Reply With Quote
You really wont get it because women love romance. Vampires, as described by the authors and Hollywood movies are romantics.
Chad on the other hand, doesn't have a lick of romance in his bones.
I don't get it.
A guy invites you to his house, throws a roofie in your cosmopolitan and proceeds to have his way. You then wake up sober and you find your closest attorney.
A vampire will do the same. He will give you a hickey, draw blood until you pass out, and bangs you with an upside down cross, after your concious you fall in love with him and think he's something special.
In my oppinion both Chad and Dracula deserve to be punished, but to you ladies Chad is the asshole and Dracula is "charming".
I mean, why would you want a lifeless half zombie vampire with a cold corpse for a body and a limp cuz of poor circulation?
This doesn't make any natural sense. I think women just love vampires because they're loaded with inherited old wealth. Which proves my point that most women are gold diggers who don't need men because they use vibrators. They just need their wallets.
Point being.
Vampires are gay. They're not cool, they wear too much gel and sport a tacky medalion with a hobby lobby ruby replica.
And don't get started with Pirates or Ninjas. Ninjas suck, they disapear and they're japanese and Kimbo Slice would kick their ass. Pirates are not cool, ladies these guys have sea smeg, a diseased liver, and every STD imaginable through gay butt sex on the boats.
thanx, Anytime.
Just raising the dialogue here,
gtownspur
You really wont get it because women love romance. Vampires, as described by the authors and Hollywood movies are romantics.
Chad on the other hand, doesn't have a lick of romance in his bones.
Because of Romance
Gentlemen you need to know that women were born for love and love was born for romance
Early vampires were horrific and ugly... it wasn't untill modern fiction that you got the pussified version that we see today.
why do you disrespect me and embarrass yourself by continuing to post?
Exactly. It's as if one day whoever started this backwards trend just said to himself "hey, vampires are a sex symbol". To anyone living before this decade that would be absurd and goofy
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=139906
Similar discussion
If a guy doesn't masturbate or have sex in a period of time like 1 month or so, unconsciously he may probably gets his pants tainted at some night sleeping, during which he harvests orgasm. That's nothing beyond nature IMHO. My thoughts may probably be offensive to some hardest Christian believers but according to Darwin's theory, Humans were orientated from animals. Presumable at some point of time in the very ancient history, humans weren't smart enough to masturbate and the ancient human probes were severely unbalanced in gender. Like the king/leader of the probe holds dozens of females as his lovers and most times his factory wasn't so productive to satisfy all his "wives", then some of these concubines suffered severe lack of male's strokes. But the nature gives them this satisfaction once in a while, to make it livable for them.
Humans are naturally given a sexual orgasm once in roughly a month time if they haven't done anything like masturbation or sex during this month. A man just doesn't experience it no more since he's learned masturbation or has got someone to have real sex with. Theoretically females should also lose the monthly vampire if she gets sexed someday in this month, I mean she should have got impregnated through the sex she had. Human's evolution was actually a devolution at some point IMHO, like male's abilities to gets females pregnant. I mean a dog, or a tiger, or any other kind of mammal doesn't need so many times of sexes to get a female pregnant as humans do.
In a word... YOU SUCK, brothers.
It would certainly appear that it's more recent interpretations of Hollywood vampires, especially these new vampires who refrain from actually attacking and drinking blood but are more concerned about romance. There isn't a fear or a disgust with these vampires because they don't want to turn you into a vampire. They just want to love you. The danger is still there but the risk is marginalized so much. Oooooh, dreamy vampire who looks 18 years old wants to love and protect me and doesn't want to hurt me. What the is that?
is OP so confusing a person or I was just the only one puzzled here? OP didn't talk about anything associated to hollywood or alike IMHO.
I saw a real vampire once.
They are not that good looking; and they are mean
Kimbo Slice would beat a ninja? Yeah right, Kimbo Slice sucks ass.
30 Days of Night are vampires.
About women... Best piece of advice...
The opposite of love isn't hate. It's indifference.
Actually the romanticization of vampires started in the 70's with Anne Rice's Vampire Chronicles. I can only speak for myself, but a handsome,dark, intense man with a tortured soul is the ultimate project----to have the ability to save a man from himself with only our femininity would be pretty amazing. And.....nibbling/biting during sex is HOT!!
cuz women like jerks, and vampires are the ultimate jerks
Oh you are absolutely right! I forgot Dracula was published during the sexually conservative Victorian era. Must have caused many cases of the vapors
Vampires are sexy to women simply because.......
Let me go ask my wife.
It was actually in the early 1800s, even before Dracula, that vampires were romanticized. But considering the lenght of time that storys of vampires go back I considered it modern fiction.
Sexy, lustful, romantic, vampire was created by Barnabas, in Dark Shadows in the mid sixties!!!
The only romantic thing I like to see in vampires is when their hearts meet and bleed on Blade's silver tipped stakes.
Never go to a Dr. named Acula.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
