FRC: Comparing the Lifestyles of sexual Couples to Married Couples

[mogrovejo]

Why don't you your mother.

meltdown.

[BacktoBasics]

[BacktoBasics]

[BacktoBasics]

[spursncowboys]

still no argument about the article. Nothing specific.
Blake: what part of the article is just biased? What information isn't cited by a credible source? What facts were left out?

[spursncowboys]

still no argument about the article. Nothing specific.
Blake: what part of the article is just biased? What information isn't cited by a credible source? What facts were left out?

[BacktoBasics]

still no argument about the article. Nothing specific.
Blake: what part of the article is just biased? What information isn't cited by a credible source? What facts were left out?

They're pointless statistics because the variables aren't even remotely comparable. You can't compare the successful variations of the color blue by comparing black. There is no way possible to compare centuries of man/woman marriage to the relationships of gay people or what few legal unions they have.

Its not even reasonable.

...and you.

[BacktoBasics]

I'm gonna start again.

[BacktoBasics]

[BacktoBasics]

[Blake]

Flawed argument because nobody is preventing gays from

1) being together as a live in couple
2) entering a legal civil union or 'new name' ins ution with all the same rights



The problem here is MARRIAGE is Man + Woman.

Period. We do NOT WANT IT REDEFINED.

which is safer, lesbian sex or heterosexual sex?

[BacktoBasics]

[spursncowboys]

still no specific argument that has merit. an article with so many different subjects cannot be just rounded up with the "apples and oranges" excuse.
B2B: you didn't even read the article.

[BacktoBasics]

[BacktoBasics]

still no specific argument that has merit. an article with so many different subjects cannot be just rounded up with the "apples and oranges" excuse.
B2B: you didn't even read the article.

Its ing insulting. Biased. Rooted in bigotry. you.

[BacktoBasics]

[Blake]

still no argument about the article. Nothing specific.
Blake: what part of the article is just biased? What information isn't cited by a credible source? What facts were left out?

The netherlands sexual divorce rate is basically the same as the hetero rate at about 1% per year.

the web site is biased and the article ridiculously flips the stats around to make heterosexual marriage look that much better.

Married Couples
· A 2001 National Center for Health Statistics study on marriage and divorce statistics reported that 66 percent of first marriages last ten years or longer, with fifty percent lasting twenty years or longer.

hilarious.

[BacktoBasics]

[BacktoBasics]

[jack sommerset]

still no specific argument that has merit. an article with so many different subjects cannot be just rounded up with the "apples and oranges" excuse.
B2B: you didn't even read the article.

I am not trying to be mean but the dude sells trailors, married like 5 times, has step kids that hate him, makes no money, whines all the ing time, gets along with no one,,,,,the guy is a LOSER. Let him rant. I am surprised he has not killed himself yet. This is good for him.

[BacktoBasics]

[TDMVPDPOY]

i think both types get the same serving of meat right? hahhahahahahaa

[BacktoBasics]

I am not trying to be mean but the dude sells trailors, married like 5 times, has step kids that hate him, makes no money, whines all the ing time, gets along with no one,,,,,the guy is a LOSER. Let him rant. I am surprised he has not killed himself yet. This is good for him.

You can't even spell "trailer".

[jack sommerset]

You can't even spell "trailer".

No need to until now, loser.

[BacktoBasics]

No need to until now, loser.

You're right being able to spell simple words would certainly not discredit your ability to call someone a loser.