Reply With Quote
I remember someone said mccoy was better than Bradford. rofl
That was 4cc
i think
I remember someone said mccoy was better than Bradford. rofl
I said McCoy was better in the game of college football than Bradford last year.
And this year actually, lol.
Bradford crumbled like a stack of smegma in his very first career game without a dominant offensive line. Colt probably ruptured his scrot when Suh tossed him around like a ragdoll last night and didn't even fumble. And that's his speciality!
um....he is. check the stats, dude. Check the guts...It's no contest.
Well first off, I've got to give my respects to Nebraska-they played a of a game on defense. I might have a man crush on Suh and he doesn't even play for my team. That guy is a complete beast, he literally controlled the line of scrimmage the entire game. One of the most dominating defensive performances by a single individual that I've seen in over 30 years of watching college football.
BUT, we won. And in the end it doesn't matter if it's by 1 point or 40, UT just collected our 3rd Big XII championship and we're going to the big dance yet again. I sincerely hope that our offensive line pulls their collective heads out of their ass before the tide come rolling into Pasadena. Their play was pathetic. Out special teams also needs some kind of wake up call. I've never been a fan of that rugby style punting, and it should speak volumes to Mack and the rest of the coaches that the best punting all night was by McCoy. Get Gold out on the field for the alabama game!!
My gut feeling at this point is we'll be lucky to stay within 10 points of alabama if they play anywhere close to the level they played against florida. However, a few things to consider:
1. Major used to be the OC at Alabama, he knows that system and knows their tendencies. Could be helpful in how we defend bama.
2. Could have a DJ back by the big game, have heard a few things indicating this might happen.
3. Our defense played a of a game against Nebraska, if they can have another outstanding game we've got a chance. I also think we defend better against running teams that don't run out of the spread (as the ags did with great success against us), and bama is more of a traditional running team.
4. If Ingram wins the Heisman (he gets my vote), the spotlight is completely on bama and we've got nothing to lose, the world is against us, nobody thinks we can win, etc. Sound similar to a theme from a game back in 2005? That kind of motivation could work for us.
I will now commence heavy pill/booze use so that I can stay in a semi-coma until the night of the game. Hook'em!
yeah rugby punting doesnt work so well when you hesitate, then roll directly into the defender for a block
the offense line is i hate to say, all these guys were here last year except dockery and they all got weaker and have the worst feet and lower bodies ive ever seen in a texas line
a team cannot keep recruiting white 270 lb kids with 4.0 GPAs, you cant do things like that and it caught up with them. mcwhorter is going to be forced into retirement or fired after this year
too bad that's all that Gardere can really hang his hat on. His one bowl appearance was an ass kicking in the Cotton Bowl by Miami
Check the Heisman
if only you were miami oklahoma fan you would have scoreboard blake
yeah, other than 39-33, I really have none.
that sure was techs greatest moment ever, ranked #1, tie for the big 12 south and lose a bowl game
itll never get better than that
Yes, because we both know that the Heisman is ALWAYS accurate..
ranked #2 and yeah, it might never get better than that.
well you're a Colt nuthugger, so we can pretty much determine that you are hardly EVER accurate.
wow..Blake going to the nuthugger reference..what a shocker. You know what? He's the most accurate NCAA QB in history...the most wins of any NCAA QB in history...most accurate NCAA QB in a single season...if me saying he's better than Bradford is nuthugging, then yeah..I am..because there ain't a damn thing that puts Bradford above McCoy in any way, shape, or form. Stats, wins, accuracy...Colt's better in everything. Saying Bradford is better than McCoy is just sad and ridiculous, and just shows that your judgment is blinded by your hatred of UT's success...oh...that and you're a .
you admitted you are. That waters down any argument you make.
he had the best accuracy % ever last year and Bradford still had a higher QB rating, threw for more TDs (50 - McCoy's 34) while both had 8 INTs.You know what? He's the most accurate NCAA QB in history...the most wins of any NCAA QB in history...most accurate NCAA QB in a single season...
yes you are. at least you admit it again.if me saying he's better than Bradford is nuthugging, then yeah..I am..
Heisman trophybecause there ain't a damn thing that puts Bradford above McCoy in any way, shape, or form.
stats, no. Heisman trophy in head to head voting during Colt's best accuracy year, no.Stats, wins, accuracy...Colt's better in everything.
Saying McCoy is better than Bradford is just sad and ridiculous and just shows that your judgement is blinded by the nuts in front of your face........oh....that and you're a nuthugger.Saying Bradford is better than McCoy is just sad and ridiculous, and just shows that your judgment is blinded by your hatred of UT's success...oh...that and you're a .
And yet Texas still won.
Charlie Ward?Heisman trophy
Colt has 5000 more yards and 24 more touchdowns...how is that not better?stats, no. Heisman trophy in head to head voting during Colt's best accuracy year, no.
To say that the QB with the most wins and best accuracy in NCAA history is better than a QB who doesn't have those records is not blind judgment. It's called reality. When you enter into it, let me know, and maybe I'll discuss it with you.Saying McCoy is better than Bradford is just sad and ridiculous and just shows that your judgement is blinded by the nuts in front of your face........oh....that and you're a nuthugger.
Where's BJ Simmons on the all time list? Kliff Kingsbury? I thought I saw Sonny bie and Harrell on there somewhere. Didn't those guys win a big 12 championship? Damn, I'm gonna have to go find e s and ask him
you can be the best player in the country, but when youre constantly getting hurt, youre not very valuable
I remember you saying the same things about me. Now you can't get enough of my salty, fecally goodness.you admitted you are. That waters down any argument you make.
he had the best accuracy % ever last year and Bradford still had a higher QB rating, threw for more TDs (50 - McCoy's 34) while both had 8 INTs.
yes you are. at least you admit it again.
Heisman trophy
stats, no. Heisman trophy in head to head voting during Colt's best accuracy year, no.
Saying McCoy is better than Bradford is just sad and ridiculous and just shows that your judgement is blinded by the nuts in front of your face........oh....that and you're a nuthugger.
and yet Bradford out played McCoy in the game.
Texas won because they ran the ball well and because of great special teams play, like the Shipley return for a TD.
was not on the 2008 Heisman ballot....Charlie Ward?
but Colt and Bradford both were.
Graham Harrell has 2500 more yards and 22 more touchdowns than Colt...how is that not better?Colt has 5000 more yards and 24 more touchdowns...how is that not better?
To think that Colt would be the winningest QB in NCAA history on almost any other team would be blind judgement. When you jump off Colt's nuts, let me know and maybe I'll discuss it with you.To say that the QB with the most wins and best accuracy in NCAA history is better than a QB who doesn't have those records is not blind judgment. It's called reality. When you enter into it, let me know, and maybe I'll discuss it with you.
whisky is a uva drug
You're right. Colt had nothing to do with the win.Texas won because they ran the ball well and because of great special teams play, like the Shipley return for a TD.
Maybe if Texas threw 60 times a game and kept Colt out there while running up the score on hapless opponents...Graham Harrell has 2500 more yards and 22 more touchdowns than Colt...how is that not better?
To think that Colt would be the winningest QB in NCAA history on almost any other team would be blind judgement.No . Best Blake argument yet. But hey, Crabtree wouldn't of had those 20 touchdown catch seasons if he was at any other school in any other offense.
Do you ever get tired of being a Texas hating re ?
Obviously you never get tired of trolling.
Another fine job!
didn't say he didn't. I'm saying Bradfor had the better game and UT wouldn't have won if not for the running game and special teams.
maybe. But he didn't.Maybe if Texas threw 60 times a game and kept Colt out there while running up the score on hapless opponents...
So if you or 90210 wants to talk about how Colt > Bradford because of career stats, well then I can think of a few QBs who have better career numbers than Colt.
That's probably correct.......but I'm not trying to argue that Crabtree is the best WR ever.
Stick to being a troll. you look like a fool when you are trying to be serious.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
