Originally Posted by FromWayDowntown View Post
Doesn't it say something that the Spurs had Ely here -- and that he was a part of a le team after they traded for him -- but they have no interest in him?
I understand that there is some need to prove oneself to be a basketball genius by promoting an "unearthed gem" who will somehow become a contributor after having been forgotten on the scrap heap. But in pimping Ely -- and particularly in suggesting that he'd fit with the Spurs -- you're talking to a fanbase that has been there and done that and didn't much care for what it saw. More importantly, there comes a point in time where the whole world realizes that a guy just isn't a player at the NBA level, and certainly not a giy who can contribute to a team with le aspirations. I'd submit to you that no matter his skillset, that's Melvin Ely, circa 2010. It was Eddie Robinson a few years before that. Maybe Tyrone Nesby or Lamond Murray in the years that preceded those two. The truth is, however, that time shows those players to be tragically limited and easily replaceable -- and that truth becomes readily apparent to anyone who watches players without a "See how brilliant I am" agenda.
The temptation to promote a player as a pet project in the hope that he pans out so that you can say "See I told you so" (with the only downside being some remote chance that others will recall your insistence upon that player's worth when it has been disproven) is a cliche on internet message boards. Such unbridled support for Melvin Ely is just another variation on that theme. So thanks for ensuring that the cliche remains alive and well on SpursTalk.