Reply With Quote
Pray tell...?
lol; kettle.
Pray tell...?
The problem with the MWC is that the bottom feeders of that conference are bringing the rest down.
Its like walking into central LA. You look to the right and you see all the A list celebrities and their houses, and you look to the left and you see the JGWs. Not a lot of middle ground.
Teams like New Mexico, NM st, and San Diego State, would lose against any other BCS conference.
But there is no doubt that right now TCU, Utah, and BYU are more desirable places to play and handing out way more football scholarships then the Oregon States, Cal, Stanford, and UAs of the world and thats a fact Jack
First of all, I'm a celebrity. Second, I disagree about Stanford and Arizona...cal and Oregon state?...sure.
Ummm...New Mexico State is is the WAC.
Before this season New Mexico had been in 5 bowl games in 8 years. Their basketball program has always been a top 30 team in the nation. UNLV has never been a football program, but again always has one of the top 25-30 basketball teams. Colorado State was a decent football team in the early 2000's but lately has been nothing but , even though they did beat a BCS team this year. San Diego State is just a joke of a sports university. Occasionally they produce a semi decent basketball team but without question SDSU is the MWC version of Washington State. The rest of the teams in the MWC (TCU, BYU, Utah, Air Force, Wyoming) are currently better football teams and programs than a lot of BCS teams.
So realistically the MWC has 2 really bad football teams, 1 semi bad football team, and one that has been decent over the past 8 years. Every BCS conference has bottom feeders as well. Pac-10 with Washington State and until this year Washington, Big 10 has Indiana, Purdue, and Northwestern. Big 12 has Baylor, and Iowa State. ACC has Duke, which historically can probably be considered the worst college football program in the nation, and the Big East's entire conference minus a couple teams. The MWC is on par with most BCS conferences when talking about bottom feeders. I don't feel like this is an arguement that people can use anymore in regards to the MWC not being a BCS conference.
dont say that about baylor! theyre my 12th favorite team
BTW I should add that the only reason why the MWC shouldn't be considered a BCS conference right now is the amount of teams in the MWC. They need to make it a 10 team league, or a 12 team league and create two divisions. Until this happens I don't think they'll become a BCS conference.
Who would the MWC pull in to become a 12-team conference? Perhaps grab a few teams from the WAC like Boise St.? That could possibly work and it would then pretty much cripple the WAC...But in no way should any conference replace the Pac-10...it was a pretty damn exciting season (except for a few games...no need to be mentioned...)
the WAC is nothing without BSU anyways, they've been riding that gravy train long enough.
but If there's a going to be a 7th AQ conference, it can't be just the MWC + 3, there are good C-USA West teams that should be in the new AQ instead of teams like New Mexico and Wyoming
how about...
MWC North:
BYU
Utah
BSU
Colorado St.
Air Force
Nevada or UNLV
MWC South:
TCU
Houston
Fresno St.
UNLV or Tulsa
SDSU or Tulsa
SMU or Tulsa
or whatever, I think it should be the best teams from the WAC, MWC, and C-USA West. you can't tell me that from top to bottom, this Conference wouldn't be just as good as your average current AQ conference (except the SEC), and recruiting should only get better for these teams once they have AQ status,
So if MWC is nothing without BSU and the P10 is obviously nothing without SC, then maybe those two should play and the winner gets to go to the Rose Bowl every year.
UCLA better find a way to pull this out against Temple.
Temple is decent. I didn't expect ucla to roll them, just to win.
...down by 1.
ok, they're still D-1AA
That doesn't make any sense. They are 1-A.
They didn't used to be, i don't think.
yeah, you're right thats my bad.
i guess i got non-bcs and d1-aa confused....my fault.
so if the MWC should replace the Pac 10 in the BCS because this year does that mean the Pac 10 was the best conference ever last year 5-0?
Anyone watching sun bowl? Stanford playing well without Luck. Don't want to jinx it, but if the Cardinal can win, that would be big for Pac.
If OU scores here this is over.
I missed most of the game. How did Bradford have a completion?
I saw that too when I looked up Broyles stats....he hasn't played.
Even the Pac 10 haters should admit, that's an impressive performance with luck out. Gerhart played well, in perhaps his last game.
OU was without their Heisman trophy winner...
Yah, but he's been out all year. This was the first game that Pritchard started this year.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions