Reply With Quote
you're a much better troll when you log in as kermit
So, I talked to Colt's Ass today and he can't wait to be introduced to Blake's Tounge. They seem like a match made in analangus heaven.
you're a much better troll when you log in as kermit
was at the game! crazy ending
Sorry. Sounded to me like that was what you were implying.
True. Not everyone can be Grahmmmmmmm Harrelllllllllllll and run up the score. Cost Vince a Hesiman.maybe. But he didn't.
Me too. I've also never said that Colt is better than Bradford. Just less crosseyed.So if you or 90210 wants to talk about how Colt > Bradford because of
career stats, well then I can think of a few QBs who have better career numbers than Colt.
I'm not trying to argue that Colt is the best ever. I don't think anyone is. It's all in your head.That's probably correct.......but I'm not trying to argue that Crabtree is the best WR ever.
Says one troll to another.Stick to being a troll. you look like a fool when you are trying to be serious.
I'll come up with something better to troll you with. Like Kermit.
winners win...losers lose
just trying to explain to a simpleton like you that just because someone can win a heisman doesn't mean they're the best player.was not on the 2008 Heisman ballot....
but Colt and Bradford both were.
WTF?Graham Harrell has 2500 more yards and 22 more touchdowns than Colt...how is that not better?
Colt McCoy - 13,244 yards 112 touchdowns
Sam Bradford - 8,403 yards 88 touchdowns
Now if you're going to try to tell me that Bradford is a better college QB because he played better in one season, you must be trolling, because I know not even your dumb ass believes that one season makes a player better than the other. Nice try though.
But you know what? He didn't have to do it on any other team. He did it on the Longhorns. And to think Bradford would have been as successful as he was on any other team is just as dumb...because Oklahoma was supposed to be a LOT better than UT last year...then they lost to them.To think that Colt would be the winningest QB in NCAA history on almost any other team would be blind judgement. When you jump off Colt's nuts, let me know and maybe I'll discuss it with you.
Na, I'm not in the business of making things up.I'm not trying to argue that Colt is the best ever. I don't think anyone is. It's all in your head.
I don't go into threads looking to bust anyone's chops. If chops get busted, it's just a side effect of their ignorance getting exposed.Says one troll to another.
did you come up with that by yourself?
your argument was that Colt's stats were better than Bradford's.
just explaining to a misinformed idiot like you that not winning a Heisman doesn't help your argument.just trying to explain to a simpleton like you that just because someone can win a heisman doesn't mean they're the best player.
Why are you going back to career numbers?WTF?
Colt McCoy - 13,244 yards 112 touchdowns
Sam Bradford - 8,403 yards 88 touchdowns
Obviously you think that just sticking around for 4 years and racking up more career totals instead of per game totals means he is automatically better than Bradford.Now if you're going to try to tell me that Bradford is a better college QB because he played better in one season, you must be trolling, because I know not even your dumb ass believes that one season makes a player better than the other. Nice try though.
You must be nut hugging because I know not even your dumbass believes career numbers make one player better than the other.
Terrible try.
I wonder how many Georgia nut huggers were running around calling David Greene the best QB ever before Colt broke his record of most wins.But you know what? He didn't have to do it on any other team. He did it on the Longhorns. And to think Bradford would have been as successful as he was on any other team is just as dumb...because Oklahoma was supposed to be a LOT better than UT last year...then they lost to them.
and that he got more wins...that was another argument...selective reading is not a good thing.
Guess a misinformed idiot like you needs to hear that winning a heisman isn't everythingjust explaining to a misinformed idiot like you that not winning a Heisman doesn't help your argument.
Maybe because we're discussing who the best QB is...and the entire ing career is what matters..not one season.Why are you going back to career numbers?
Obviously you're assuming that the glass bodied Bradford would be able to stay healthy and play as good as he has his entire career. And your assumptions have GOT to be right, don't they? One guy went out, stayed healthy, and got the stats, and one guy didn't. That's what matters.Obviously you think that just sticking around for 4 years and racking up more career totals instead of per game totals means he is automatically better than Bradford.
OK..so then you tell me, since you can't use numbers to tell who's the better QB, how the do you do it? You tell me what makes Bradford better than McCoy? That one season?You must be nut hugging because I know not even your dumbass believes career numbers make one player better than the other.
David Greene held one record Colt holds not just the wins, but the accuracy percentage record for one season, and his career. Terrible try.I wonder how many Georgia nut huggers were running around calling David Greene the best QB ever before Colt broke his record of most wins.
this was what you said first.
I agree, selective reading is not a good thing. Neither is lying.
guess a misinformed idiot like you needs to hear that not winning a heisman isn't everything.Guess a misinformed idiot like you needs to hear that winning a heisman isn't everything
do you lie this much in person too?
says who? you? who are you?Maybe because we're discussing who the best QB is...and the entire ing career is what matters..not one season.
I'm not assuming anything, but you certainly are.Obviously you're assuming that the glass bodied Bradford would be able to stay healthy and play as good as he has his entire career.
in 2008, in Colt's best statistical year, one guy got the Heisman....and better stats.And your assumptions have GOT to be right, don't they? One guy went out, stayed healthy, and got the stats, and one guy didn't. That's what matters.
I'm not saying Bradford is better than McCoy. I'm saying you are a liar and your reasoning for choosing McCoy as the best QB ever is flawed because you keep contradicting yourself.OK..so then you tell me, since you can't use numbers to tell who's the better QB, how the do you do it? You tell me what makes Bradford better than McCoy? That one season?
So that I can go back and show you what a dumbass you are, answer which of Colt McCoy's seasons do you think was better.......the 2008 one loss Colt or the 2009 undefeated Colt where he might win a Heisman?
David Greene held one record Colt holds not just the wins, but the accuracy percentage record for one season, and his career. Terrible try.
Colt's career % is 70.9.
Harrell's was 69.2.
Harrell also hold the record for most career TDs and finished 2nd in career passing yards.
Absolutely horrible tries on your part to go with all of your lying.
You going nuts over a few percentage points of accuracy is an awesome display of nuthuggery though.
Last edited by Blake; 12-09-2009 at 01:46 AM.
Let's see..I said I think Colt McCoy is better than Bradford...I said Colt has the highest accuracy percentage in NCAA history, and the most wins. Where's the lie in that? I'd say your hatred was turning you into an idiot, if you weren't already one in the first place. Where's the contradiction? I said his stats were better...and they are. I said he has more wins...and he does. I said he has more guts...and he does. Please continue to lie about what I'm saying so I can continue to laugh at you.
70.9 > 69.2
But saying I'm going nuts is ing ignorant. I said, as you posted above, that in my opinion, Colt is the best of all time. Argue my opinion all you want, but that won't change it. And where the did Harrell come into this conversation? You were arguing that Bradford was better than Colt...Bradford's completion percentage is 64.6 over his career. I know for damn sure you're not trying to say Harrell is better than McCoy..you can't be that stupid.
Mike Vick did not make it to a Super Bowl and Colt is not better than Bradford in everything.
Please continue to lie so everyone else can continue to laugh at you.
This is about Colt, not Vick, and you need to decide if you're talking about Bradford or Harrell.
Please continue to mock people as your only defense because you know you have no actual intelligent response.
ugh.
you're an idiot. I'm beginning to think you don't know what a lie is.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
