been hearing what geniuses Spurs management were for "stealing" Blair in the second round. Furthermore all offseason the talk was of how great the Spurs did. Where is it? Which of the offseason acquisitions looks great so far?

    Frankly I look at the Mavs and even if Shawn Marion looks a little shaky everything else the Mavs did in the offseason looks great.

    So the thread really has nothing to do with Blair, and everything to do with you trolling the Mavs. What happened? Did you get kicked out of the circle-jerk on the Mavs' forums?

  7. #7
    Veteran Spursmania's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    8,104
    So the thread really has nothing to do with Blair, and everything to do with you trolling the Mavs. What happened? Did you get kicked out of the circle-jerk on the Mavs' forums?
    Yep, some Mav fans are so predictable, petty and pathetic...

  8. #8
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Post Count
    2,539
    I would take Humphries over Blair though.

  9. #9
    Veteran jack0fspeed's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    241
    Patience young grasshoppa
    I'm fine with that. Blair may eventually develop into a starter caliber player. It doesn't look that way today, but George Hill didn't look like he was going to be a starter caliber player last year either.

    But can we quit talking about Blair like the Spurs management pulled one over on the league? The Spurs pulled a backup level player with some upside out of the second round. That's nice but it doesn't make anyone a genius.

  10. #10
    Believe. SpursChampsIII's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    462
    The hype is totally out of hand. The Mavs picked up a player with roughly the same numbers.

    http://www.nba.com/playerfile/kris_humphries/

    http://www.nba.com/playerfile/dejuan_blair/

    Neither one is going to be an NBA starter so who cares?

    Rodrigue Beaubois on the other hand is going to be a big time player.


    First you start talking about Humphries/Blair, then throw out a Beaubois is better than him too, nanny, nanny, boo, boo. What are you, fvckin 9 years old?

    Let me sum up the Mavs' existence for you--win quite a few games, but don't win sh!t--sh!t being an NBA le.

  11. #11
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    I'm fine with that. Blair may eventually develop into a starter caliber player. It doesn't look that way today, but George Hill didn't look like he was going to be a starter caliber player last year either.

    But can we quit talking about Blair like the Spurs management pulled one over on the league? The Spurs pulled a backup level player with some upside out of the second round. That's nice but it doesn't make anyone a genius.

    Remember when the Mavs trolls carried on about Brandon Bass like he was the next Shaq? And he averaged about 2 points and 2 boards in his first 2 seasons. And Kris Humphries? He averaged about 4 points and 3 boards over the first 5 years of his career. He's not in Blair's league right now, and Blair is just getting started.

    Paul Millsap averaged 6.8 points and 5.2 boards, and was a foul machine in his first season. He wasn't exactly scrap heap material.

    Theo Ratliff was a starter for a number of years. But in his rookie season he averaged 4.5 points and 4 boards in 17.4 minutes per game. In Rasho's first 2 full seasons he averaged about 5 points and 4.3 boards, in 19 minutes. So far, Blair is averaging 5.6 points and 5.2 boards in 14.6 minutes per game.

    When you consider that Blair is a rookie, playing for the most demanding defensive coach in the league (maybe ever?), he's doing just fine. You can have Kris Humphries.

  12. #12
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    I've been hearing what geniuses Spurs management were for "stealing" Blair in the second round.
    Who said the FO "stole" him? He was projected in the 1st round because he was a great college talent. Other teams were foolish to keep passing on him.

    I'm fine with that. Blair may eventually develop into a starter caliber player. It doesn't look that way today,
    Have you seen him play at all? I think the answer is, "Yeah I saw him play in those two games against the Mavs"
    but George Hill didn't look like he was going to be a starter caliber player last year either.
    smh

    But can we quit talking about Blair like the Spurs management pulled one over on the league?
    No one is saying that. How do you pull one over on the league when everyone was shocked how far he was falling?
    The Spurs pulled a backup level player with some upside out of the second round. That's nice but it doesn't make anyone a genius.
    Blair is averaging 5.6 point and 5.2 rebounds in only 14.6 minutes. Per 30 minutes that would be 11.5 points and 10.7 rebounds. HORRIBLE!!!!

    This thread is dumb.

  13. #13
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    I'm fine with that. Blair may eventually develop into a starter caliber player. It doesn't look that way today, but George Hill didn't look like he was going to be a starter caliber player last year either.

    But can we quit talking about Blair like the Spurs management pulled one over on the league? The Spurs pulled a backup level player with some upside out of the second round. That's nice but it doesn't make anyone a genius.
    Actually it does. Getting ANYTHING out of the second round deserves a pat on the back.

    Oh, and WTG, comparing a 5 year vet to a rook.

  14. #14
    Veteran jack0fspeed's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    241


    First you start talking about Humphries/Blair, then throw out a Beaubois is better than him too, nanny, nanny, boo, boo. What are you, fvckin 9 years old?

    Let me sum up the Mavs' existence for you--win quite a few games, but don't win sh!t--sh!t being an NBA le.
    OK, forget I ever compared the Spurs offseason with the Mavs.

