Reply With Quote
No.
Nevada high court: O.J. jury questions should have been public!
By The Associated Press
LAS VEGAS — Jury questionnaires in last year's O.J. Simpson robbery-kidnapping trial are subject to public disclosure and should not have been kept from the news media by the judge, the Nevada Supreme Court has ruled.
In a 6-0 ruling Dec. 24 in Stephens Media v. Dist. Ct., the court sided with open-records arguments by the Associated Press and Stephens Media LLC, owner of the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
Attorney Donald Campbell, who represented AP and the Review-Journal in the case, hailed the decision as "a victory for the First Amendment and a victory for every citizen."
"One of the most critical features of our legal system is public access and open trials," Campbell said. "This decision reinforces just how important that commitment to full access is."
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=22442
This is the first set in overturning an outrage of justice; the persecution of O.J. Simpson by a Police State.
____
Complete O.J. Simpson juror questionnaires released after Supreme Court order
"The 27-page questionnaire with 116 questions was filled out by about 500 potential jurors before the trial.
But only about 50 of the questionnaires are in the District Court evidence room, where the do ents are kept.
It was not immediately known what happened to the remaining questionnaires."
http://www.lvrj.com/news/complete-oj...-80254892.html
Hmmm??? Could it be that biased jurors were allowed to judge Simspon?
Last edited by Galileo; 01-01-2010 at 02:13 AM.
No.
Hard to say, but so many people were convinced he was guilty of murder, that I would say it is possible.
no, it's not. this suit is about the ability of the press to view certain public do ents and has nothing whatsover to do with the validity or strength of the criminal charges levied against O.J.
probably not, because the judge sitting on the criminal trial would have excluded any juror that expressed a bias against O.J. or any potential criminal defendant similarly situated for that matter.
Mass Deception! You have all been duped!
The OJ Simpson murder trial was the crown jewel of the police state; makes the public think that people acquitted by juries are still guilty, even when they are proven innocent!
You can't win!!!
You are presumed innocent unless proven guilty!
PROOF that OJ Simpson is INNOCENT of murder!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...59946122795&hl
Last edited by Galileo; 01-02-2010 at 02:06 AM.
Simpson was proven guilty of kidnapping and robbery.
The Supreme court is going to throw those charges out soon.
When you remove all the media fluff from the case....the physical evidence points to a strong likelyhood that Simpson did not commit the murders himself...
Now, there's still the possibility he paid someone to do it but that's not how he was tried..
as far as the kidnapping charges, he shouldn't have gone to the hotel room with weapons, but he was just retriving stuff which was his...
...the case should never have been tried in Vegas county..
O.J. won that trial--he was free to search for the "real killers" on every exclusive golf resort from L.A. to Honolulu.
yep
according to a jury of 12
no they're not
k
Seriously, why should he after the Brown's took all his money? Besides, he knows who the attacker was, his shoe prints were in the blood at the murder scene...
Yeah, but that's kidnapping.
There is no Vegas county....the case should never have been tried in Vegas county..
OJ's son Jason ... is HE the guilty one?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUg_wzuWAJw
The kidnapping charge will be thrown out on appeal. Basically, if you get into an argument with your wife/girlfriend/husband/kid etc. and someone claims that the other blocked the door for 30 seconds, then you have a kidnapping charge.
Sorry, the courts have a limit.
As I understand it, if you hold someone against his will with a gun in Nevada, that's kidnapping.
I have seen no potential appeal based on the applicability of the kidnapping charge. If you have one, you should post it.
It might be now if your name is OJ. But soon the Supreme Court will throw it out. OJ, at minimum, will be getting a much shorter sentence.
A 60 year old first time offender does not deserve 33 years for a simple argument in a hotel room.
Again, if you have seen a potential appeal based on the actual kidnapping charge, post it.
He deserves it for armed kidnapping and robbery. I believe the judge actually received a harsher sentence recommendation from the parole board than Simpson ended up getting.A 60 year old first time offender does not deserve 33 years for a simple argument in a hotel room.
you have zero understanding of the law. do us a favor and stop posting about things of which you know nothing.
OJ was found guilty because he murdered his wife and that waiter. This trial was payback. One of the dudes he "kidnapped" said OJ didn't kidnap him. The two "victims" said OJ took his own back. Some people in the hotel room said there was a gun and others said there was no gun. All of them said OJ did not have a gun.The prosecution durning closing arguements were allowed to discuss the murder trial back in the 90's. The detectives were caught talking about getting OJ back. Of course some others involved in the case got sweetheart deals to go against OJ.
I have zero trouble with OJ being in jail. He is a killer and should have been executed! If this was not OJ, charges would not have been filed. Way too many holes let alone someone being found guilty and gets 10-12 years for this weird ass story/crime. OJ is in jail for taking his own back but really killing his wife and that waiter.
Last edited by jack sommerset; 01-02-2010 at 07:00 PM.
I'm an expert. My nme is Galileo. The kidnapping charge is going to be thrown out. OJ's co-defendant is going to get a separate trial as well.
This is the bare minimum. The entire trial was a joke, and it needs a do-over.
How long have you practiced criminal law in Nevada?
Not very long, but my friends do.
"Not very long" -- meaning never, right?
Which friend? The one who didn't have a gun in his pants but was just happy to see the police?
Galileo. If you think OJ did not kill Nicole and Ron then OJs recent trial should disturb the out of you. I doubt it does. Other than that, let that dirty ing piece of rot in jail until he dies. He had more than a weekend pass for that murder he committed. He is one lucky mofo being alive.
lol, open records
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
