So you coming in here, not trolling? My OP was a comment asshole. can two dumb s not come up with these arguments, you have to come in trolling? I can see how you three wouldn't understand trolling since that is your MO. Try commenting on the video or GTFO and make a post about how Glenn Beck videos are a waste of your time. You lemmings do this all the time. Dueches like yall are why we shouldn't have a post count. There would be less of you three.
wtf? Jesus Christ you're re ed. Either that or you're old and can't keep up with the modern lexicon. Calling everyone a troll just for s sake doesn't make it so.
Who the cares about their post count?
and lol at you calling anyone a lemming. Can you not see that you are exactly what you claim others to be?
lol @ SnC trolling his own thread.
Way to show those damn liberal hippies what rational, well thought-out, educated discourse sounds like!
You should change your user le to, "Spursncowboys: Rising above the fray."Fail.
Threads with no initial comments suck. Its just pure political propaganda instead of slightly diluted propaganda.
Thing is, no one is going to watch an 11 minute video without some insight. It isn't some conspiracy against the right-wing either. Pretty sure no one watched all those 2-hour long 9/11 conspiracy vids without a comment either (though at that length those better be convincing comments).
<p></p>
I gave a breakdown with the times of what was on the video. why come on here and comment if u r not going to watch the video? how is that not trolling??
<p> </p>
Last edited by spursncowboys; 12-09-2009 at 09:29 AM.
I like it.
way to join a discussion and add nothing to it. good job keeping your streak alive.
why do you get so butt hurt when someone calls you out?
On the contrary, I believe he enjoys it. SnC will ignore direct replies to go after so-called trolls. He routinely abandons his own threads to go round and round with hecklers, then he whines about getting hijacked, just like he did here.
What discussion will that be? The one you didn't start? Please show me where the discussion about this thread is after you ignored your own initial post.
what direct reply have i ignored?
How can I ignore my own initial post dumb ? The fact is I posted a video with a outline of what he was talking about. It was an opinion about what kind of personn obama keeps around him. Then the trolls showed up. I don't have to put a response towards my own op.
lighten up Francis
Beck's opinion only matters to people like you so stop acting surprised when people mock you when he is used a source.
Continue to show off how classy you are, snc. It really showcases why you should be listened to as a voice of reason.
And you still haven't commented on the video you posted.This is great.
he did comment....sort of..Continue to show off how classy you are, snc. It really showcases why you should be listened to as a voice of reason.
And you still haven't commented on the video you posted.
2:30- Explains a convicted felon at white house dinner.
3:30- Explains who Robert Creemer is and shows a clip of his wife (Dem from IL) and explains his liberal leadership positions and why he went to prison.
4:50- Talks about his book he wrote in prison.
5:40- Starts explaining Creemer's 10 point plan.
Two pages now and I am the only one who posted something about the OP.Continue to show off how classy you are, snc. It really showcases why you should be listened to as a voice of reason.
And you still haven't commented on the video you posted.
SnC - rule1. is to not comment on a op I started after one post pertaining toward that topic is created. The op should stand on it's own. An OP I created should be interpreted by someone else before I include mine. Blocked posters and trolls do not count.
rule2.
rule3. profits
You forgot rule2. Whine and swear at people and call them idiots to provoke rational discourse and thoughtful discussion of the topic.Two pages now and I am the only one who posted something about the OP.
SnC - rule1. is to not comment on a op I started after one post pertaining toward that topic is created. The op should stand on it's own. An OP I created should be interpreted by someone else before I include mine. Blocked posters and trolls do not count.
rule2.
rule3. profits
Shoot, is Cry Havoc pretending he's all about elevating the dialogue here?
THat's funny how Sabar mentions that he hates posts with no initial comments. WHat do you want?
After a video or article that goes into the subject matter do you want us to add, "Heh heh! Right on Bro! +1!!!!!"?
No surprise since you always make the thread about yourself.
It's the "me me me" divaesque schtick that gets kudos from the "nuanced" crowd around here.
WHat a weak premise.
It's as if you've never been in a classroom where the teacher has showed a do entary with out adding input, and then ask the students to discuss the material.
C'mon you're now just arguing Sabar's weak premise that one must comment on a video so that there can be legit discussion.
Me and you both know you don't believe that. It's idiotic.
Actually, I made it about the video and the fact no one has commented on it.
Including you, of course.
I noticed you completely ran away from the thread where you expressed your belief that federal courts are "reserved" only for American citizens. I was actually discussing the thread subject. Why don't you want to discuss that anymore?
You didn't comment once on the video, Barry.
In case you haven't noticed, I've long since stopped responding to your tired, humorless schtick.
Neither did you.You didn't comment once on the video, Barry.
Not once.
That was my comment on the video -- that you didn't comment on it, so why should anyone else?
You still haven't commented on the video.
Not once.
One full day later.
Actually.
Progress!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