    Does it still look like the Spurs had the "best offseason in the NBA"?

  15. #15
    Veteran jack0fspeed's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    241
    Remember when the Mavs trolls carried on about Brandon Bass like he was the next Shaq? And he averaged about 2 points and 2 boards in his first 2 seasons. And Kris Humphries? He averaged about 4 points and 3 boards over the first 5 years of his career. He's not in Blair's league right now, and Blair is just getting started.

    Paul Millsap averaged 6.8 points and 5.2 boards, and was a foul machine in his first season. He wasn't exactly scrap heap material.

    ...
    When you consider that Blair is a rookie, playing for the most demanding defensive coach in the league (maybe ever?), he's doing just fine. You can have Kris Humphries.
    Paul Misap averages 10 and 6 in 27 minutes.

    Brandon Bass played in New Orleans for his first 2 years so I doubt Mavs trolls were raving about him.

    Oh, and by the way BB is about 9 and 5 in 20 minutes for the last 4 years.

    So you are saying that Blair has the upside of Paul Milsap and that Brandon Bass sucks? Blair, Bass, and Milsap are all the same player my friend.

  16. #16
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    Paul Misap averages 10 and 6 in 27 minutes.

    Brandon Bass played in New Orleans for his first 2 years so I doubt Mavs trolls were raving about him.

    Oh, and by the way BB is about 9 and 5 in 20 minutes for the last 4 years.

    So you are saying that Blair has the upside of Paul Milsap and that Brandon Bass sucks? Blair, Bass, and Milsap are all the same player my friend.
    Bass averages 9 and 3 for his career in 21 minutes. So if we average that out to 30 minutes he still averages fewer rebounds than Blair averages in 14 minutes. His BEST season was last season when he averaged 8.5 and 4.5 in 19.4 minutes.

    Per 30 minutes that's 13 pts and 6.9 rebounds.

  17. #17
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Paul Misap averages 10 and 6 in 27 minutes.
    Yes, unexpectedly having to share the 4 spot with Booz has cut his numbers. Last year, he averaged 13.5/8.6.

  18. #18
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    Millsap's rookie year:

    6.8 and 5.1 in 18 minutes

    That's:

    11.3 and 8.5 in 30 minutes

    Funny

  19. #19
    NBAChamp..to be Continued SpurNation's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    1,473
    lol at Spurs fan hyping on one of their own players in a Spurs message board. Oh the nerve of it all.

    I can see your point Mavs fan. I mean really...what do they talk about on a Mav's site? Rookie players compared to vets? Missing trophies? Dust?

  20. #20
    Veteran jack0fspeed's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    241
    Yes, unexpectedly having to share the 4 spot with Booz has cut his numbers. Last year, he averaged 13.5/8.6.
    No, last year Boozer was unexpected out most of the year AND Milsap was in a contract year.

    Even if you want to give Blair the benefit of the doubt and say he'll get to Millsap 2008-2009 numbers the hype is still way out of hand.

    edit: And by the way, Millsap is a great illustration of how production on the second unit doesn't necessarily extend to production on the first unit.

    Much like preseason production doesn't extend to regular season production.
    Last edited by jack0fspeed; 11-28-2009 at 11:33 AM.

  21. #21
    keep asking questions George Gervin's Afro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    11,409
    Blair may eventually develop into a starter caliber player. It doesn't look that way today, but George Hill didn't look like he was going to be a starter caliber player last year either.

    But can we quit talking about Blair like the Spurs management pulled one over on the league?
    irony

  22. #22
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Rodrigue Beaubois on the other hand is going to be a big time player.
    the hype is still way out of hand.

  23. #23
    Veteran weebo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    5,512
    Rodrigue Beaubois big time player???

  24. #24
    PINOY BOHOLANO#21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    529
    No, last year Boozer was unexpected out most of the year AND Milsap was in a contract year.

    Even if you want to give Blair the benefit of the doubt and say he'll get to Millsap 2008-2009 numbers the hype is still way out of hand.

    edit: And by the way, Millsap is a great illustration of how production on the second unit doesn't necessarily extend to production on the first unit.

    Much like preseason production doesn't extend to regular season production.
    Hey idiot, get your team a NBA le before you post something. The team earned the praises coz of the le they won. Just STFU...

  25. #25
    We'll Be Back Spursfan092120's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    20,390
    No, last year Boozer was unexpected out most of the year AND Milsap was in a contract year.

    Even if you want to give Blair the benefit of the doubt and say he'll get to Millsap 2008-2009 numbers the hype is still way out of hand.

    edit: And by the way, Millsap is a great illustration of how production on the second unit doesn't necessarily extend to production on the first unit.

    Much like preseason production doesn't extend to regular season production.
    DeJuan Blair is averaging 5.6 and 5.2 as a rookie, playing only 14 minutes a game. Millsap is averaging 10.5 and 6.3 as a 4 year vet playing 27 minutes a game. not exactly a fair comparison. And Humphries is a 6 year vet...shame on you for comparing him with them. But the fact that you are shows that you are impressed by Blair too...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •