Reply With Quote
I think the epitome of self-ownage is choosing a nick that references a team you hate. That guy owns himself every time he hits submit.
is loL@Mavs fan that benjarvus got?
I think the epitome of self-ownage is choosing a nick that references a team you hate. That guy owns himself every time he hits submit.
I don't see why people keep saying this. Duncan has almost always had a better PER on a year to year basis (there are certainly a few years where Dirk was better) and Duncan has a better career PER than Dirk.
Well, I think you can make that case that Duncan is better, but using that specific list, you'd also want Chris Bosh and Kevin Martin over Kobe and Wade. Does that make sense?
This guy is def. not someone's troll. If it is, that person is doing a tremendous job staying in character. The best part is this guy is a die hard Cowboys fan in the NFL forum.
No, I was not saying that the PER argument is a trump card. I was just saying that I don't get why a few people keep saying "Spurs fans hate the PER argument until this year when it supports them..."
For the reasons I outlined that makes no sense. Even if it does not mean anything, it makes no sense for Spurs fans to hate the argument when it favors Duncan over time.
Martin's only played 5 games(sample size is too small). He's sure to drop off the top 10 when he returns from injury.
I posted that list to prove to mavsfan1000 that Duncan is not playing "like a shadow of his old self". He's as efficient as he's ever been. That statement may apply to Parker or Ginobili(who have both played like this season) but it seems strange to throw it at Duncan.
NBA.com's efficiency stat is little different:
http://www.nba.com/statistics/player...DD=All%20Teams
Again, both lists have their problems(Kevin Martin for instance) but the fact that Duncan's ranked highly on both says a lot about how good he's been this season(so far anyway). I'm just pointing out that the gap isn't as huge as Mav fans make it out to be.
Ask yourself what knowledgable basketball fan takes Dirk over Duncan?
1) A Mavs fan
I said knowledgeable
ing Germans. Nothing changes.
]Martin's only played 5 games(sample size is too small). He's sure to drop off the top 10 when he returns from injury.
[/B]
I posted that list to prove to mavsfan1000 that Duncan is not playing "like a shadow of his old self". He's as efficient as he's ever been. That statement may apply to Parker or Ginobili(who have both played like this season) but it seems strange to throw it at Duncan.
NBA.com's efficiency stat is little different:
http://www.nba.com/statistics/player...DD=All%20Teams
Again, both lists have their problems(Kevin Martin for instance) but the fact that Duncan's ranked highly on both says a lot about how good he's been this season(so far anyway). I'm just pointing out that the gap isn't as huge as Mav fans make it out to be.
link? proof? How the do you know that? Can you tell me who's winning the superbowl? I'm tired of waiting.
For the record, I'd like to say that I think it's bunk that Spurs fans are using the PER in this argument.
All of you guys are stupid arguing for both Duncan and Dirk because Zach Randolph is the best PF in the NBA.
32 points and 24 rebounds against the Nuggets and 33 points and 18 rebounds against the Warriors. Dirk can't do that against these two teams. Zach can. The Grizzlies will be the best team in the league before long and it will be because of me and Zach.
Mav Fans < Laker Fans.
Laker fans KNOW that the answer is Duncan.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
